Urology Annals
About UA | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Online submissionLogin 
Urology Annals
  Editorial Board | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact
Users Online: 1294   Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 403-408

Primary hypospadias repair techniques: A review of the evidence


PARC Urology, Dallas, Texas, USA

Correspondence Address:
Warren Snodgrass
5680 Frisco Square Bldv, Suite 2300, Frisco, Texas 75034
USA
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/0974-7796.192097

PMID: 28057982

Rights and Permissions

This review summarizes data regarding commonly used surgical techniques to repair distal and proximal hypospadias. We review evidence concerning indications for various procedures used in primary hypospadias repair, and their complications, urinary function and esthetic results. Available evidence suggests TIP is preferable to Mathieu for distal hypospadias correction. Current data do not identify a clear preference between TIP and onlay flap for proximal repair when there is ventral curvature <30°, or between various flap and graft options when curvature is >31°. A review of objective data helps clarify decision-making for distal hypospadias repair. Additional objective evidence is needed to identify preferred options for proximal hypospadias repair. Measuring glansplasty dimensions (meatal size and distance from meatus to corona) may improve urinary function assessments, and provide additional objective data for decision-making between various surgical techniques.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3929    
    Printed31    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded823    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal