Urology Annals
About UA | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Online submissionLogin 
Urology Annals
  Editorial Board | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact
Users Online: 531   Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size


 
Table of Contents
CASE REPORT
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 174-176  

Laparoscopic-assisted mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of large calculi in pelvic ectopic kidney


Department of Urology, Pramodini Urology Foundation, Pune, Maharashtra, India

Date of Submission31-Dec-2015
Date of Acceptance08-Apr-2016
Date of Web Publication10-Apr-2017

Correspondence Address:
Ketan P Vartak
Pramodini Urology Foundation, 917/20 A, F.C. Road, Opposite Hotel Vaishali, Pune - 411 004, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/0974-7796.204189

PMID: 28479771

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

We report two cases of male patients with pelvic ectopic kidney with large stones cleared with laparoscopic-assisted minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (Mini-PERC) and holmium laser. These are the first cases of Mini-PERC done for pelvic ectopic kidney reported thus far.

Keywords: Ectopic kidney, laparoscopic minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy, RIRS, pyelolithotomy


How to cite this article:
Vartak KP, Salvi PH. Laparoscopic-assisted mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of large calculi in pelvic ectopic kidney. Urol Ann 2017;9:174-6

How to cite this URL:
Vartak KP, Salvi PH. Laparoscopic-assisted mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of large calculi in pelvic ectopic kidney. Urol Ann [serial online] 2017 [cited 2019 Jul 22];9:174-6. Available from: http://www.urologyannals.com/text.asp?2017/9/2/174/204189


   Introduction Top


Although the treatment modalities for stones in anatomically normal kidneys are well established, there are no clear guidelines for ectopic or malrotated kidneys as the anatomy is variable and hence decisions have to be taken on a case by case basis. This depends on the size and location of stones, location and anatomy of the renal unit, and age and anatomical problems in the patient.

The incidence of pelvic ectopic kidneys is 1 in 2200 to 1 in 3000.[1] The various modalities that can be offered to the stones in pelvic ectopic kidneys are extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), open surgery, laparoscopic pyelolithotomy, retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), or laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

Although the ESWL is a good modality, it has a success rate of 54%[1] due to hindrance of bowel gas and poor clearance due to anatomical constraints. Open surgery is a good modality for renal pelvic stones but is difficult for intrarenal or calyceal stones due to limited exposures of pelvi-calyceal system (PCS) in ectopic kidneys. Further, there is a lot of morbidities as compared to other modalities. RIRS is a good modality for stones less than 1.5 Cm. in size; however as the stone size increases, the difficulty of surgery & the stone clearance rate worsens. However, it is the best option if we consider the morbidity or postoperative pain and recovery.

These are the first documented cases.


   Case Report Top


A 60-year-old male patient presented with complaints of pain in abdomen for 15 days, sudden onset, spasmodic type of pain, localized to umbilical and left iliac fossa, radiating to back. The patient gave history of two to three episodes of vomiting.

Clinical examination did not reveal any abnormality.

Radiological investigations

Ultrasonography (USG) of the abdomen and pelvis was suggestive of left kidney not visualized in left renal fossa, seen in the pelvis suggestive of the left pelvic kidney. Calculus (20 mm) seen in the left renal pelvis caused moderate left hydronephrosis. A few (3–4) small (3–6 mm) size calyceal calculi were also seen. Right kidney normal size and echotexture. The rest was normal.

Xray KUB and IVU was done which shows Left pelvic ectopic kidney with stones and normal right kidney [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Kidney, ureter, bladder X-ray and intravenous pyelogram

Click here to view


Management

Based on history, clinical examination, and radiological investigations, it was diagnosed with left pelvic kidney with 20 mm calculus at renal pelvis. Hence, the decision for laparoscopic minimally invasive PCNL (Mini-PERC) was taken.

Laparoscopy was performed in a supine position through two ports, namely, umbilical (10 mm) and left iliac fossa (5 mm). Bowel loops were mobilized and hydronephrotic left kidney visualized in the left pelvic region. Initial puncture was done from left iliac fossa under C-arm control. Dilatation was done till 16 French (Fr) using the Mini PCNL dilator, and Mini PCNL sheath was introduced. The Mini PCNL scope was inserted and calculi were seen. Approximately 2 cm brown calculi were fragmented using holmium laser. Fragmented calculi pieces were removed using 4 Fr forceps. A 16 cm 4 Fr double J (DJ) stent was placed antegradely and confirmed on the C-arm. Infant feeding tube No. 10 was kept as a nephrostomy. As the puncture in ectopic kidney was done through the upper calyx, it was easy to enter the mid and lower pole to clear all the stones. Pelvic drain was kept through the right port (14 Fr Ryle's tube) to drain peri-nephrostomy urinary leak into the peritoneum. After 48 h, nephrostomy tube was removed. Pelvic drain was removed after nephrostomy drain to check the nephrostomy site leak. The patient got discharged on postoperative day 5. Postoperative X-ray of KUB was done which showed no evidence of residual calculi.

Another patient was a 48-year-old man presenting with left flank pain. His USG suggested gross left hydronephrosis due to 19.2 mm and 14.7 mm calculi at pelvi-ureteric junction (PUJ) with papery thin parenchyma with ectopic right kidney with 20.2 mm stone at PUJ.

His clinical examination revealed palpable, tender left kidney. The rest was normal. His creatinine was 1.7 mg/dL and rest of the laboratory investigations was normal.

Computed tomography urography was performed. It showed a grossly enlarged, hydronephrotic left kidney with a dumbbell-shaped stone at PUJ and right pelvic ectopic kidney with 18 mm × 21 mm × 12 mm stone with 1075 HU with renal pelvis facing anteromedially [Figure 2].
Figure 2: Computed tomography scan

Click here to view


He was treated with PCNL on the left side with placement of an integrated DJ stent. After 2 days, his creatinine dropped to 1.3 mg/dL. He was posted for laparoscopic-assisted Mini-PERC on the 4th postoperative day after left PCNL.

As the stone size in both cases was exceeding 20 mm, retrograde intrarenal surgery was not preferred. Furthermore, the clearance of residual stones and gravel is poor in malrotated ectopic kidney. The morbidity of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and the risk of urinary leak would have been higher. Hence, Mini PCNL was preferred.


   Discussion Top


There are very few case reports of an ectopic kidney with calculi. Regular PCNL was contradicted as there is a chance to damage to bowel loops.

Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy is a good option for renal pelvic large stones.[2] It might have limitations in calyceal or infundibular stones. Because of the location and configuration of renal PCS of ectopic kidneys can vary, each case requires a unique approach for surgical management of stones. In the situation of an ectopic kidney with laterally or anteriorly directed pelvis, a skilled laparoscopic surgeon can perform a good laparoscopic pyelolithotomy.[3] However, it is difficult in ectopic kidneys without that kind of anatomy. In addition, a small incision is required to deliver the stone, adding to the morbidity. Laparoscopy-assisted PCNL is an established procedure with all the advantages of PCNL. There are reports of micro Mini-PERC done without the assistance of laparoscopy,[4] but there is a risk of puncturing bowel and adjacent structures. Hence, laparoscopic assistance is safer. The risk of bleeding and parenchymal injury is more in PCNL as compared to Mini PCNL.[5] Due to the smaller size of Mini PCNL, it is easier to enter into different calyces and thereby improves stone clearance; hence, laparoscopic-assisted Mini PCNL should be a preferred modality.

RIRS has its own limitations in clearing larger than 1.5 cm stones and a total clearance of residual stones. The risk of sepsis is also much higher as compared to percutaneous procedures.[6],[7] The chances of requiring a multistage approach are also higher in RIRS. It is difficult to clear large stones (>1.5 cm), is more time-consuming, and may require the second procedure and the stone-free rate are inferior to PCNL techniques. It is more so in ectopically located kidneys which have problems with clearing the residual fragments due to high insertion of ureter and abnormal pyeloureteral motility. Furthermore, insertion of flexible ureteroscope is difficult due to abnormal and tortuous course of ureters in pelvic kidneys.[8] Overall, the stone-free rates of PCNL (94%) techniques are better than RIRS (75%) in stones larger than 2 cm.[9]


   Conclusion Top


Laparoscopic-assisted Mini PCNL is a safe modality to clear large stones in pelvic ectopic kidney with good stone clearance.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Mehmet RM, Rustu YF, Hanefi B, Mursel D, Fusun A, Mehmet I. Direct pelvic access percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of ectopic kidney stone: A case report and literature review. Ren Fail 2013;35:1440-4.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Troxel SA, Low RK, Das S. Extraperitoneal laparoscopy-assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy in a left pelvic kidney. J Endourol 2002;16:655-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Gupta NP, Yadav R, Singh A. Laparoscopic transmesocolic pyelolithotomy in an ectopic pelvic kidney. JSLS 2007;11:258-60.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Ganesamoni R, Sabnis RB, Mishra S, Desai MR. Microperc for the management of renal calculi in pelvic ectopic kidneys. Indian J Urol 2013;29:257-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
5.
Jackman SV, Docimo SG, Cadeddu JA, Bishoff JT, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW. The “Mini-PERC” technique: A less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 1998;16:371-4.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Zhang W, Zhou T, Wu T, Gao X, Peng Y, Xu C, et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole renal stones: A meta-analysis and systematic review. J Endourol 2015;29:745-59.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Rehman J, Monga M, Landman J, Lee DI, Felfela T, Conradie MC, et al. Characterization of intrapelvic pressure during ureteropyeloscopy with ureteral access sheaths. Urology 2003;61:713-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Cinman NM, Okeke Z, Smith AD. Pelvic kidney: Associated diseases and treatment. J Endourol 2007;21:836-42.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Bryniarski P, Paradysz A, Zyczkowski M, Kupilas A, Nowakowski K, Bogacki R. A randomized controlled study to analyze the safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in the management of renal stones more than 2 cm in diameter. J Endourol 2012;26:52-7.  Back to cited text no. 9
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Report
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1155    
    Printed13    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded147    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal