Urology Annals
About UA | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Online submissionLogin 
Urology Annals
  Editorial Board | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact
Users Online: 1385   Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size


 
Table of Contents
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 195-196  

Comment on: Laparoscopic transperitoneal ureterolithotomy for large ureteric stone


Urology Unit, Department of Surgery, Kulliyyah of Medicine, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia

Date of Web Publication18-Oct-2012

Correspondence Address:
Mohd. Nazli Kamarulzaman
Consultant Urologist, Department of Surgery, Kulliyyah of Medicine, International Islamic University Malaysia, Jalan Penjara, 25100 Kuantan, Pahang Darul Makmur
Malaysia
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/0974-7796.102679

PMID: 23248532

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Kamarulzaman M. Comment on: Laparoscopic transperitoneal ureterolithotomy for large ureteric stone. Urol Ann 2012;4:195-6

How to cite this URL:
Kamarulzaman M. Comment on: Laparoscopic transperitoneal ureterolithotomy for large ureteric stone. Urol Ann [serial online] 2012 [cited 2019 Nov 14];4:195-6. Available from: http://www.urologyannals.com/text.asp?2012/4/3/195/102679

Sir,

I read with great interest the article titled "Laparoscopy transperitoneal ureterolithotomy for large ureteric stone" by Al-Sayyad. [1] The report is very informative, with some insight into the current trend of large proximal ureteric stone management. I have some comments on this work. Due to the nature of retrospective study, the value of this report is limited. The author did not define the meaning of large proximal ureteric stone clearly. In most of previous studies this classification was precise in term of size and site of ureteric stone. As an example Geol et al. [2] classify it as stone located between the ureteropelvic junction and the lower border of the 4 th lumbar vertebra, whereas Cengiz et al. [3] use 5 cm distal to the ureteropelvic junction. Goel et al. [2] found that the best option for those types of stone is percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) which give stone free rate of 98.5%. This success rates were almost similar to laparoscopic ureterolithotomy done by the author. [1] In contrast the laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in this study showed higher morbidity in comparison to the PCNL in Goel et al. [2] These shown by longer operative time (mean of 90 vs. 47 minutes) and longer hospital stay (mean of 62.4 vs. 46 hours). [1],[2] If we treat the patient individually with precise diagnosis of site and size of stone, the choice of treatment mode will be more accurate. Endourology procedures are documented as minimal invasive procedure with very low morbidity, but highly operator dependent. I would say that the best option for stone located close to ureteropelvic junction (5 cm) is PCNL. This endourology procedure will give high success rate with reasonable morbidity in an expert hand. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy only reserve for those cases which was contraindicated for PCNL.

 
   References Top

1.Al-Sayyad A. Laparoscopic transperitoneal ureterolithotomy for large ureteric stone. Urol Ann 2012;4:34-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
2.Goel R, Aron M, Kesarwani PK, Dogra PN, Hemal AK, Gupta NP. Percutaneous antegrade removal of impacted upper-ureteral calculi: Still the treatment of choice in developing countries. J Endourol. 2005;19:54-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Elgganainy E, Hameed DA, Elgammal MA, Abd-Elsayed AA Shalaby M. Experience with impacted upper ureteral Stones; should we abandon using semirigid ureteroscopes and pneumatic lithoclast? Int Arach Med 2009;2:13.  Back to cited text no. 3
    



This article has been cited by
1 laparoscopic surgery in patients with liver cirrhosis with gallbladder stones: effect on immunity and complications
qiu, y.-r. and zhang, h.-y.
world chinese journal of digestology. 2014; 22(6): 862-867
[Pubmed]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1518    
    Printed76    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded230    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal