|Year : 2016 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 449-453
Predictors of systemic inflammatory response syndrome following percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Karunamoorthy Ramaraju, Arun Kumar Paranjothi, Dhinakar Babu Namperumalsamy, Ilamparuthi Chennakrishnan
Department of Urology, Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
|Date of Submission||29-Apr-2016|
|Date of Acceptance||08-Aug-2016|
|Date of Web Publication||12-Oct-2016|
Arun Kumar Paranjothi
Plot No. 29, Emerald Street, Vivekananda Nagar, Kolathur, Chennai - 600 099, Tamil Nadu
| Abstract|| |
Introduction and Objectives: Sepsis remains one of the dreaded complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). To analyze prospectively the preoperative and intraoperative factors that predict the occurrence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) in patients undergoing PCNL so that we can aggressively manage those patients from the preoperative period itself and avert the dangerous complications.
Materials and Methods: A prospective study was carried out between August 2012 and March 2013 including all patients who underwent PCNL. Patients with infected collecting system, synchronous ureteric stones, stents, or percutaneous nephrostomy drainage were excluded from the study. Patients were evaluated with physical examination, urine analysis, urine culture and sensitivity, complete blood count, renal function test, X-ray kidney, ureter, and bladder (KUB), and plain and contrast-enhanced computerized tomography KUB. Patients who developed any two or above of the following in the postoperative period were considered to have developed SIRS. (1) Temperature >100.4°F (38°C) or <96.8°F (36°C). (2) Pulse rate >90/min. (3) Respiratory rate >20/min. (4) White blood cell count >12,000/ml or <4000/ml.
Results: Of the 120 patients who underwent PCNL 29 (24.1%) developed features of SIRS. On univariate analysis, gender, diabetes mellitus, bladder urine culture, and serum creatinine were found to be statistically insignificant. Blood transfusion (P = 0.009), no of access tracts (P = 0.001), pelvic urine culture (P = 0.04), stone culture (P = 0.003), stone size (P = 0.001), age (P = 0.019), and operative time (P = 0.004) were found to be statistically significant. On multivariate regression analysis stone size, no of access tracts, operative time, and stone culture were found to be statistically significant with regard to the occurrence of SIRS.
Conclusion: Patients with above-identified risk factors must be aggressively treated to prevent the occurrence of sepsis postoperatively.
Keywords: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, post PCNL complications, systemic inflammatory response syndrome
|How to cite this article:|
Ramaraju K, Paranjothi AK, Namperumalsamy DB, Chennakrishnan I. Predictors of systemic inflammatory response syndrome following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol Ann 2016;8:449-53
|How to cite this URL:|
Ramaraju K, Paranjothi AK, Namperumalsamy DB, Chennakrishnan I. Predictors of systemic inflammatory response syndrome following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol Ann [serial online] 2016 [cited 2020 Jul 15];8:449-53. Available from: http://www.urologyannals.com/text.asp?2016/8/4/449/192108
| Introduction|| |
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is considered the standard of care in the management of renal calculous disease. In the early days, the procedure had considerable morbidity and at times mortality.
With advances in technology and improved surgical technique, the mortality is very low and morbidity has come down. Sepsis remains one of the dreaded complications of the procedure. We need factors to predict who all are more likely to develop sepsis so that we can aggressively manage those patients from the preoperative period itself and avert the dangerous complications from occurring.
In this endeavor, analysis of both preoperative and intraoperative factors is essential to identify the risk factors since both can play a role in the development of sepsis.,
Aim and objective
To analyze prospectively the preoperative and intraoperative factors that predict the occurrence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) in patients undergoing PCNL for renal calculus disease.
| Materials and Methods|| |
- Period of study
April 2012 to March 2013.
- Study design
- Ethical clearance
The Institutional Ethics Committee of approved the study.
- Inclusion criteria
All patients with renal stone disease who underwent PCNL in our institution.
- Exclusion criteria:
- Patients with infected collecting system
- Patients with synchronous ureteric stones
- Patients with stents or percutaneous nephrostomy drainage.
Method of study
All patients who presented to our department with renal stone disease were evaluated with physical examination, urine analysis, urine culture and sensitivity, complete blood count, renal function test, X-ray KUB, and plain and contrast-enhanced computerized tomography.
