Urology Annals
About UA | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Online submissionLogin 
Urology Annals
  Editorial Board | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact
Users Online: 384   Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 1-7

Orthotopic neobladder reconstruction


1 Department of Urology, Fremantle Hospital and Health Service, Fremantle, Western Australia
2 Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne; Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria; Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia

Correspondence Address:
Nathan Lawrentschuk
Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Austin Hospital, Suite 5, 210 Burgundy St., Heidelberg VIC 3084, Australia

Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/0974-7796.148553

PMID: 25657535

Rights and Permissions

Orthotopic neobladder reconstruction is becoming an increasingly common urinary diversion following cystectomy for bladder cancer. This is in recognition of the potential benefits of neobladder surgery over creation of an ileal conduit related to quality of life (QoL), such as avoiding the need to form a stoma with its cosmetic, psychological and other potential complications. The PubMed database was searched using relevant search terms for articles published electronically between January 1994 and April 2014. Full-text articles in English or with English translation were assessed for relevance to the topic before being included in the review. Patients with neobladders have comparable or better post-operative sexual function than those with ileal conduits. They also have comparable QoL to those with ileal conduits. Orthotopic neobladder is a good alternative to ileal conduit in suitable patients who do not want a stoma and are motivated to comply with neobladder training. However, the selection of a neobladder as the urinary diversion of choice requires that patients have good renal and liver functions and are likely to be compliant with neobladder training. With benefits also come potential risks of neobladder formation. These include electrolyte abnormalities and nocturnal incontinence. This short review highlights current aspects of neobladder formation and its potential advantages.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4344    
    Printed71    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded756    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal