|Year : 2020 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 172-175
Metastatic prostate cancer to an ischiorectal fossa lymph node identified on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging
Andrew M Fang1, Samuel J Galgano2, Jennifer B Gordetsky3, Sunil Sudarshan1, Andrew M McDonald4, Soroush Rais-Bahrami5
1 Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
2 Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
3 Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
4 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
5 Department of Urology; Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
|Date of Submission||22-Feb-2019|
|Date of Acceptance||09-Oct-2019|
|Date of Web Publication||14-Apr-2020|
Dr. Soroush Rais-Bahrami
Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Faculty Office Tower 1107, 510 20th Street South, Birmingham, Alabama 35294
| Abstract|| |
Prostate cancer is the most common noncutaneous malignancy in American men. Its lymphatic drainage is very well established throughout literature. We report the case of a 72-year-old Caucasian male with elevated serum prostate-specific antigen and biopsy-confirmed high-risk prostate cancer who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for staging and treatment planning. The imaging revealed suspicious lymph nodes in the left ischiorectal and right obturator fossae that were biopsy confirmed as metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma. Herein, we present the divergence from the well-established lymphatic drainage of prostate cancer and the role of MRI in detecting this prostate cancer site of spread.
Keywords: Cancer staging, ischiorectal fossa, lymphatic spread, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, prostate cancer
|How to cite this article:|
Fang AM, Galgano SJ, Gordetsky JB, Sudarshan S, McDonald AM, Rais-Bahrami S. Metastatic prostate cancer to an ischiorectal fossa lymph node identified on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Urol Ann 2020;12:172-5
|How to cite this URL:|
Fang AM, Galgano SJ, Gordetsky JB, Sudarshan S, McDonald AM, Rais-Bahrami S. Metastatic prostate cancer to an ischiorectal fossa lymph node identified on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Urol Ann [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Jul 14];12:172-5. Available from: http://www.urologyannals.com/text.asp?2020/12/2/172/282396
| Introduction|| |
The metastatic spread of prostate cancer to lymph nodes is universally considered one of the most adverse prognostic indicators in patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer and is responsible for upstaging of disease. Therefore, the lymphatic drainage and patterns of spread for prostate cancer have been widely described in literature, as the disease generally disseminates to the regional pelvic lymph nodes first. This initial template of potential spread includes pelvic lymph nodes in the obturator fossa, along the external and internal iliac vessels, and in the space anterior to the sacrum. From these typical initial landing sites, prostate cancer can further spread along the lymph nodes around the common iliac vessels cranially to the retroperitoneal nodal regions including the para-aortic, paracaval, and interaortocaval lymph nodes.,
Pelvic imaging has been widely used for clinical staging in patients diagnosed with high-volume, intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer, or those who harbor a higher probability of nodal involvement. Over the last few years, advances in multiparametric-magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) have made this imaging modality a critical tool in clinical staging for these patients along with planning treatment decisions. mp-MRI has not only allowed for the identification of suspicious lesions in the prostate but has also demonstrated an equivalent ability to accurately stage pelvic lymph nodes as compared to computed tomography (CT).,, Herein, we present a case of prostate cancer with metastatic spread to lymph nodes identified by mp-MRI including a biopsy-proven lymph node outside the established lymphatic drainage pattern. To date, the identification of a prostate cancer-positive lymph node in the ischiorectal fossa by mp-MRI has not been reported.
| Case Report|| |
A 72-year-old Caucasian male with a history of prostatitis presented for the evaluation of his recently elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Over the past 10 years, his PSA values have ranged from 1 to 3 ng/ml. However, his last two annual PSA screening levels had risen from 3.72 to 8.17 ng/ml. PSA value on the day of presentation was found to have again risen to 10.89 ng/ml. He endorsed that he has a history of mild intermittent left groin and left scrotal pain for over a year. On digital rectal examination, his prostate was estimated at 60 g, without any nodularity or asymmetry.
For his persistently rising PSA values, he subsequently underwent transrectal ultrasound biopsy of his prostate. After the biopsy, he developed pelvic pain, tenesmus, and hematuria that were successfully managed with oral antibiotics. The biopsy pathology revealed prostate cancer in 3 out of 12 cores. Two cores showed small foci of prostatic adenocarcinoma, with Gleason score 3+3 = 6 (Grade Group 1) [Figure 1]a and [Figure 1]b. One core had Gleason score 4+4 = 8 (Grade Group 4) prostatic adenocarcinoma with cribriform morphology involving <1% of one core [Figure 1]c and [Figure 1]d. For staging and treatment planning, he underwent mp-MRI of the prostate.
|Figure 1: (a) H and E-stained slide showing prostatic adenocarcinoma, Gleason score 3+3 = 6; (b) H and E-stained slide at high magnification showing cancerous glands with amphophilic cytoplasm, straight luminal borders, dense secretions, and prominent nucleoli; (c) A small focus of high-grade prostatic adenocarcinoma, Gleason score 4+4 = 8, with cribriform pattern; (d) PIN4 immunohistochemical stain demonstrated loss of basal cells and p504S positivity|
Click here to view
MRI of his prostate revealed two intraprostatic lesions assigned Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 score of 4. In addition, there were two areas of suspected malignant lymphadenopathy. The first was an enlarged 1.8-cm right obturator fossa with restricted diffusion and hypervascularity on dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging [Figure 2]. The second was an enlarged 1.6-cm lymph node in the left ischiorectal fossa with hypointensity on T2-weighted imaging, hypervascularity on dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging, and very low apparent diffusion coefficient with correlative high intensity on b-2000 diffusion-weighted imaging [Figure 3].
|Figure 2: Multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging demonstrating an enlarged right obturator lymph node (a – axial T2) with associated intense restricted diffusion on b2000 diffusion-weighted imaging (b), increased perfusion on dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion map (c), and restricted apparent diffusion coefficient (d)|
Click here to view
|Figure 3: Multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging demonstrating an enlarged left ischiorectal fossa lymph node (a – axial T2) with associated intense restricted diffusion on b2000 diffusion-weighted imaging (b), increased perfusion on dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion map (c), and restricted apparent diffusion coefficient (d)|
Click here to view
After discussion with the patient, he elected to partake in a clinical trial that required him to undergo an additional MRI of his pelvis. The imaging again noted similar lesions as the previous MRI, but also an enlarged 0.7-cm right common iliac node. Due to concern that his lymphadenopathy could be the result of a metastatic process, a colonoscopy and a CT-guided biopsy of his ischiorectal fossa lymph node were obtained [Figure 4]. While the colonoscopy did not demonstrate any signs of malignancy, the CT-guided biopsy results revealed metastatic prostatic adenocarcinoma [Figure 5]. Consequently, the patient was referred to radiation oncology for consideration of radiotherapy and concurrent androgen deprivation therapy for regionally advanced, oligometastatic prostate cancer.
|Figure 4: Computed tomography-guided localization of the left ischiorectal fossa lymph node (a) and subsequent computed tomography-guided transgluteal biopsy of the lymph node (b)|
Click here to view
|Figure 5: (a) H and E-stained slides showing metastatic prostatic adenocarcinoma with cribriform morphology, (b) Adjacent fat can be seen next to the invasive tumor|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
Properly ascertaining the chance of lymph node metastasis and detection of occult lymph node metastases is crucial for treatment planning for patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. The gold standard of nodal staging is pelvic lymph node dissection; however, the procedure is invasive and associated with increased risk of morbidity and complications. Cross-sectional imaging is widely utilized as a noninvasive measure to determine nodal staging in patients with intermediate-to-high-risk prostate cancer. However, it relies largely on the dimensional and morphological characteristics of the lymph nodes to determine the probability of metastatic involvement. A meta-analysis demonstrated that both CT and MRI as anatomic imaging modalities had similar sensitivities of 42% and 39%, respectively, and specificities of 82% and 82%, respectively.
While CT and MRI lack the ideal sensitivities for screening for lymph node metastasis, mp-MRI has shown promise in better predicting nodal metastasis incorporating functional imaging parameters including diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast enhancement. Brembilla et al. examined 101 patients who underwent both preoperative mp-MRI and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Morphologic characteristics of lymph nodes continued to demonstrate low sensitivity in their cohort; however, mp-MRI determinations of tumor volume and stage were more accurate predictors of nodal invasion (area under curve = 0.93 and 0.84, respectively).
While the common routes of lymphatic spread of prostate cancer have been well established, the spread of prostate cancer to the lymph nodes around the rectum and in the ischiorectal region is not considered a routine venue of lymphatic spread for prostate cancer. Nevertheless, there have been a few documented cases of prostate cancer found in perirectal tissues after low anterior resection or abdominoperineal resections for rectal cancer. However, the exact location of these lymph nodes along the mesorectum has not been reported.,,,,, Although it has been postulated that there may be lymphatic drainage connection from the pararectal regions to the internal and external iliac regions, no definitive studies have provided any evidence of this lymphatic drainage pathway.
To date, there have been no reports in the literature of metastatic spread of prostate cancer to lymph nodes below the dentate line and into the ischiorectal fossa. As this lymphatic spread is outside the established primary landing zones of prostate cancer and outside the template for extended pelvic lymph node dissection, the prevalence of metastatic spread of prostate cancer in this region would likely be underestimated. With the advent of mp-MRI for staging and treatment planning of prostate cancer, further investigation with large patient series would be needed to fully determine the prevalence and management of metastatic prostate cancer into the perirectal and ischiorectal fossa lymph nodes.
| Conclusion|| |
The evidence for the use of mp-MRI for treatment planning and clinical staging of prostate cancer has been rising. Our findings demonstrate a case of mp-MRI to identify metastatic lymph nodes including one outside the normal drainage pattern for prostate cancer and boundaries of the extended pelvic lymph node dissection.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
Soroush Rais-Bahrami serves as a consultant for Philips/InVivo Corp, Blue Earth Diagnostics, and Genomic Health Inc.
| References|| |
Gervasi LA, Mata J, Easley JD, Wilbanks JH, Seale-Hawkins C, Carlton CE Jr, et al.
Prognostic significance of lymph nodal metastases in prostate cancer. J Urol 1989;142:332-6.
Briganti A, Suardi N, Capogrosso P, Passoni N, Freschi M, di Trapani E, et al.
Lymphatic spread of nodal metastases in high-risk prostate cancer: The ascending pathway from the pelvis to the retroperitoneum. Prostate 2012;72:186-92.
Heck MM, Souvatzoglou M, Retz M, Nawroth R, Kübler H, Maurer T, et al.
Prospective comparison of computed tomography, diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and [11C] choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography for preoperative lymph node staging in prostate cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2014;41:694-701.
Pasoglou V, Larbi A, Collette L, Annet L, Jamar F, Machiels JP, et al.
One-step TNM staging of high-risk prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): Toward an upfront simplified “all-in-one” imaging approach? Prostate 2014;74:469-77.
Brembilla G, Dell'Oglio P, Stabile A, Ambrosi A, Cristel G, Brunetti L, et al.
Preoperative multiparametric MRI of the prostate for the prediction of lymph node metastases in prostate cancer patients treated with extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Eur Radiol 2018;28:1969-76.
Ploussard G, Briganti A, de la Taille A, Haese A, Heidenreich A, Menon M, et al.
Pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Efficacy, limitations, and complications-a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 2014;65:7-16.
Zarzour JG, Galgano S, McConathy J, Thomas JV, Rais-Bahrami S. Lymph node imaging in initial staging of prostate cancer: An overview and update. World J Radiol 2017;9:389-99.
Mattei A, Fuechsel FG, Bhatta Dhar N, Warncke SH, Thalmann GN, Krause T, et al.
The template of the primary lymphatic landing sites of the prostate should be revisited: Results of a multimodality mapping study. Eur Urol 2008;53:118-25.
Arenal JJ, Torres A, Tinoco C, Citores MA, Benito C, Madriga B,et al
. Metastasization of mesorectal lymph node by a prostate adenocarcinoma. Hum Pathol 2015;2:42-4.
Murray SK, Breau RH, Guha AK, Gupta R. Spread of prostate carcinoma to the perirectal lymph node basin: Analysis of 112 rectal resections over a 10-year span for primary rectal adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2004;28:1154-62.
Mourra N, Parc Y, McNamara D, Tiret E, Flejou JF, Parc R. Lymph node metastases of prostatic adenocarcinoma in the mesorectum in patients with adenocarcinoma or villous tumor of the rectum with collision phenomenon in a single lymph node: Report of five cases. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:384-9.
Park IJ, Kim HC, Yu CS, Kim CS, Kim JS, Kim JC. Lymph node metastases of prostatic adenocarcinoma in the mesorectum in patients with rectal cancer. Cancer Res Treat 2005;37:129-32.
Wade ZK, Shippey JE, Hamon GA, Smoak RL, Argani P, Allsbrook WC Jr. Collision metastasis of prostatic and colonic adenocarcinoma: Report of 2 cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2004;128:318-20.
Miyauchi J, Asahara F, Matsui J. Collision lymph node metastasis of rectal and prostate adenocarcinomas. Pathol Int 2013;63:425-7.
Hövels AM, Heesakkers RA, Adang EM, Jager GJ, Strum S, Hoogeveen YL, et al.
The diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI in the staging of pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer: A meta-analysis. Clin Radiol 2008;63:387-95.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]