Urology Annals
About UA | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Online submissionLogin 
Urology Annals
  Editorial Board | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact
Users Online: 229   Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size


 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 230-233  

Predictive factors for fever and sepsis following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A review of 580 patients


Department of Urology, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College and General Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Date of Submission06-Dec-2016
Date of Acceptance20-Mar-2017
Date of Web Publication10-Jul-2017

Correspondence Address:
Sumit Suresh Bansal
Department of Urology, College Building, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College and General Hospital, Sion, Mumbai, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/UA.UA_166_16

PMID: 28794587

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Aims: There has been much speculation and discussion about the infective complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). While fever is common after PCNL, the incidence of it progressing to urosepsis is fortunately less. Which patient undergoing PCNL is at risk of developing urosepsis and in whom aggressive treatment of fever postoperatively may prevent the progression to severe sepsis becomes a very important question. This study aims to answer these vital questions.
Settings and Design: This is a single institutional, retrospective study over a period of 3 years.
Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of medical records of the patients undergoing PCNL from August 2012 to July 2015 was done. A total of 580 patients were included in the study, and the study variables recorded were analyzed statistically.
Statistical Analysis Used: Statistical analysis was performed by Chi-square test.
Results: Three factors significantly correlated with postoperative severe sepsis, namely, stone size >25 mm, prolonged operative time >120 min, and significant bleeding requiring transfusion. Factors associated with fever after PCNL which did not progress to sepsis were the presence of staghorn calculi and multiple access tracts in addition to the factors listed above for sepsis.
Conclusions: Fever after PCNL is not uncommon but it has a low incidence of progressing to life-threatening severe sepsis and multiorgan dysfunction syndrome. Special precautions and monitoring should be taken in patients with bigger stone (>25 mm) and patients with severe intraoperative hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion. It is better to stage the procedure rather than prolong the operative time (120 min). Identifying these factors and minimizing them may decrease the incidence of this life-threatening complication.

Keywords: Fever, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, sepsis, systemic inflammatory response syndrome


How to cite this article:
Bansal SS, Pawar PW, Sawant AS, Tamhankar AS, Patil SR, Kasat GV. Predictive factors for fever and sepsis following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A review of 580 patients. Urol Ann 2017;9:230-3

How to cite this URL:
Bansal SS, Pawar PW, Sawant AS, Tamhankar AS, Patil SR, Kasat GV. Predictive factors for fever and sepsis following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A review of 580 patients. Urol Ann [serial online] 2017 [cited 2020 Aug 10];9:230-3. Available from: http://www.urologyannals.com/text.asp?2017/9/3/230/210034


   Introduction Top


Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is presently the mainstay of treatment for most large renal calculi. Since its inception in 1976,[1] PCNL has stood the test of time. It is, however, not free of complications. The most common complications of PCNL are a fever of no clinical significance and bleeding not requiring transfusion. Urosepsis is infrequent but a dreaded complication with an incidence ranging from 0.25% to 4.7% in various series.[2],[3] Urosepsis can progress to multiorgan dysfunction syndrome (MODS), which has a high mortality. Therefore, predicting and preventing factors leading to urosepsis become of utmost importance.

Conventionally, infected urine and stone were implicated as possible causes of urosepsis,[4] with recent articles stressing other factors also to be important for the same.

Which patient undergoing PCNL is at risk of developing urosepsis and in whom aggressive treatment of fever postoperatively may prevent the progression to severe sepsis becomes a very important question. This single institutional retrospective review of 580 patients over a period of 3 years aims to answer these vital questions.


   Materials and Methods Top


Retrospective analysis of medical records of all the patients undergoing PCNL from August 2012 to July 2015 was done. A total of 580 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria for this study. Exclusion criteria were compromised renal function, untreated urinary tract infection, intraoperative purulent urine, fever before surgery, multiple stones more than 5, and residual stone more than 4 mm.

The recorded data included age, gender, stone size, stone location, medical comorbidity, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, subcostal or intercostal tract, number of access tracts used, operative time, blood transfusion, pre- and post-operative hemoglobin, pre- and post-operative total leukocyte count, postoperative maximum and minimum body temperature, postoperative maximum heart rate (HR), and postoperative maximum respiratory rate (RR). Patients with positive urine culture were treated adequately with antimicrobials. The intravenous antibiotic cover was given at induction of anesthesia depending on previous urine culture report or injection cefotaxime if urine was sterile.

The diagnosis was made on either intravenous urography or computed tomography (CT) urography. Stone size was calculated as the maximum diameter on plain X-ray kidney, ureter, and bladder (KUB) or CT KUB plain for radiolucent stones. For multiple stones, diameters of all stones were taken separately and added. Staghorn calculi were defined as stones occupying the pelvis and two or more calyces.

The standard PCNL procedure was used for all the patients. Under anesthesia, ureteric catheter was kept and fixed to Foley catheter. The patient was turned prone. The initial puncture was taken with an 18-gauge needle and tract dilated with Alkens dilators. A 24 or 26 Fr Amplatz sheath was placed. A 22 Fr rigid nephroscope was used. The operative time was calculated from turning patient prone till placement of nephrostomy tube. Patients were divided into four categories depending on the operative time: <60 min, 60–90 min, 90–120 min, and >120 min.

Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) or sepsis was defined as having two or more of the following:[5]

  • Body temperature <36°C odds ratio (OR) >38°C
  • HR >90 beats/min
  • RR >20 breaths/min or PaCO2 <32 mmHg
  • White blood cell >12,000/dl <4,000/dl, or >10% immature (band) forms.


Severe sepsis was termed in case of systolic blood pressure (BP) <90 mmHg OR systolic BP drop >40 mmHg.

Statistical analysis was done with Chi-square test, and P< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


   Results Top


[Table 1] depicts the demographic data and the relevant preoperative parameters of the patients. This study included 580 patients comprising 343 (59.10%) males and 237 (40.90%) females. The age of patients ranged from 7 to 71 years (mean - 43.3 years). Eighty-four (14.4%) patients were diabetic. Totally, 330 (56.8%) patients had a stone size more than 25 mm, and 175 (30.17%) patients had a staghorn stone. Seventy-two (12.4%) were ASA 3 or 4. One hundred and forty (24.1%) patients had a positive urine culture preoperatively.
Table 1: Preoperative data of patients

Click here to view


[Table 2] depicts the relevant intraoperative factors of the patients. The operative time taken was from 30 to 150 min (mean - 90 min). In 209 (36%) patients, an operative time of more than 120 min was taken. Multiple access tracts were used in 241 (41.55%) patients while 111 (19.1%) patients required a supracostal tract. Blood transfusion was required in 18 (3.1%) patients.
Table 2: Perioperative data of patients

Click here to view


Statistical analysis was done using Chi-square test, and P> 0.05 was considered statistically significant. [Table 3] shows the factors studied in context to fever and sepsis. We found three factors to be significantly correlated with postoperative severe sepsis, namely, stone size >25 mm, prolonged operative time >120 min, and significant bleeding requiring transfusion. Factors associated with fever after PCNL which did not progress to sepsis were the presence of staghorn calculi and multiple access tracts in addition to the factors listed above for sepsis.
Table 3: Incidence of fever and systemic inflammatory response syndrome in different risk factor groups

Click here to view


A total of eight patients went into severe sepsis; however, fortunately, all responded to fluid resuscitation and antibiotics. There was no mortality.

[Figure 1] and [Figure 2] depict the relation of fever and severe sepsis, respectively, with different factors studied.
Figure 1: Bar diagram showing incidence of fever in different risk factor groups

Click here to view
Figure 2: Bar diagram showing incidence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome in different risk factor groups

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


PCNL is a relatively safe procedure for treating upper tract calculi. However, the procedure has to be done with utmost care and only by trained urologists. The pathophysiology of fever and sepsis is multifactorial including proinflammatory cytokines,[6] ischemia-reperfusion injury, and response to blunt trauma to the kidney.[7] There is an increasing interest in the role of noninfectious factors leading to SIRS and severe sepsis. In a study of 209 patients undergoing PCNL by Chen et al.,[8] the incidence of SIRS was reported as 23.4%. Contributory factors were number of tracts, blood transfusion, stone size, and presence of pyelocaliectasis. Similarly, Gonzalez-Ramirez et al. in a study of 280 patients found the incidence of severe sepsis to be 2.14%.[9] Significant bleeding during the procedure was the only factor implicated in severe sepsis while staghorn stones, body mass index <18.5, bleeding, and prolonged surgical time were associated with fever.

Intraoperative bleeding hampers vision prolonging operative time, and increased operative time is a risk factor for bleeding, making it a vicious cycle. Shear and blunt injury to kidney parenchyma releases cytokines and inflammatory mediators which may play a role in causing fever and sepsis. It is clear that prolonged operative time is a risk factor for postoperative fever and severe sepsis, but there are no clear, definite guidelines regarding the same. Wang et al.[10] found 90 min to be the upper limit of safety in their study of 303 patients. However, in this study, we found that the procedure can be safely carried on up to 120 min, starting from turning the patient prone.

Bigger stones including staghorn stones increase the operative time and propensity of bleeding. There is a greater manipulation during the procedure. We found that a stone size of more than 25 mm was associated with both fever and severe sepsis; however, staghorn stone had a positive association with fever but not severe sepsis. A negative preoperative urine culture is desirable but not always possible, especially with a stent or nephrostomy tube in situ. In a prospective trial by Mariappan et al.,[11] where 1 week of prophylactic preoperative ciprofloxacin was compared to control, they found a three-fold decreased risk of infection in the treatment arm.

Multiple access tracts lead to greater manipulation along with more traumas to the kidney with the release of inflammatory cytokines. There is also an added risk of bleeding. Sharma et al.[12] concluded a higher rate of blood transfusion in patients where multiple access tracts were used.


   Conclusions Top


Fever after PCNL is not uncommon but it has a low incidence of progressing to life-threatening severe sepsis and MODS. Special precautions and monitoring should be taken in patients with bigger stone (>25 mm) and patients with intraoperative hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion. It is better to stage the procedure rather than prolong the operative time (120 min). Identifying these factors and minimizing them may decrease the incidence of this life-threatening complication.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Fernström I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1976;10:257-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Egğilmez T, Gören MR. Fever and systemic inflammatory response syndrome seen after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Review of 1290 adult patients. J Clin Anal Med 2015;6:196-201.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ. Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy 2007;51:899-906.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Mariappan P, Smith G, Bariol SV, Moussa SA, Tolley DA. Stone and pelvic urine culture and sensitivity are better than bladder urine as predictors of urosepsis following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective clinical study. J Urol 2005;173:1610-4.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, Dellinger RP, Fein AM, Knaus WA, et al. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest 1992;101:1644-55.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Ward PA. Immunosuppression in sepsis. JAMA 2011;306:2618-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Erridge C. Endogenous ligands of TLR2 and TLR4: Agonists or assistants? J Leukoc Biol 2010;87:989-99.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Chen L, Xu QQ, Li JX, Xiong LL, Wang XF, Huang XB. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: An assessment of risk factors. Int J Urol 2008;15:1025-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Gonzalez-Ramirez A, Camarena L, Gutierrez-Aceves J. 1544 risk factors for fever and sepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 2013;189:633.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Wang Y, Jiang F, Wang Y, Hou Y, Zhang H, Chen Q, et al. Post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy septic shock and severe hemorrhage: A study of risk factors. Urol Int 2012;88:307-10.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Mariappan P, Smith G, Moussa SA, Tolley DA. One week of ciprofloxacin before percutaneous nephrolithotomy significantly reduces upper tract infection and urosepsis: A prospective controlled study. BJU Int 2006;98:1075-9.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Sharma L, Ahmed N, Sengottayan VK. The influence of access on the efficacy and complications in PCNL for renal calculi. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 2016;15:18-25.  Back to cited text no. 12
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusions
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2786    
    Printed28    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded475    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal