Urology Annals
About UA | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Online submissionLogin 
Urology Annals
  Editorial Board | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact
Users Online: 24   Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size


 
Table of Contents
CASE REPORT
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 110-113  

Primary renal synovial sarcoma


Department of Pathology, S.D.M. College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Dharwad, India

Date of Submission31-May-2010
Date of Acceptance01-Oct-2010
Date of Web Publication17-Jun-2011

Correspondence Address:
Vandana U Grampurohit
Department of Pathology, S.D.M. College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Dharwad - 580 009
India
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/0974-7796.82182

PMID: 21747606

Get Permissions

   Abstract 

Primary synovial sarcoma (SS) of kidney is very rare and difficult to diagnose. Here, we present a case of a 21-year-old female clinically diagnosed as renal cell carcinoma. Right nephrectomy specimen showed a cystic tumor in the upper pole of kidney with areas of hemorrhage and solid growth. Histologically, it showed poorly differentiated cells with hemangiopericytoma-like vascular pattern. Morphologic and immunohistochemical features were compatible with the diagnosis of poorly differentiated SS of kidney. Primary renal SS is a recently described entity. To the best of our knowledge, approximately 34 cases have been reported till date and this is the eighth documented case of poorly differentiated variant. Most of the time, poorly differentiated SS of kidney exhibits hemangiopericytoma like histology. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction analysis to demonstrate SYT-SSX fusion gene transcript helps to confirm the diagnosis.

Keywords: Kidney, poorly differentiated, synovial sarcoma


How to cite this article:
Grampurohit VU, Myageri A, Rao RV. Primary renal synovial sarcoma. Urol Ann 2011;3:110-3

How to cite this URL:
Grampurohit VU, Myageri A, Rao RV. Primary renal synovial sarcoma. Urol Ann [serial online] 2011 [cited 2014 Jul 24];3:110-3. Available from: http://www.urologyannals.com/text.asp?2011/3/2/110/82182


   Introduction Top


Synovial sarcoma (SS) is a clinically and genetically defined morphologic entity of uncertain histogenesis. It accounts for 5-10% of adult soft tissue sarcomas. SSs occur predominantly (80%) in para-articular regions of extremities but can involve almost any other site. [1],[2] Primary renal SS is a rare tumor, first described by Faria et al. in 1999. [2] This tumor poses diagnostic dilemma because it is quite difficult to differentiate it from metastatic sarcoma, sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma, and hemangiopericytoma which may have similar histological features. The tumor grows slowly and insidiously, mimicking benign lesions, thus often delaying right diagnosis and treatment. [3]


   Case Report Top


A 21-year-old female presented with a history of fever, hematuria and right flank pain since 1 month. Abdominal computerized tomography (CT) revealed a heterogenous, well-marginated soft tissue mass arising in the upper pole of right kidney with solid, necrotic components and heterogenous enhancement. There was no evidence of renal vein, inferior vena cava or right atrial thrombosis. No local invasion or lymphadenopathy was identified [Figure 1]a and b. Radiological and clinical diagnosis was consistent with renal cell carcinoma.
Figure 1: (a and b) Abdominal CT showing well marginated soft tissue mass arising in the upper pole of right kidney

Click here to view


Right nephrectomy specimen weighed 220 g and measured 12Χ6Χ3.5 cm. Cut section showed a cystic tumor with soft, solid growth having yellow-brown tan color in the upper pole, measuring 4.5Χ4.4Χ4 cm. Areas of hemorrhage and necrosis were seen [Figure 2].
Figure 2: Grossly, yellow-brown tan mass in the upper pole in welldefined cystic space

Click here to view


Histopathology revealed neoplasm composed of solid monomorphic sheets of round, plump cells showing high nucleocytoplasmic ratio, clear to eosinophilic cytoplasm with central vesicular nuclei and prominent nucleoli. Stroma showed rich vascularity with vessels showing hemangiopericytoma-like pattern. Five mitoses per ten high-power fields were noted. Areas of necrosis and hemorrhage were also observed [Figure 3] and [Figure 4]. Adjacent renal parenchyma showed multiple cortical scars and hyalinization. Extension of tumor into renal calyces was seen. Ureter and renal vessel showed no evidence of thrombosis. Overall, the features strongly suggested malignant hemangiopericytoma.
Figure 3: The tumor shows solid sheets of plump spindle cells with high N:C ratio, pleomorphism and frequent mitoses. The inset shows the clear cell change in tumor cells (H and E, ×40)

Click here to view
Figure 4: Tumor showing hemangiopericytoma-like vascular pattern (H and E, ×40)

Click here to view


Immunohistochemical study showed strong positivity for Bcl-2, vimentin, CD99/MIC-2, calponin, CD56, focal positivity for epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), cytokeratin (CK) and negativity for muscle specific desmin, actin, CD117, CD34 and CD31 [Figure 5]. Morphologic and immunohistochemical features were compatible with the diagnosis of poorly differentiated SS of kidney.
Figure 5: Immunohistochemical study of tumor cells showing (a) diffuse positivity for BCl-2; (b) focal positivity for EMA; (c) strong positivity for CD99; and (d) negativity for CD34

Click here to view


Postoperatively, the patient is free of local recurrence or metastasis 6 months after surgery.


   Discussion Top


SS is a clinically and morphologically well-defined, but uncommon, entity which is known to occur at unusual sites. [2] Histologically, it is subclassified into biphasic (BSS), monophasic spindle cell (MSSS) and poorly differentiated variants. Amongst these, poorly differentiated synovial sarcoma (PDSS) comprises approximately 20% of cases and shows poorest prognosis. PDSS shows three histologic variants - large cell, small cell and high grade spindle cell variant - and is composed of sheets of undifferentiated round cells with hyperchromatic nuclei and frequent mitoses. Such tumors often have a richly vascular pattern with dilated, thin-walled vascular spaces resembling hemangiopericytoma. [1],[2],[3]

Primary renal sarcomas are rare neoplasms that account for 1% of malignant renal tumors. Leiomyosarcoma is the most frequent type comprising 40-60%, followed by rhabdomyosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, osteosarcoma, liposarcoma, angiosarcoma and hemangiopericytoma. In the kidney, 25 cases of MSSS, 2 cases of BSS and 7 cases of PDSS have been reported. To the best of our knowledge, approximately only 34 cases have been reported till date and this is the eighth documented case of poorly differentiated variant. [1],[4] It affects young individuals between 20 and 50 years. There is no clinical or imaging characteristic that can indicate the diagnosis. The diagnosis is difficult due to rarity of tumor and its similar presentations as compared to other renal tumors. [4],[5] Most of these neoplasms were interpreted radiologically as renal cell carcinoma. Grossly, they varied from case to case but were generally well-defined, irregular large masses ranging from 5 to 20 cm. Extension into inferior vena cava was reported in three cases. Grossly identifiable smooth-walled cysts were identified in eight cases. [1],[6],[7] The present case also showed a cystic component. A subset of PDSS exhibits a hemangiopericytoma-like morphology and many have been misinterpreted as hemangiopericytoma at diagnosis. [3]

PDSS, primitive neuroectodermal tumor and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor may show immunophenotypic overlap. So, these three entities may be differentiated using a panel of antibodies. Immunohistochemical studies of primary renal SS cases have consistently shown positivity for Bcl2, CD99/Mic2, CD56, Vimentin and focal positivity for EMA. They do not stain for desmin, actin, CD34, CD31. [1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10] Although EMA is not a specific marker of SS, its presence in poorly differentiated sarcoma can suggest SS. The simultaneous use of antibodies to both CD99 and CD56 may be useful in the differential diagnosis of PDSS because SS will almost always be positive with both, whereas PNETs will be CD99 positive and CD56 negative and MPNSTs will be CD99 negative but CD56 positive. [10]

Reverse trancriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis of SS shows a unique chromosomal translocation t(X;18)(p11.2;q11.2) that results in the fusion of SYT gene on chromosome 18 with SSX family gene on chromosome X and helps to confirm the diagnosis. [1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12]

Differential diagnosis includes Wilms' tumor, mixed epithelial-stromal tumor, sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma, congenital mesoblastic nephroma, PNET, MPNST and hemangiopericytoma. To arrive at a diagnosis of renal SS, the possibilities of distant metastasis and secondary extension of retroperitoneal SS must be ruled out. Hemangiopericytoma differs from renal SS by its CD34 positivity and CK negativity. [1],[2],[3],[12]

Although primary surgical resection is the treatment of choice for SS, the prognosis is poor with this treatment alone. SS may be sensitive to high dose isophosphamide and adriamycin based regimen. [4],[5] As the number of cases of SS of the kidney is less due to its extreme rarity, no clear medical guidelines have yet been established. [11]

PDSS constitutes, by definition, a problem at diagnosis because of its unclear and variable histomorphological appearance. However, correct diagnosis is crucial as these tumors are associated with more aggressive behavior and metastasis and thus, with less favorable prognosis. [3]

Hence, SS should be included in differential diagnosis while dealing with renal sarcomas.

 
   References Top

1.Mauricio A, Paláu L, Pham TT, Barnard N, Merino MJ. Primary synovial sarcoma of the kidney with rhabdoid features. Int J Surg Pathol 2007;15:421-8.   Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Divetia M, Karpate A, Basak R, Desai SB. Synovial sarcoma of the kidney. Ann Diagn Pathol 2008;12:333-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
3.Tornkvist M, Wejde J, Ahlen J, Brodin B, Larsson O. A novel case of synovial sarcoma of the kidney: Impact of SS18/SSX analysis of renal hemangiopericytoma-like tumours. Diagn Mol Pathol 2004;11:47-51.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Dassi V, Das K, Singh BP, Swain SK. Primary synovial sarcoma of kidney: A rare tumour with an atypical presentation. Indian J Urol 2009;25:269-71.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
5.Schaal CH, Navarro FC, Francisco A, Neto M. Primary renal sarcoma with morphologic and immunohistochemical aspects compatible with synovial sarcoma. Int Braz J Urol 2004;30:210-3.   Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Park M, Baek T, Kim J, Kang D, Lee H, Son H. Primary synovial sarcoma of the kidney: A case report and literature review. Korean J Pathol 2009;43:274-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Argani P, Faria PA, Epstein JI, Reuter VE, Perlman EJ, Beckwith JB, et al. Primary renal synovial sarcoma. Molecular and morphologic delineation of an entity previously included among embryonal sarcomas of the kidney. Am J Surg Pathol 2000;24:1087-96.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
8.Kim DH, Sohn JH, Lee MC, Lee G, Yoon GS, Hashimoto H, et al. Primary Synovial sarcoma of the kidney. Am J Surg Pathol 2000;24:1097-104.   Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
9.Shannon BA, Murch A, Cohen RJ. Primary renal synovial sarcoma confirmed by cytogenetic analysis. A lesion distinct from sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2005;129:238-40.   Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
10.Folpe AL, Schmidt RA, Chapman D, Gown AM. Poorly differentiated synovial sarcoma: Immunohistochemical distinction from primitive neuroectodermal tumors and high-grade malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 1998;22:673-82.   Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
11.Kawahara T, Sekiguchi Z, Makiyama K, Nakayama T, Nagashima Y, Kita K, et al. Primary synovial sarcoma of the kidney. Case Rep Oncol 2009;2:189-93.   Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
12.Gabilondo F, Rodriguez F, Mohar A, Nuovo GJ, Domínguez-Malagón H. Primary synovial sarcoma of the kidney: Corroboration with in situ polymerase chain reaction Ann Diagn Pathol 2008;12:134-7.  Back to cited text no. 12
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]


This article has been cited by
1 Primary renal synovial sarcoma: A rare pathological entity?
Kacheriwala, S. and Bhatt, N. and Duttaroy, D.D. and Kothari, U.B.
Surgical Chronicles. 2013; 18(1): 37-39
[Pubmed]
2 Clinical and pathological features of primary renal synovial sarcoma: Analysis of 64 cases from 11 years of medical literature
Iacovelli, R. and Altavilla, A. and Ciardi, A. and Urbano, F. and Manai, C. and Gentile, V. and Cortesi, E.
BJU International. 2012; 110(10): 1449-1454
[Pubmed]
3 Clinical and pathological features of primary renal synovial sarcoma: analysis of 64 cases from 11 years of medical literature
Roberto Iacovelli,Amelia Altavilla,Antonio Ciardi,Federica Urbano,Chiara Manai,Valeria Gentile,Enrico Cortesi
BJU International. 2012; 110(10): 1449
[Pubmed]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
    Introduction
    Case Report
    Discussion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1542    
    Printed101    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded268    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 3    

Recommend this journal