All patients were subjected to percutaneous nephrolithotomy after obtaining anesthetic fitness.
All patients were administered 1 g of ceftriaxone and 500 mg of amikacin as a standard antibiotic prophylaxis for a period of 3 days including one preoperative dose. Patients with preoperative serum creatinine <1.4 were not administered amikacin.
All patients underwent PCNL under general anesthesia. Patients were placed in lithotomy position, and a 5 Fr ureteric catheter was introduced. Contrast was used to identify the collecting system and to select the calyx for puncture. After prone positioning with adequate padding, the posterior calyceal puncture was done under fluoroscopic guidance. The level of puncture was decided as per the location of stone to ensure complete clearance.
Puncture was done using 18 G three part needle, and a guidewire was placed within the system. Guide rod was introduced and serial coaxial dilatation of tract was done with co-axial metal dilators. Access sheath was placed. Using 26 Fr nephroscope and pneumatic lithotriptor stone fragmentation was done.
After fragments were evacuated, antegrade 4 Fr ureteric stent is placed. A 20 Fr nephrostomy tube is also placed.
Intraoperative parameters such as operative time, no of access tracts used, and need for blood transfusion were recorded. Pelvic urine collected on puncture and stone were sent for culture and sensitivity.
Patients were followed up in postoperative period with daily complete blood count including white blood cell (WBC) count, serial pulse rate, temperature, and respiratory rate monitoring.
Postprocedure check X-ray KUB was taken before removing the nephrostomy tube in the 1st postoperative day. Ureteric stent was removed after 14 days.
Patients who developed any two or above of the following in the postoperative period were considered to have developed SIRS.
- Temperature >100.4°F (38°C) or <96.8°F (36°C)
- Pulse rate >90/min
- Respiratory rate >20/min
- WBC count >12,000/ml or <4000/ml.
Statistical analysis of the study
For discrete data, proportion is computed, and the mean and standard deviation are computed for the continuous data. The Chi-square test was applied to compare the proportions between the groups. To examine the association between the outcome (SIRS) and several variables, logistic regression analysis was done. All analyses were two-tailed, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Observation and Results|| |
A total of 120 patients underwent PCNL in our institute during the study period. All the patients were evaluated both preoperatively and postoperatively as described above. Of these 120 patients, 29 (24.1%) of them developed features of SIRS in the postoperative period.
The patient characteristics are as shown in [Table 1],[Table 2] and [Figure 1].
Univariate analysis showed a significant association between age of the patient, blood transfusion, stone size, number of access tracts, operative time, pelvic urine culture  showing growth, and stone culture showing growth as predictors of SIRS [Table 3].
|Table 3: Parameters independently associated with systemic inflammatory response syndrome on univariable analysis|
Click here to view
On multivariate regression analysis, stone size, no of access tracts, operative time, and stone culture were found to be statistically significant [Table 4] with regard to the occurrence of SIRS.
| Discussion|| |
Renal stone disease is a common urological problem. Medical management may not be possible in all situations. In certain situations like increasing stone burden or in specific type of stones like infective stones, surgical management is warranted. Moreover, medical management is more useful to prevent recurrences following surgical removal rather than as primary therapy.
Surgical management as described includes both open and endourological procedures. In the modern era of minimally invasive surgery, renal calculous surgery is no exception.
The procedure of PCNL has gained widespread acceptance and is the standard of care to treat renal calculous disease.
The procedure when attempted initially was time-consuming, tedious for both patient and treating surgeon, and with considerable morbidity and some mortality.
With advances in imaging, optics, and improved understanding of the pathology behind the considerable morbidity, the procedure has been standardized.
Initially obtaining an access was considered a vital step in the success of the procedure.
With good preoperative imaging particularly reconstructed computerized tomography, it paved the way for better localization and defining the extent of calculi. Moreover, better delineation of pelvicalyceal anatomy has helped us in obtaining an access to the pelvicalyceal system with ease.
Further understanding of the way of obtaining an access with both fluoroscopic and ultrasonographic guidance has helped us in successfully creating a tract into the pelvicalyceal system.
Even though both antegrade and retrograde techniques of access are available, the most commonly practiced access is through the antegrade access.
Developments in creating a tract sufficient for the procedure have also lend a helping hand in the success of the procedure. Various methods of tract dilatation such as coaxial Alken dilators, Amplatz semi-rigid dilators, and balloon dilators have helped in establishing a successful tract.
Advances in optics and miniaturization of endo instruments have also reduced the morbidity and improved the success rate. Introduction of flexible instruments has also greatly improved access to all the parts of collecting system without a need for additional tracts.
Advances in intracorporeal lithotripters have also improved the success rate of PCNL. Smaller size lithotripter probes and efficient retrieval of stone fragments have improved the outcome of the procedure.
In spite of all the advances and resultant improvements, certain morbidities of the procedure continue to affect the patients. Even though the procedure is being done under standard antibiotic prophylaxis, still patients develop a postoperative fever.,,
The procedure is usually done after sterilizing the urine in patients with preoperative urine culture showing growth. Still 15–30% of patients develop postoperative SIRS of which 1–2% of patients develop sepsis. The likelihood of patients developing sepsis cannot be predicted as of now.
However, the likelihood of developing SIRS in patients undergoing PCNL can be determined by identifying certain preoperative and intraoperative factors associated with the patients.
Our study comprising of 120 patients who underwent PCNL showed that 29 (24.1%) of them developed SIRS postoperatively. A study by Korets et al. showed SIRS incidence of 9.8%. Another study by Chen et al. showed SIRS incidence of 23.4%.
On analysis of data collected before, during, and after surgery, it showed certain factors associated significantly in developing SIRS.
Univariate analysis showed a significant association between age of the patient (>42 years), need for blood transfusion, stone size (>2.893 cm), number of access tracts (1 or >1), operative time (>70 min), pelvic urine culture showing growth, and stone culture  showing growth.
With regard to gender distribution, diabetes mellitus, bladder urine culture showing growth, and raised serum creatinine, the association was found to be statistically insignificant.
On multivariate analysis, only stone size, number of access tracts, operative time, and stone culture were found to be statistically significant in predicting the occurrence of SIRS postoperatively.
| Conclusion|| |
In patients undergoing PCNL, the following factors were found on analysis to be significantly associated with developing SIRS and thereby helping to identify those likely to develop sepsis.
- Univariate analysis showed a significant association between age of the patient, blood transfusion, stone size, number of access tracts, operative time, pelvic urine culture showing growth, and stone culture showing growth as predictors of SIRS
- Multivariate analysis showed stone size, number of access tracts, operative time, and stone culture as statistically significant in predicting the occurrence of SIRS postoperatively
- In this study, no statistically significant association was found between gender, diabetes mellitus, bladder urine culture, and raised serum creatinine in developing SIRS postoperatively.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Chen L, Xu QQ, Li JX, Xiong LL, Wang XF, Huang XB. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: An assessment of risk factors. Int J Urol 2008;15:1025-8.
Mariappan P, Smith G, Bariol SV, Moussa SA, Tolley DA. Stone and pelvic urine culture and sensitivity are better than bladder urine as predictors of urosepsis following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective clinical study. J Urol 2005;173:1610-4.
Korets R, Graversen JA, Kates M, Mues AC, Gupta M. Post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy systemic inflammatory response: A prospective analysis of preoperative urine, renal pelvic urine and stone cultures. J Urol 2011;186:1899-903.
Draga RO, Kok ET, Sorel MR, Bosch RJ, Lock TM. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Factors associated with fever after the first postoperative day and systemic inflammatory response syndrome. J Endourol 2009;23:921-7.
Sharifi Aghdas F, Akhavizadegan H, Aryanpoor A, Inanloo H, Karbakhsh M. Fever after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Contributing factors. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2006;7:367-71.
Gonen M, Turan H, Ozturk B, Ozkardes H. Factors affecting fever following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective clinical study. J Endourol 2008;22:2135-8.
Gabay C, Kushner I. Acute-phase proteins and other systemic responses to inflammation. N Engl J Med 1999;340:448-54.
Margel D, Ehrlich Y, Brown N, Lask D, Livne PM, Lifshitz DA. Clinical implication of routine stone culture in percutaneous nephrolithotomy – A prospective study. Urology 2006;67:26-9.
Wang Y, Jiang F, Wang Y, Hou Y, Zhang H, Chen Q, et al.
Post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy septic shock and severe hemorrhage: A study of risk factors. Urol Int 2012;88:307-10.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]