Urology Annals
About UA | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Online submissionLogin 
Urology Annals
  Editorial Board | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact
Users Online: 776   Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size


 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 26-30  

Urologic complications following obstetrics and gynecologicai surgery: Our experience in a tertiary care hospital


Department of Urology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

Date of Submission12-Feb-2015
Date of Acceptance03-May-2015
Date of Web Publication10-Dec-2015

Correspondence Address:
Dilip Kumar Pal
Department of Urology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, 244, AJC Bose Road, Kolkata . 700 020, West Bengal
India
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/0974-7796.158502

PMID: 26834397

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Introduction: Urinary tract injuries are a known complication of obstetrical and gynecological surgeries because of their anatomical proximity. Delayed diagnosis and improper management leads to high morbidity and even mortality. This is our three year's experience of urological complications after obstetric and gynecological surgery, their treatment and follows up.
Materials and Methods: We reviewed all cases of urological injuries managed in our department that were deemed to be of obstetric and gynecological origins.
Results: Thirty seven women were treated in the department for urological complications secondary to obstetric and gynecological procedures from January 2012 to December 2014. The most common organ involved was urinary bladder, occurring in 54% patients followed by ureter in 35.13%. Vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) was the most common injury involving the bladder occurring in nineteen patients. Ureterovaginal fistula (UVF) occurred in nine patients and acute ureteric injury in three. Hysterectomy was the most common etiology occurring in 60% cases followed by obstetrical causes in 40% cases. All cases were successfully managed both with open surgery or laparoscopic surgery.
Conclusion: Although obstetrical causes are still important in developing countries, gynecological procedures especially laparoscopic surgeries are on the rise. In these procedures the suspicion of urological injuries should be kept in mind and intra-operative detection and early repair should be attempted. Delayed diagnosis and improper treatment leads to severe complications.

Keywords: Gynecological surgery, iatrogenic injuries, urological complications


How to cite this article:
Pal DK, Wats V, Ghosh B. Urologic complications following obstetrics and gynecologicai surgery: Our experience in a tertiary care hospital. Urol Ann 2016;8:26-30

How to cite this URL:
Pal DK, Wats V, Ghosh B. Urologic complications following obstetrics and gynecologicai surgery: Our experience in a tertiary care hospital. Urol Ann [serial online] 2016 [cited 2020 May 31];8:26-30. Available from: http://www.urologyannals.com/text.asp?2016/8/1/26/158502


   Introduction Top


Operative injuries to the urinary tract are common in gynecological surgery due to the proximity of the urogenital organ systems. Urinary tract injury constitutes an estimated 0.2–1% of all gynecologic procedures and pelvic operations.[1] Urinary tract injuries due to obstetric and gynecologic surgery are normally classified into two categories: Acute complications, such as bladder or ureteric injury that can be identified and repaired immediately during the operation, and chronic complications such as vesicovaginal fistula (VVF), ureterovaginal fistula (UVF) which can surface days to months after primary surgery. The rate of clinically apparent ureteral injuries ranges from 0.2% to 2.5% for routine gynecologic pelvic operation and 10–30% for radical procedures in malignant conditions.[2] Genitourinary fistula, although rare in the industrialized world, still continues to plague women in the third world countries like India. In developing countries, including India, 90% of these fistulas are a consequence of neglected and obstructed labor.[3] Complex minimally invasive endoscopic and laparoscopic procedures are being carried out increasingly by urologists to treat all these complications.

This study was performed to investigate the cause and management of urologic complications following obstetric and gynecologic surgery in order to prevent future occurrences of same.


   Materials and Methods Top


From January 2012 to December 2014, 37 patients with genitourinary injuries following obstetric and gynecologic surgery were treated in the Department of Urology at a tertiary care hospital in Eastern India. A detailed history was taken and clinical examination performed in all patients.

While reviewing, we explored the site of injury, its etiologic characteristics, and the type of therapy undertaken and of course, the success rate of the therapeutic maneuver.

Urological complications were defined as laceration, transection, rupture, or ligation of the genitourinary tract found during surgery or as hydronephrosis, and leakage of contrast media out of the urinary tract found after surgery. Success of the repair was the criterion for successful treatment.

Patients were followed-up in the outpatient clinic at 1, 3, and 6 months with detailed history, physical examination, complete urinalyses, and urine cultures at each visit. Serum creatinine was done at 3 months follow-up. Patients with positive urine cultures received appropriate antibiotic therapy. Follow-up intravenous urography was performed 3 months after treatment.


   Results Top


Mean age of the patients were 32 years (range: 19–58 years). Thirty-one out of 37 patients (83.78%) treated by us had delayed complications like fistulas. Acute complications of bladder and ureter occurred in 6 patients (16.21%). The most common type of injury involved bladder, occurring in 20 patients (54.05%), followed by ureter in 13 patients (35.13%), then bladder along with ureter in 3 patients (8.10%) and least in urethra 1 patient (2.7%). Of 20 patients of bladder injury, 19 patients (95%) were of VVF and 1 patient (5%) of acute bladder laceration.

Of 13 cases of ureteric injury, UVF occurred in 9 patients (69.23%), acute ureteric injury in 3 patients (23.07%), and ureteric stricture in 1 patient (7.69%). Nine patients had left ureteric injury and 4 had a right ureteric injury. In all cases of ureteric injury preoperative retrograde pyelography and retrograde double J (DJ) stenting was attempted first. After failure of the endourological procedure, surgery was undertaken in the same sitting.

Hysterectomy was the cause of urological injury in 22 patients (59.45%) and 15 patients (40.54%) had obstetrical causes. In 22 cases of hysterectomy, 9 patients (40.9%) had undergone a laparoscopic hysterectomy. Of 22 patients, 15 had a history of surgery in the form of caesarean section in the past.

In our series, patients were treated with both open and laparoscopic procedures. In acute complications, one bladder injury was repaired using laparoscopic transabdominal repair with 100% success rate. Of 3 acute ureteric injuries, one had laceration which was managed successfully with primary repair plus DJ stenting. Two patients had complete transection which were repaired using open ureteroneocystostomy and DJ stenting. Two patients had combined bladder and ureteric injuries which were repaired successfully with open primary bladder repair and ureteroneocystostomy.

Of 19 cases of VVF, 11 were repaired using laparoscopic transabdominal repair, 7 were treated with open transabdominal O'Connor repair and 1 through vaginal route with martius flap. 18 patients (94.73%) were treated successfully. One case, which failed was earlier repaired using a laparoscopic approach which was later successfully managed using open transabdominal approach. All 9 cases of UVF were repaired by transabdominal laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy. One case of combined VVF plus UVF was repaired by open transabdominal O'Connor bivalve repair. [Figure 1] shows two VVFs after bivalving urinary bladder in Laparoscopic repair. These two fistulas were joined and repaired as one. [Figure 2] shows completed VVF repair using a laparoscopic approach. [Figure 3] shows VVF using vaginal approach. [Figure 4] shows the closure of urinary bladder in VVF repair using vaginal approach.
Figure 1: Two vesicovaginal fistula's seen in laparoscopic repair after bivalving urinary bladder (first with white guidewire, second with grey guidewire)

Click here to view
Figure 2: Completed repair of vesicovaginal fistula using laparoscopic approach

Click here to view
Figure 3: Vaginal approach used for delineating vesicovaginal fistula

Click here to view
Figure 4: After closure of urinary bladder in vesicovaginal fistula repair using vaginal approach

Click here to view


One case of urethra vaginal fistula was managed using the vaginal route with martius flap. One case of ureteric stricture was managed with primary ureteroureterostomy.

In follow-up, all patients were asymptomatic and with normal radiological findings.


   Discussion Top


The anatomic proximity of the reproductive and lower urinary system predisposes it to iatrogenic injuries during obstetric and gynecological surgery. In our series, [Table 1] shows the type of surgery performed and its relation to site of injury and [Table 2] shows management.
Table 1: Type of surgery performed in patients with urinary tract injury

Click here to view
Table 2: Primary management of urinary tract injuries

Click here to view


The most commonly injured organ was urinary bladder in 54.05% patients. Bladder laceration was detected intraoperatively in one patient during laparoscopic hysterectomy which was then managed by primary laparoscopic repair. Two other cases of concomitant urinary bladder and ureteric injury were detected intraoperatively during radical abdominal hysterectomy for which open primary bladder repair and ureteroneocystostomy was done. All cases were successfully treated. Ureteral injury recognized at time of hysterectomy occurs most commonly with radical abdominal hysterectomy (7.7 per 1000) and total abdominal hysterectomy (1.2 per 1000) and least commonly with laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (0 per 1000).[4]

Nineteen cases of bladder injury presented to us in the form of VVF. This is in contrast to most series where the most common form of injury is intra-operative detection of urinary bladder laceration and it is treated by primary bladder repair.[5] This difference may be because our hospital is a tertiary care referral center for East India and therefore only complex urological cases like fistulas which are difficult to treat in primary and secondary care centers are being referred to us.

Out of 19 cases of VVF, 18 cases were supratrigonal and one case was intertrigonal. Eleven patients (57.9%) had obstetrical causes like obstructed labor, caesarean section. Five patients (26.3%) had an open hysterectomy and 3 patients (15.8%) had a laparoscopic hysterectomy. In developing countries, obstetrical VVFs remain a major medical problem because of low standard of antenatal and obstetric care.[6] Obstetrical fistulas cause "field injury" to a larger area as compared to postsurgical patients therefore producing a larger fistula.[7]

Vesicovaginal fistula patients presented themselves to us after a varying period of 4 months to as long as 10 years after primary surgery. There is no consensus about the timing or surgical technique of fistula repair.[8] The classical view is to delay the repair for 3–6 months to allow the inflammation to subside. Eleven patients were treated with transabdominal transvesical laparoscopic VVF repair [9] while seven were treated with transabdominal open repair using O'Connor bivalve technique.[10] These include the two patients who had a failed VVF repair and the one who was treated by transvaginal approach with martius flap.[11] In all the cases of abdominal surgery, omental flap interpositioning was done. Laparoscopic surgery advantages include decreased convalescence, shorter hospitalization times, and decreased pain requirements. The main drawback is the steep learning curve associated with laparoscopy.[12] In our patients undergoing laparoscopic VVF repair, fistula size ranged from 1 cm to 3.5 cm (mean: 2.2 ± 0.9). Mean operative time was 157 ± 29.8 min (range: 110–210) and estimated blood loss was 73.8 ± 18.2 ml (range: 45–110). One patient in our series had a failed VVF repair after laparoscopic repair but was repaired after 3 months successfully using open transabdominal O'Connors bivalve technique.[10]

In our series, 9 patients with UVFs were treated using laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy. Of these patients 5 underwent laparoscopic abdominal hysterectomy, 3 had an open abdominal hysterectomy and 1 had a vaginal hysterectomy. These patients presented themselves to us 2–8 weeks after the primary surgery with symptoms ranging from urinary incontinence in 8 patients and urosepsis in one patient. In all the cases, retrograde DJ stenting was tried initially, but because of failure in the process, laparoscopic repair was undertaken as soon as the patient condition permitted. In our series, mean operative time was 212 min (range: 170–310) and estimated blood loss was 108 ml (range: 70–150). In all the patients, DJ stent was removed after 4 weeks and voiding cystogram done at 3 months. All the cases were successfully managed.

The incidence of iatrogenic ureteral injuries in laparoscopy has increased owing to the increasing complexity of laparoscopic surgeries and retroperitoneal dissection. Gynecologic pelvic surgery is now the most common cause of iatrogenic ureteral injury. The risk of ureteric injury occurs to be the greatest during laparoscopic hysterectomy.[13] Open surgery for the reconstruction of the lower ureter has been described as a gold standard for management of lower ureteric obstruction. Although technically difficult, laparoscopic re-implantation has become a feasible option for management of such injuries. The laparoscopic Lich–Gregoir extravesical ureteroneocystostomy has the success rate 90–100%.[14] As compared to open surgery laparoscopic ureteric reimplantation has the advantage of less analgesic requirement, shorter hospital stay, and faster convalescence.[15]

 
   References Top

1.
Gilmour DT, Dwyer PL, Carey MP. Lower urinary tract injury during gynecologic surgery and its detection by intraoperative cystoscopy. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94 (5 Pt 2):883-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Watterson JD, Mahoney JE, Futter NG, Gaffield J. Iatrogenic ureteric injuries: Approaches to etiology and management. Can J Surg 1998;41:379-82.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Roy KK, Neena M, Sunesh K, Seth A, Nayar B. Genitourinary fistula – An experience from tertiary care hospital. JK Sci 2006;8:144-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Frankman EA, Wang L, Bunker CH, Lowder JL. Lower urinary tract injury in women in the United States, 1979-2006. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:495.e1-5.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Lee JS, Choe JH, Lee HS, Seo JT. Urologic complications following obstetric and gynecologic surgery. Korean J Urol 2012;53:795-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Hadley HR. Vesicovaginal fistula. Curr Urol Rep 2002;3:401-7.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Arrowsmith S, Hamlin EC, Wall LL. Obstructed labor injury complex: Obstetric fistula formation and the multifaceted morbidity of maternal birth trauma in the developing world. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1996;51:568-74.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Kumar S, Kekre NS, Gopalakrishnan G. Vesicovaginal fistula: An update. Indian J Urol 2007;23:187-91.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
9.
Tenggardjaja CF, Goldman HB. Advances in minimally invasive repair of vesicovaginal fistulas. Curr Urol Rep 2013;14:253-61.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
O'Conor VJ Jr, Sokol JK, Bulkley GJ, Nanninga JB. Suprapubic closure of vesicovaginal fistula. J Urol 1973;109:51-4.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Eilber KS, Kavaler E, Rodríguez LV, Rosenblum N, Raz S. Ten-year experience with transvaginal vesicovaginal fistula repair using tissue interposition. J Urol 2003;169:1033-6.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Chibber PJ, Shah HN, Jain P. Laparoscopic O'Conor's repair for vesico-vaginal and vesico-uterine fistulae. BJU Int 2005;96:183-6.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Härkki-Sirén P, Sjöberg J, Tiitinen A. Urinary tract injuries after hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:113-8.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Modi P, Gupta R, Rizvi SJ. Laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy and psoas hitch for post-hysterectomy ureterovaginal fistula. J Urol 2008;180:615-7.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Rassweiler JJ, Gözen AS, Erdogru T, Sugiono M, Teber D. Ureteral reimplantation for management of ureteral strictures: A retrospective comparison of laparoscopic and open techniques. Eur Urol 2007;51:512-22.  Back to cited text no. 15
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3042    
    Printed82    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded552    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal