Urology Annals
About UA | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Online submissionLogin 
Urology Annals
  Editorial Board | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact
Users Online: 664   Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 330-334

Pathological nature of renal tumors - does size matter?

1 Department of Radiology, Clinical Imaging Insitute, Al Ain Hospital, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, UAE
2 Department of Radiology, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
3 Department of Interventional Radiology, St. Paul's Hospital, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
4 Department of Radiology, PRP Diagnsotic Imaging Limited Bathurst, 2795 New South Wales, Australia
5 Department of Academic Urology, Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK
6 Department of Medical Statistics, Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK
7 Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK

Correspondence Address:
Lutfi Ali S Kurban
Clinical Imaging Institute, Al Ain Hospital, PO Box: 64624, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi
Login to access the Email id

DOI: 10.4103/UA.UA_17_17

PMID: 29118533

Rights and Permissions

Introduction: We examined the relationship between the size and nature of renal masses in term of malignant potential, histological grading, pathological staging and presence of necrosis and sarcomatoid changes. Materials and Methods: Retrospectively, we reviewed 323 consecutive nephrectomies between 2000 and 2010. Final pathology was correlated with tumour size. The renal tumours were stratified into three groups according to the largest diameter, defined as 4 cm or smaller, greater than 4 cm to 7 cm, and greater than 7 cm. We recorded the proportion of benign tumours, tumour grade and stage, presence of necrosis and sarcomatoid change. Results: Small renal masses ≤4 cm (SRMs) were more likely to be localised to the kidney (90%) and of lower histological grade (75%). The proportion of benign tumours in SRMs (15%) was higher than other two groups with the majority of benign tumours being oncocytomas. There was a statistically significant trend with greater necrosis and sarcomatoid change for the large size group. Conclusions: SRMs are likely to be low grade and organ confined with little or no adverse pathological features. There is increased likelihood of benignity in SRTs with the majority of benign tumours being oncocytomas.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded187    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal