Urology Annals
About UA | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Online submissionLogin 
Urology Annals
  Editorial Board | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact
Users Online: 187   Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size


 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 198-201  

Safety of latex urinary catheters for the short time drainage


Trauma Research Center, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran

Date of Submission08-Mar-2013
Date of Acceptance31-Jul-2013
Date of Web Publication12-Jun-2014

Correspondence Address:
Mehrdad Hosseinpour
Trauma Research Center, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan
Iran
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/0974-7796.134257

PMID: 25125890

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Background: In this study, we attempt to identify the most appropriate catheter (silicone vs. latex) for short-term urinary catheterization. We compared the post-operative clinico-pathological complications between latex and silicone for short term catheterization in rabbits with hypospadias.
Materials and Methods: Forty rabbits were used in our study to compare complications of catheterization. They were divided in two groups. Hypospadias like defect was created by a 1 cm long excision of the ventral urethra. For urethroplasty, we used tubularized incised plate technique. Latex and silicon catheters were used in groups 1 and 2, respectively.Post-operatively, routine laboratory urine test and complications (allergy, infection, bleeding) were compared in groups.
Results: A total of 40 rabbits underwent hypospadias repair. Findings showed that there were no significant differences between groups based on urine test indices (P = NS). Urinary tract infection rate was 10% (2 rabbits) in latex and 0% in silicone groups (P = NS). There were no significant differences between groups regarding of cystitis grades between study groups (P = NS).
Conclusion: It seems that urinary tract catheterization with latex catheters is a safe, feasible, and in-expensive procedure for short-term post-operative course in hypospadias surgery in patients without latex hypersensitivity.

Keywords: Complication, foley catheter, hypospadias, silicone catheter


How to cite this article:
Hosseinpour M, Noori S, Amir-Beigi M, Pourfakharan MH, Ehteram H, Hamsayeh M. Safety of latex urinary catheters for the short time drainage. Urol Ann 2014;6:198-201

How to cite this URL:
Hosseinpour M, Noori S, Amir-Beigi M, Pourfakharan MH, Ehteram H, Hamsayeh M. Safety of latex urinary catheters for the short time drainage. Urol Ann [serial online] 2014 [cited 2019 Dec 11];6:198-201. Available from: http://www.urologyannals.com/text.asp?2014/6/3/198/134257


   Introduction Top


Urinary catheters are used for diagnosing pathology in the lower urinary tract, to monitor urine output, and to relieve urinary retention. Short term (≤2 weeks) catheterization is used following some of urological surgery such as distal to mid shaft hypospadias to enable measurement of intra- and post-operative urine output and prevention of possible acute urinary retention following surgery [1],[2] due to swelling and pain. Indwelling urethral catheters were originally made of natural latex rubber, which was flexible and inexpensive. However, there are some controversies about the safety of these catheters in clinical practice. [3],[4],[5] Although some surgeons believe that Foley catheter can cause allergic reaction, hemorrhagic cystitis, but there are some studies that failed to show these effects in short-term catheterization. We also did not find any reports for evaluation of these effects on histological specimens to document these changes. Therefore, we conducted an animal study to compare the post-operative clinico-pathological complications between latex and silicone for short term catheterization in rabbits with hypospadias to identify the most appropriate catheter (silicone vs. latex) for short-term urinary catheterization.


   Materials and methods Top


Local research ethics committee approved the study. Forty rabbits were used in our study to compare complications of catheterization. White, male New Zealand rabbits (Razi institute, Tehran, Iran) weighing 1500 g were identified by numbering from 01 to 40, tattooed on the internal face of the right ear were selected. Rabbits were kept in a controlled environment (temperature: 24-26°C, humidity: 55-65%, fed a commercial pellet diet (Niro-sahand co, Tabriz, Iran) and allowed freely access to tap water until 4 h before surgery when feeding was discontinued.

They were divided into two groups (odds as group 1 (G1), evens as group (G2).

Anesthesia was done with intramuscular premedication of 2 mg/kg body weight acepromazine (30 min before anesthesia and 4 mg/kg body weight Xylazine associated with 40 mg/kg body weight ketamine intramuscularly.

Then the animal was placed in a horizontal dorsal decubitus on the surgical table and its paws fixed to the extremities of the table with thin ropes. With midline penile skin incision [6] from base to glans, preputial glands were mobilized to expose the urethra and corpora cavernosa. Then the vertical wall of the penile urethral was longitudinally opened for 1 cm in the midline. The dorsal urethral plate was visible and incised longitudinally in the midline for 1 cm without involving the underlying tunica albugina.

Hypospadias like defect was created by a 1 cm long excision of the ventral urethra. For urethroplasty, we used tubularized incised plate (TIP) technique in all rabbits as described by Lalla et al. [6] All procedures were performed at with 10 × magnification.

Latex and silicon catheters were used in G1 and G2, respectively (An 8 Fr catheter with a balloon).

Post-operatively, animals were kept in controlled environment for 10 days. Pre-operatively subcutaneous administration of sulfadiazine plus trimethoprime (4-8 mg/kg) was followed by post-operative administration daily for 10 days.

Routine laboratory urine test was performed on a regular basis. On post-operative assessment, number of post-operative complications (allergy, infection, bleeding) were recorded.

Allergy to catheter was diagnosed as red eyes, clear discharge from nose, and excessively touching of nose and face with paws.

Infection in the bladder or urinary tract [7] was diagnosed according to the following criteria as bloody urine (hematuria), thick, beige or brown-colored urine, increased white blood cell counts of urine, and positive urine culture.

Bleeding was defined as symptomatic urinary hemorrhage due to infection or inflammation.

After 10 days, rabbits were killed under general anesthesia by an intra-cardial overdose of pentobarbital and bladder necks were harvested. The bladder necks were fixed in 10% formalin. The isolated bladder neck in its expanded form was fixed, trimmed, and embedded in paraffin to prepare thin sections. Deparaffinized sections were stained with H and E and examined under light microscopy.

For pathological cystitis grading, six histological characteristics were graded (bladder epithelium denudation, submucosal edema, congestion and ectasia, inflammatory infiltrate, hemorrhage and fibrosis) as grade 0 (none) to 5 (severe). [8]

Hematuria was graded as [9] Grade 0: None, Grade 1: Microscopic only, Grade 2: Intermittent gross bleeding, no clots, Grade 3: Persistent gross bleeding or clots.

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (version 11.5). Data were expressed as mean ± SD for quantitative variables and percentage for qualitative ones.

The Mann-Whitney test was used to determine any difference in the mean scores. The relationship between qualitative scores and catheter type was investigated using two-tailed test and Fisher's exact test. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant.


   Results Top


A total of 40 rabbits underwent hypospadias repair. We have no mortality in our cases. In the first study group (G1), a latex catheter was placed in repaired urethra for 10 days. Animals in the second groups (G2) were catheterized by silicone catheters for the same period.

Laboratory urine test

[Table 1] shows the changes of red blood cell in urine test during indwelling urinary catheterization. Findings showed that there were no significant differences between groups based on urine test indices.
Table 1: Changes in blood cells in urine test during indwelling urinary catheterization

Click here to view


Clinical complications

One rabbit in G1 had allergic reaction to latex catheter. Urinary tract infection rate was 10% (2 rabbit) in G2 and 0% in G1 (P = NS). It seems that the type of catheter has no effect on urinary tract infection. [Table 2] shows the hematuria grades in groups, there was no significant differences between groups in short term catheterization (P = NS).
Table 2: Hematuria grading in groups

Click here to view


Post-mortem examination

[Table 3] shows the cystitis grading (none to severe) in groups. There were no significant differences between groups regarding of cystitis grades between study groups [Figure 1] and [Figure 2] (P = NS).
Figure 1: Microscopic findings of cystitis in latex group

Click here to view
Figure 2: Microscopic findings of cystitis in Silicone group

Click here to view
Table 3: Microscopic grading of cystitis in study groups

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


0While pediatric surgeon increasingly managing children with multiple and complex urological diseases such as hypospadias, it is important that they choose an appropriate catheter type for their patients. Despite the progress in hypospadias surgery, the choice of urine catheter to drain bladder is still controversially discussed.

Indwelling urethral catheters were originally made of natural latex rubber, which is flexible and inexpensive but other types of catheters such as silicone, [10] silastic, [11] polyvinylchloride, [12] and poly ethylene [13] and anti-microbial coated [14] are also used in clinical practice.

In this study, we conducted an animal investigation in an attempt to identify the most appropriate catheter (silicone vs. latex) for short-term urinary catheterization after hypospadias repair. Based on our knowledge our study is a unique study for evaluation of urinary catheter effects on histological changes in animal model.

Urinary tract inflammation

Indwelling catheters are almost invariably associated with characteristic mucosal lesions of urinary bladder, commonly referred to polypoid cystits. Our findings showed that there was no correlation between the type of catheter and mucosal lesions. This finding was also reported by Norlen et al. [15] They also showed that there was no correlation between the length of catheterization and mucosal lesions. It seems that mechanical irritation and/or pressure exerted by the catheter on the mucosa is responsible for the development of cystitis.

This mechanical/pressure mechanism was also showed by Abu-Yousef et al. [16] study as bulbous (thickened mucosa in early stage, redundant, and polypoid in late stage) in cystosonography. However, indwelling catheters initiate the accumulation and prevent drainage of urethral secretion causing urethritis, some studies showed that silicone catheters have a wider lumen and urethritis following short-term catheterization may be significantly reduced. [17]

We did not evaluate urethral histo-pathological changes in our animals and this would be one of the weaknesses of our study.

Although in Wei-yao report, [18] in comparison with latex catheter, silicone catheters caused less injuries and urinary mucosal irritation in patients who need long-term catheterization, however use of catheters in animal models for longer than 6 weeks showed no difference in inflammatory response between latex and silicone materials. [19]

Urinary tract infection

Although a variety of specialized antiseptic/antibiotic impregnated catheters have been designed to reduce the risk of UTI, but they are expensive and not achievable in every pediatric surgery ward.

In our study, there was no significant difference between groups for urinary tract infection in short- term course. This finding is similar to Schumm et al. study. [20] They also showed that there was not enough evidence to suggest whether or not any standard catheter was better than another in term of reducing the risk of UTI in hospitalized patients with short-term catheterization.

Although two studies showed that silicone catheters postpone bacteriuria and had the potential to minimize catheter related infection, but this result should be interpreted with some caution as the trials were small and the outcome definitions and compared specific catheters varied. [19] In one study, silver impregnated catheters were associated with more frequent bacteriuria and an increased risk of staphylococcal bacteriuria. [19]


   Conclusion Top


Based on our results, it seems that urinary tract catheterization with latex catheters is a safe, feasible, and in-expensive procedure for short-term post-operative course in hypospadias surgery in patients without latex hypersensitivity.

 
   References Top

1.Ramakrishan K, Mold JW. Urinary catheters: A review. Internet J Fam Pract 2005;3:1-29.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Lepor H. Managing and preventing acute urinary retention. Rev Urol 2005;7(Suppl 8): S26-33.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.Wilson M. Addressing the problems of long-term urethral catheterization: Part 2. Br J Nurs 2012;21:16,18-20, 22.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Wu AK, Blaschko SD, Garcia M, McAninch JW, Aaronson DS. Safer urethral catheters: How study of catheter balloon pressure and force can guide design. BJU Int 2012;109:1110-4.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Mizuno J, In-Nami H. 2009 Japanese Society of Latex Allergy guidelines for the safe management of latex allergy. Masui 2011;60:753-6.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Lalla M, Riis C, Jørgensen CS, Danielsen CC, Jørgensen TM. A biomechanical, histological and biochemical study in an experimental rabbit hypospadias repair model using scanning acoustic microscopy. J Pediatr Urol 2011;7:404-11.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Evliyaoðlu Y, Kobaner M, Celebi H, Yelsel K, Doðan A. The efficacy of a novel antibacterial hydroxyapatite nanoparticle-coated indwelling urinary catheter in preventing biofilm formation and catheter-associated urinary tract infection in rabbits. Urol Res 2011;39:443-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Rosamilia A, Igawa Y, Higashi S. Pathology of interstitial cystitis. Int J Urol 2003;10:S11-5.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program. Common toxicity criteria, Version 2.0 DCTD, NCI, NIH, DHHS March 1998.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Siddiq DM, Darouiche RO. New strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Nat Rev Urol 2012;9:305-14.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Walter JS, Wheeler JS, Wang X, Wurster RD. Balloon-tipped catheter for measuring urethral pressures. J Spinal Cord Med 2009;32:578-82.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Witjes JA, Del Popolo G, Marberger M, Jonsson O, Kaps HP, Chapple CR. A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel group study comparing polyvinyl chloride and polyvinyl chloride-free catheter materials. J Urol 2009;182:2794-8.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Sankar S, Rajalakshmi T. Application of poly ethylene glycol hydrogel to overcome latex urinary catheter related problems. Biofactors 2007;30:217-25.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Kowalczuk D, Gowin E, Miazga-Karska M. Quantitative evaluation of sparfloxacin binding to urological catheter surfaces. Pharmazie 2012;67:20-4.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Norlén LJ, Ekelund P, Hedelin H, Johansson SL. Effects of indwelling catheters on the urethral mucosa (polypoid urethritis). Scand J Urol Nephrol 1988;22:81-6.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Abu-Yousef MM, Narayana AS, brown RC. Catheter-induced cystitis: Evaluation by cystosonography. Radiology 1984;151:471-3.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]    
17.Talja M, Korpela A, Järvi K. Comparison of urethral reaction to full silicone, hydrogen-coated and siliconised latex catheters. Br J Urol 1990;66:652-7.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Huang WY, Wei LP, Ji YG, Xu DX, Mo JK. Effects of silicone and latex urinary catheters: A comparative study. Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao 2005;25:1026-8.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Cravens DD, Zweig S. Urinary catheter management. Am Fam Physician 2000;61:369-76.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Schumm K, Lam TB. Types of urethral catheters for management of short-term voiding problems in hospitalized adults: A short version Cochrane review. Neurol Urodyn 2008;27:738-46.  Back to cited text no. 20
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and me...
   Results
   Conclusion
   Discussion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2130    
    Printed41    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded370    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal