Urology Annals
About UA | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Online submissionLogin 
Urology Annals
  Editorial Board | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact
Users Online: 390   Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size


 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 41-45  

Long-term complications of JJ stent and its management: A 5 years review


Department of Urology, IPGMER and SSKM Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

Date of Submission02-Jun-2014
Date of Acceptance14-Aug-2014
Date of Web Publication6-Jan-2015

Correspondence Address:
Rajendra Prasad Ray
Doctor Hostel, IPGMER and SSKM Hospital, 242 AJC Bose Road, Kolkata - 700 020, West Bengal
India
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/0974-7796.148599

PMID: 25657542

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Objectives: To assess the long term complications of JJ stent, the management of complications and the role of endoscopic approach to manage these complications.
Materials and Methods: Nineteen patients with indwelling JJ stent for a duration of more than 6 months were included in this study. Patients were assessed with X-ray KUB, USG KUB, blood urea, creatinine and DTPA renogram. Data were analyzed by Microsoft excel 2007 .
Results:
Out of 19 patients 12 (63.16%) were male and 7 (36.84%) were female. The mean age was 39.78 ± 13.69 years., Mean duration for which the stent was in situ was 29.56 months. The most common complication was broken stent, in 11 cases (57.89%). Other complications were migration in 5 (26.32%), encrustation in 2 (10.52%) and 1 case of (5.26%) stone formation. Eighteen cases were managed by endoscopic approaches. A total of 22 procedures were performed to treat the complications. Eleven cases were managed by a single procedure and 8 patients required multiple procedures. All were managed successfully with no death reported. Post-operative complications were seen in eight cases (42.11%).
Conclusions: JJ stent related long-term complications are not uncommon and are usually seen after 6 months of indwelling time. Endourological procedure should be the initial approach with a high success rate. Coordinated use multimodality and technology helps in management of difficult cases. Open surgery is rarely required. Prevention of the complication by judicious use and early removal is the cornerstone.

Keywords: Complication, JJ stent, management, prevention


How to cite this article:
Ray RP, Mahapatra RS, Mondal PP, Pal DK. Long-term complications of JJ stent and its management: A 5 years review. Urol Ann 2015;7:41-5

How to cite this URL:
Ray RP, Mahapatra RS, Mondal PP, Pal DK. Long-term complications of JJ stent and its management: A 5 years review. Urol Ann [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 May 27];7:41-5. Available from: http://www.urologyannals.com/text.asp?2015/7/1/41/148599


   Introduction Top


JJ stent is widely used in urological practice. It was first described in 1967 by Zimskind et al. [1] Ureteric stents are not complication free. Stent related complications are primarily mechanical; including stent migration, encrustation, stone formation and fragmentation. Stents act as foreign bodes and may cause urinary tract infection, pyonephrosis that may lead to nonfunctioning kidney. Therefore, ureteral stent should be removed as early as possible after it serves its purpose or changed frequently as per the need to reduce stent related complication and morbidity. Managing complication itself has its own inherent consequences and that led understand urologist to prevent it by timely removal or change of the JJ stent. We studied the complications related to JJ stent, the possible etiologies, treatment options, role of endourological procedures and prevention of such problems. Our objective is to assess the long term complications and to assess the role of endoscopic approach to manage the complications. It will help in understanding the importance of prevention of complication by judicious use of JJ stent.


   Material and methods Top


This is a retrospective study which was conducted in Dept of Urology, IPGMER and SSKM Hospital, a tertiary centre of West Bengal, India from January 2008 to June 2013. Nineteen patients referred to our institution with more than 6 months of JJ stent placement were included in this study. We performed a plain X-ray KUB, USG KUB, blood urea, creatinine, and DTPA renogram if hydronephrosis or raised urea, creatinine was found. Data were collected from departmental register. Analysis was done by Microsoft office excels 2007.


   Results Top


Out of the 19 patients 12 (63.16%) were male and 7 (36.84%) were female. [Table 1] summarizes the clinical parameters of the patients. The mean age was 39.9 years, with a range 10-58 years. Mean duration of the stent in situ was 29.89 months ranging from 7 months to 156 months. The most common complication was broken stent in 11 (57.89%). Other complications were migration in 5 (26.32%), encrustation in 2 (10.52%) and 1 case of (5.26%) stone formation. Eighteen 18 (94.74%) cases were managed by endoscopic approaches and only 1 case require open procedure. In the later case, the forgotten JJ stent fragmented and migrated down with knotting formation causing obstruction of right ureter and had to resorted open ureterotomy as attempt of ureteroscopic removal failed [Figure 1]. A total of 22 procedures were performed to treat the complications. In 57.89% (n = 11) cases single procedure was sufficient to effectively manage the complications, and 42.11% (n = 8) required multiple procedures. Cystoscopic removal of fragmented stent from the bladder was done in 9 cases, ureteroscopy was done in six cases for ureteric fragments of stent or ureteric migration of stent, ESWL in two encrusted stent followed by cystoscopic removal of those stents [Figure 2], and two cases of fragmented stent with stone formation in kidney removed by PCNL [Figure 3]. Antegrade removal of retained fragment in the pelvis or upper ureter was done in two cases. In one of them as there were reimplanted ureters for vesicoureteric reflux, the attempt of ureteroscopy was failed and upper fragment of stent removed through percutaneous nephrostomy [Figure 4]. All were managed successfully with no death reported. Although post-operative complications were seen in eight cases (42.11%). Infections were most common and was seen in 62.5% (n = 5). Sepsis was seen in 1 case.
Figure 1: Stent fragmented and migrated down with knotting causing obstruction of the right upper ureter

Click here to view
Figure 2: Left over stent in patient with stone former for 2 years with encrustation

Click here to view
Figure 3: Stone formation in retained small fragment of JJ stent for 3 years

Click here to view
Figure 4: Forgotten bilateral stents for 13 years with fragmentation and migration

Click here to view
Table 1: Patients characteristics

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


JJ stent is commonly used in urological practice since its first introduction. It is usually kept for (4-6 weeks) short term period to help in the healing of ureter, drainage of urine and prevent narrowing during healing. Short term use of JJ stent associated with short lived mild complications, whereas long term complications are more severe, particularly when it is placed for more than 6 months duration. Although Ideal stent should have many properties, with low complication rate and should not cause irritative symptoms, it is yet not be possible to manufacture. [2] Most common stent related complication is ''stent syndrome''. [3] It is a constellation of clinical symptoms: Flank pain, frequency, urgency, suprapubic discomfort and sometime with hematuria or incontinence. Stent syndrome is primarily due to physical characteristics of stent and the improper size selection. Stent acts as a foreign body that irritates the ureteral and bladder wall. Extra length or coil may impinge on the trigone causing irritative voiding symptoms, hematuria or suprapubic pain. Ureteral peristalsis against the stent may cause flank pain or uereteric colic. [3],[4] Although it is short lived but may cause of high morbidity in stented patients. Several tools have been described to assess the stent syndrome (International Prostatic Symptoms Score, IPSS; The Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire, USSQ). [4],[5],[6] Although selection of the proper stent and the proper size is the prerequisite to reduce the complication, alpha 1 -blockers for treating these symptoms has been used with good results. [6]

Long-term complications are associated with prolonged indwelling times. Some time forgotten or overlooked stent may jeopardize the function of the kidney. With the passage of time all stents lose tensile strength, cracks are started at the holes resulting in fracture of the stents. [7] Zisman et al. found a decreased elongation at break of the retrieved polyurethane stents, and hypothesized that it is due to the accelerated aging process of stent material. [8] Although broken stent is a less commonly reported, [3] it is most common complication seen in our series. We found 57.89% cases with broken JJ stent. Breakage occurs in those who had JJ stent for long duration ranging from 15 to 156 months. In contrast, Damiano et al., found a relative lower incidence of fracture stent, only 1.3%. [9] Similar result was (4.79%) also shown by Ikram Ullah et al. [10] Monga et al. has shown a higher rate of fragmented JJ stent in their series. He counted 45% fragmented and another 14% fragmented and calcified. Mean duration of JJ stent was 22.7 months in their series. [11] Although broken JJ stent is relatively less common in most reported series, we found more than 50% presented with fragmented stent. It may be due to prolonged indwelling time (42.73 month) and also heterogeneity of JJ stent used in our area. Since all the cases were referred to our institution, the make and design of these stents were not known. It is seen that different types of JJ stent and of different manufacturer are being used in this eastern part of India. However, the definite reason of fragmentation is unclear. Although it does impact on rate and the type of complication. Silicone stent is resistant to biofilm formation and encrustation is less likely. Because of its softness and elasticity, patient feels more comfortable. On the other hand, polyurethane stents are rigid, easy manageable during placement but cause patient discomfort and may cause ureteral erosion.

Stent migration is a recognized complication. It is related to JJ stent design and faulty technique of insertion. Double pigtail stents are less likely to migrate as opposed to J loop stent. Migration can occur either way but upward migration is more common. [3] Upward migration is primarily due to placement of stent too short for the ureter. [12],[13] Other causes of migration are renal ureteric dynamics, peristalsis and incorrect size selection. [14] The incidence of stent migration in our study is much higher than it is reported. Damiano et al. reported stent migration 9.5%. [9] We found a high incidence of 26.32% with mean duration was 9 months. Nawaz et al. and Ikram Ullah et al. also reported low incidence of stent migration at rate of 3.5% and 6.84%, respectively. [10] The high incidence in our study population possibly due to incorrect positioning and improper size selection. This complication can be avoided by pulling the stent cystoscopicaly keeping the full loop into the bladder [3] and stent should be in the pelvis not into the calyx. [15]

Stone encrustation is another problem in long term use. Polyurethane stent are more prone to encrustation. Encrustation is more common where stent use for stone disease, but it may also occur due to biofilm formation by the bacteria. Because of their rigidity poly urethane stents tend to encourage stasis with formation of encrustation. These encrustations consist mainly of calcium oxalate, calcium phosphate and ammonium magnesium phosphate. [16] Risk factors are chronic recurrent stone formers with a lithogenic history, uricosuria, chronic renal failure, congenital anomalies, urinary tract infection, stasis, dehydration and long indwelling times. [14] El-Faqih et al. reported stent encrustation rate increases with indwelling time and it is 9.2% for an indwelling time of less than 6 weeks to 47.5% at 6 to 12 weeks to 76.3% at more than 12 weeks. [17] We found only 2 (10.52%) of our study patient presented with this complication. In both the cases JJ stent were used for stone disease. Although others reported higher incidence rate, ranging from 10.5 to 15%. [10] It is seen that Silicone stent is more resistant to biofilm formation and so encrustation is less likely. Stent replacement prior to the time of expected encrustation is the only effective method of preventing encrustation.

Stone formation in a left over stent or fragment is also a common complication. Stone formation primarily seen in patients who are increase risk for stone formation and also with long indwelling time. Dehydration, stent blockage, urinary tract infection, chronic renal failure may also contribute stone formation. We found 1 case, where stone formed in small retained fragment of JJ stent after 36 months.

Management of complicated stents requires coordinated use of medical, lithotripsy and endourological techniques or open surgery. JJ stent related complications are primarily managed by endoscopic procedure with a high success rate. PCNL and URS are often necessary in cases of encrusted stent or stone formation over JJ stent. Open or laparoscopic procedure is only required if endoscopic procedure is failed. Nephrectomy is resorted to cases with non-functioning kidney. 94.74% of our cases were managed endoscopically with 57.89% success rate by single procedure and requiring multiple procedures in rest of the cases (42.11%). Open procedure was required in one case following failed attempted URS, where there was fragmentation with knotting of stent in ureter. Rabani has shown similar result. [18]

Although successful management of these complications done by endourological means in majority of cases with minimal complications, the best treatment would be prevention from this complication. It can easily be done by recognizing the fact that basic factor is forgotten or long term placement of JJ stent. So it is always advisable not to use JJ stent when unnecessary, and to remove or replace at earliest.

The following measures can be adopted to increase the compliance of the patient: [14]

  1. Counseling of the patient about JJ stent and its potential complication if left indwelling for a prolonged interval
  2. Selection of the appropriate stent size
  3. Giving Post procedure X-ray to the patient to show the stent left in the body
  4. Maintaining log of the patients with JJ stent to ensure timely replace or removal [19]
  5. Further imaging was necessary both medically and legally to exclude a retained stent or part of a stent.



   Conclusion Top


Serious complication of JJ stent is related to indwelling time and commonly seen in forgotten stent, particularly in poor compliant patients. Although majority can be managed by endourological procedure, prevention from this complication should be the goal. Patient's education regarding the stent and its complication and compliance may play a great role.

 
   References Top

1.
Zimskind PD, Fetter TR, Wilkerson JL. Clinical use of long-term indwelling silicone rubber ureteral splints inserted cystoscopically. J Urol 1967;97:840-4.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Denstedt JD, Reid G, Sofer M. Advances in ureteral stent technology. World J Urol 2000;18:237-42.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Lawrentschuk N, Russel JM. Ureteric stenting 25 years on: Routine or risky? ANZ J Surg 2004;74:243-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Miyaoka R, Monga M. Ureteral stent discomfort: Etiology and management. Indian J Urol 2009;25:455-60.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
5.
Joshi HB, Stainthorpe A, Keeley FX, Macdonagh R, Timoney AG. Indwelling ureteral stents: Evaluation of quality of life to aid outcome analysis. J Endourol 2001;15:151-4.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Deliveliotis C, Chrisofos M, Gougousis E, Papatsoris A, Dellis A, Varkarakis IM. Is there a role for alpha1-blockers in treating double-J stent-related symptoms? Urology 2006;67:35-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Kumar M, Aron M, Aggarwal AK, Gupta NP. Stenturia: An unusual manifestation of spontaneous ureteral stent fragmentation. Urol Int 1999;62:114-6.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Zisman A, Siegel YI, Siegmann A, Lindner A. Spontaneous ureteral stent fragmentation. J Urol 1995;153:718-21.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Damiano R, Oliva A, Esposito C, De Sio M, Autorino R, D′Armiento M. Early and late complications of double pigtail ureteral stent. Urol Int 2002;69:136-40.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Ullah I, Alam K, Wazir BG, Shah F, Nawaz A, Malik A. Indications and Morbidity of Indwelling Ureteral Stenting. Ann Pak Inst Med Sci 2011;7:173-5.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Monga M, Klein E, Castañeda-Zúñiga WR, Thomas R. The forgotten indwelling ureteral stent: A urological dilemma. J Urol 1995;153:1817-9.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Bhatia V, Biyani CS. Pan proximal migration of ureteral stent: Case report. East Afr Med J 1993;70:531.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Breau RH, Norman RW. Optimal prevention and management of proximal ureteral stent migration and remigration. J Urol 2001;166:890-3.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Singh I. Indwelling JJ ureteral stents - a current perspective and review of literature. Indian J Surg 2003;65:405-12.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Oswalt GC Jr, Bueschen AJ, Lloyd IK. Upward migration of indwelling ureteral stents. J Urol 1979;122:249-50.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Robert M, Boularan AM, El Sandid M, Grasset D. Double-J ureteric stent encrustations: Clinical study on crystal formation on polyurethane stents. Urol Int 1997;58:100-4.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
el-Faqih SR, Shamsuddin AB, Chakrabarti A, Atassi R, Kardar AH, Osman MK, et al. Polyurethane internal stents in treatment of stone patients: Morbidity related to indwelling times. J Urol 1991;146:1487-91.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Rabani SM. Combined percutaneous and transurethral lithotripsy for forgotten ureteral stents with giant encrustation. Nephrourol Mon 2012;4:633-5.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Finney RP. Experience with new double J ureteral catheter stent. J Urol 1978;120:678-81.  Back to cited text no. 19
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Material and methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3297    
    Printed44    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded412    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal