Urology Annals
About UA | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Online submissionLogin 
Urology Annals
  Editorial Board | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact
Users Online: 871   Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size


 
Table of Contents
CASE REPORT
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 504-506  

Nephron-sparing surgery in case of emphysematous pyelonephritis


Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Sri Aurobindo Institute of Medical Sciences, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India

Date of Submission01-Jan-2015
Date of Acceptance04-Mar-2015
Date of Web Publication14-Oct-2015

Correspondence Address:
Santosh Agrawal
Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Sri Aurobindo Institute of Medical Sciences, Indore, Madhya Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/0974-7796.162211

PMID: 26692674

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Emphysematous pyelonephritis is fatal necrotizing infection where life saving emergency nephrectomy is recommended for severe cases, but we performed nephron sparing surgery. Elderly diabetic female presented with left flank pain and fever for 15 days. On examination tender lump was palpable in left lumbar region. Investigations showed hyperglycemia, leucocytosis and creatinine 3.0 mg/dl. NCCT-KUB suggested class 3B-EPN. Following emergency pigtail, a repeat CT-scan suggested upper and lower pole destruction. In open drainage both poles debrided with sparing of middle pole. Follow-up CECT-KUB showed spared kidney with normal function. No literature for nephron sparing surgery in similar cases of EPN was found.

Keywords: Emphysematous pyelonephritis, nephron-sparing, percutaneous drainage


How to cite this article:
Kalathia J, Chipde SS, Agrawal S, Agrawal R. Nephron-sparing surgery in case of emphysematous pyelonephritis. Urol Ann 2015;7:504-6

How to cite this URL:
Kalathia J, Chipde SS, Agrawal S, Agrawal R. Nephron-sparing surgery in case of emphysematous pyelonephritis. Urol Ann [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 Jan 22];7:504-6. Available from: http://www.urologyannals.com/text.asp?2015/7/4/504/162211


   Introduction Top


Emphysematous pyelonephritis (EPN) is severe, acute necrotizing infection of the kidney characterized by the presence of gas within the renal parenchyma, collecting system, and perirenal tissues.[1] EPN is common in uncontrolled diabetics, especially in females.

Till mid-1980s, the standard treatment was nephrectomy of the affected kidney because efforts in preserving the kidney by nonsurgical treatment led to mortality of up to 60–80%.[2] The situation has changed in the last 2 decades with diagnosis by computed tomography (CT) scan and advances in multi-disciplinary approach with the overall mortality estimated to be 20–25%.[2] Though emergency nephrectomy is recommended for higher CT-scan class of EPN, but we performed the nephron-sparing surgery with excellent outcome.


   Case Report Top


A 60-year-old female presented with complaints of progressively increasing left flank pain, high-grade fever, and associated burning micturition for the last 15 days. She also complained of weakness. Patient was a known case of diabetes mellitus and on hypoglycemic agents for the last 2 years. On examination, patient was febrile, pale looking, and had tachycardia of 100/min. Abdominal examination showed a large palpable lump in the left lumbar region with severe tenderness associated with inflammatory changes.

The routine investigations showed increased blood sugar level (250 mg/dl), serum creatinine (3 mg/dl), and increased leukocytes. Ultrasound abdomen showed mild dilation of the pelvicalyceal system of the left kidney. The noncontrast CT-kidneys, ureters, and bladder (KUB) suggested Class 3B EPN involving the left kidney with gross peri-renal collection [Figure 1]a. Emergency pigtail insertion was done. The discharge was purulent for the next 3–4 days which slowly turned to urinous. Patient's clinical condition improved and the investigations including the serum creatinine and total leukocyte count returned to the base line. The culture report from the drain was negative. The pigtail showed clear urine around one liter. A repeat contrast-enhanced CT (CECT)-KUB was done after 1 week which showed destruction in the upper and lower pole with spared middle pole [Figure 1]b. Patient was taken up for open drainage through the left flank incision. Intraoperatively, multiple perinephric pus pockets with completely destroyed upper and lower pole of the kidney were noted [Figure 2]a. The middle pole of the kidney showed good parenchyma. Both the upper and lower pole were debrided and left open with a perinephric drain, as there was no intraoperative leakage of urine. Postoperatively, there was continuous urinous drain output around one liter, so a double J stent was placed. The drain output gradually decreased, and the patient was discharged with drain. In the follow-up period at 1-month, the drain output completely stopped and was removed. The stent was removed at 6 weeks postoperatively. The repeat CECT-KUB done at 2 months showed the spared kidney with good parenchyma and normal function [Figure 2]b.
Figure 1: (a) Noncontrast computed tomography (CT)-kidneys, ureters, and bladder (KUB) suggesting Class 3B emphysematous pyelonephritis involving the left kidney with gross peri-renal collection. (b) Contrast-enhanced CT-KUB shows destruction of the upper and lower pole with spared middle pole

Click here to view
Figure 2: (a) Perinephric pus pockets with completely destroyed upper and lower pole of the kidney with spared middle lobe. (b) Contrast-enhanced computed tomography-kidneys, ureters, and bladder at 2 months showing the spared kidney with good parenchyma and normal function

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Emphysematous pyelonephritis characterized by the presence of gas in the renal system, most often in the parenchyma, but also extending to surrounding perinephric tissues. The term EPN was first used by Schultz and Klorfein. It is usually caused by  Escherichia More Details coli (70%). 95% of patients with EPN have uncontrolled diabetes mellitus.[3]

High mortality is associated with factors such as blood pressure <90 mmHg, altered mental status, increase in serum creatinine, thrombocytopenia, bilateral disease, and patients managed conservatively with antibiotics. The patients of EPN have symptoms of a typical pyelonephritis. Patients in severe conditions may present in acute renal failure or septic shock. The CT-scan designates the amount of gas, the destruction of the renal parenchyma, the presence of fluid collections and fluid-gas levels as well as the underlying cause of urinary tract obstruction. EP is classified according to Huang and Tseng into five categories.[4] In Type-1 gas is confined in the pyelocalyceal system only. In Type-2 gas is found in the renal parenchyma. In Type-3A gas extents into the perinephric space and in Type-3B into the pararenal space. Finally, in Type-4, EP affects a solitary kidney or the infection is bilateral. Our case was Type 3B according to this classification where the gas was extending into the pararenal space in which usually nephrectomy is recommended as life-saving procedure.

The approach in treating patients with EPN has changed over the years with advances in medical imaging, interventional radiology and newer more effective antibiotic therapy. The recent reviews of management of EPN propose that percutaneous drainage should be part of initial management strategy for EPN.[5] Our patient was managed in accordance with the current evidence-based protocols where she was started initially with broad-spectrum antibiotics followed by percutaneous drainage. This initial medical management strategy improved the patient's condition clinically with blood investigations returning to baseline. The follow-up CT scans showed spared middle pole which deferred our plan to nephron-sparing surgery instead of nephrectomy.


   Conclusion Top


Emergency nephrectomy is usually recommended in extensive EPN, but nephron-sparing surgery can be attempted in a viable kidney with due risk as we did in our case with excellent outcome.

Source of Support:

Nil

Conflict of Interest:

None.

 
   References Top

1.
Wan YL, Lee TY, Bullard MJ, Tsai CC. Acute gas-producing bacterial renal infection: Correlation between imaging findings and clinical outcome. Radiology 1996;198:433-8.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Hooton T. Urinary tract infections in adults. In: Jurgen F, Johnson RJ, Feehally J, editors. Comprehensive Clinical Nephrology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier Inc.; 2010. p. 638-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Ubee SS, McGlynn L, Fordham M. Emphysematous pyelonephritis. BJU Int 2011;107:1474-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Huang JJ, Tseng CC. Emphysematous pyelonephritis: Clinicoradiological classification, management, prognosis, and pathogenesis. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:797-805.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Pontin AR, Barnes RD. Current management of emphysematous pyelonephritis. Nat Rev Urol 2009;6:272-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Report
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1642    
    Printed58    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded159    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal