Urology Annals
About UA | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Online submissionLogin 
Urology Annals
  Editorial Board | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact
Users Online: 664   Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 42-45

Evaluating efficacy of various operative procedures done in anterior urethral stricture using urethral stricture score

Department of Surgery, MGM Medical College and MY Group of Hospitals, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India

Correspondence Address:
Lukesh A Patil
Room No. 31, PG Block, MGMMC Boys Hostel, White Church Colony, Indore - 452 001, Madhya Pradesh
Login to access the Email id

DOI: 10.4103/0974-7796.162213

PMID: 26834400

Rights and Permissions

Context: Scoring systems have been an important tool of clinical decision making in medicine. As scoring systems like Glasgow Coma scale have made a revolutionary change in stratifying the patient, in particular, clinical scenario. Wiegand et al. in 2012 proposed UREThRAL Score a novel method to quantify anterior urethral stricture. Aims: The aim was to validate urethral stricture score (USS) for evaluating the efficacy of operative procedures. Settings and Design: Study was done in a retrospective manner and includes patients operated for anterior urethral stricture by a single surgeon in tertiary care center over the period of 2008–2014. Subjects and Methods: A total of 57 cases were included in this study who met the inclusion criteria, of these cases 7 underwent excision and primary anastomosis (EPA), 20 underwent preputial flap urethroplasty (PFUP), 22 underwent tunica albuginea urethroplasty (TAU), and rest 8 underwent scrotal flap urethroplasty (SFUP). Procedures were assigned different complexity level, and USS was compared with the particular procedure to see the relation between both. Statistical Analysis Used: Data were analyzed using ANOVA on SPSS software. Results: Mean USS for EPA, PFUP, TAU, and SFUP in our study group was found to be 6.57, 8.95, 9.00, and 10.00, respectively, with an overall USS of 9.03, with a standard deviation of 1.56. USS was significantly associated with complexity. Conclusions: Mean USS increased with increase in surgical complexity indicating that higher USS correlates with more complex surgery. Strongest association between complexity and the individual parameter was found with location and length.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded314    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal