Urology Annals
About UA | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Online submissionLogin 
Urology Annals
  Editorial Board | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact
Users Online: 579   Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size


 
Table of Contents
CASE REPORT
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 193-195  

Renal sinus angiomyolipoma: A rare case


Department of Urology, SMS Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

Date of Submission27-Sep-2019
Date of Acceptance10-Jan-2020
Date of Web Publication14-Apr-2020

Correspondence Address:
Prof. Nachiket Vyas
Department of Urology, SMS Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan
India
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/UA.UA_134_19

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Angiomyolipoma (AML) consists of <10% of all renal tumors and is the most common benign mesenchymal neoplasm of the kidney. It arises from the renal cortex and extends toward perirenal fat. Fat-poor AML as well as those arising from rare locations may pose diagnostic difficulties. In our case, we report a rare presentation of this tumor arising from the renal sinus extending toward the pelvis thereby leading to an alternative diagnosis of transitional cell carcinoma of renal pelvis.

Keywords: Angiomyolipoma, rare, renal sinus


How to cite this article:
Gupta A, Priyadarshi S, Vyas N. Renal sinus angiomyolipoma: A rare case. Urol Ann 2020;12:193-5

How to cite this URL:
Gupta A, Priyadarshi S, Vyas N. Renal sinus angiomyolipoma: A rare case. Urol Ann [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Jun 2];12:193-5. Available from: http://www.urologyannals.com/text.asp?2020/12/2/193/282390




   Introduction Top


Angiomyolipoma (AML) is the most common benign mesenchymal neoplasm of the kidney.[1] It is composed of varying amounts of poorly organized blood vessels, smooth muscles, and varying amount of fat.[2] These tumors classically arise from the cortex and extend outward into perirenal fat. It is extremely rare occurrence for this tumor to arise from renal sinus and cause compression on the renal pelvis. Classical AML is easily diagnosed on cross-sectional imaging; however, fat-poor variant cannot yet be definitively diagnosed and differentiated from renal cell carcinoma (RCC).[2] In our present case, renal sinus AML presented with hematuria and underwent radical nephroureterectomy as it could not be differentiated from transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) on imaging. After a thorough review, there are only 16 reported cases of renal sinus AML, this being the first case from India to best of our knowledge.


   Case Report Top


A 28-year-old female presented with dull aching pain in her right flank for one and a half months along with two episodes of gross hematuria with the passage of worm-like clots. There was no history of dysuria, fatigue, fever, or decreased urinary output. The patient did not suffer from any chronic medical ailment or bleeding disorders. There is no history of tobacco consumption in any form. Physical examination revealed no significant abnormality. Routine laboratory investigations were within normal limits. Urinalysis revealed red blood cell 100–200/HPF, pus cells 2–3/HPF, negative for nitrites, and leukocyte esterase. Urine cytology for malignant cells was negative. Ultrasonography suggested a focal hypoechoic lesion 25 mm × 20 mm in mid pole of the right kidney extending into renal pelvis. The color flow was seen in the lesion. Internal echos were present in pelvicalyceal system and upper ureter. Computed tomography (CT) urography reported an ill-defined hyperdense lesion, 23 mm × 18 mm × 23 mm, in right renal pelvis showing heterogeneous enhancement on postcontrast scans (Hounsfield unit [HU] ~80) with associated moderate dilatation of the right pelvicalyceal system suggestive of TCC or vascular malformation [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]. With a suspicion of TCC, the right nephroureterectomy was performed. Biopsy report was grossly suggestive of well-circumscribed submucosal renal pelvic mass 2.5 cm × 2cm × 1.5 cm. On microscopy, sections of mass showed a tumor predominantly composed of mature adipose tissue, scattered blood vessels, and proliferated lymphoplasmacytic cells. It also showed spindle cells which on immunohistochemistry stained negative for desmin, H-Caldesmon and Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) but took red stain with Masson trichrome stain suggestive of smooth muscle cells.
Figure 1: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography showing enhancing lesion within pelvis with filling defect (arrowhead) on excretory pyelogram

Click here to view
Figure 2: Gross specimen of nephroureterectomy. Well-circumscribed lesion seen in the pelvis of the right kidney (arrowhead)

Click here to view
Figure 3: Microscopic image showing variable components of vessels, smooth muscles, and fat

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


AML is the most common benign mesenchymal neoplasm of the kidney. It is composed of varying amounts of poorly organized blood vessels, smooth muscles, and varying amount of fat.[2] These constitute of <10% of all renal tumors. Although initially considered a form of hamartoma, they are now considered to belong to a family of neoplasms called perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (“PEComas”).[2]

Most AML occurs sporadically with 20%–30% cases associated with tuberous sclerosis. Two AML most commonly present in middle-aged females as flank pain and hematuria. They are also the most common neoplasms associated with spontaneous hemorrhage, the risk of which increase as the size of tumor increases.[2]

These tumors usually arise in the renal cortex and expand into the perirenal fat. It is extremely rare for this tumor to arise from the renal sinus and cause compression of the renal pelvis. Classical AML is easily diagnosed on cross-sectional imaging; however, fat-poor variant cannot yet be definitively diagnosed and differentiated from RCC. On noncontrast CT, AML appears as well-circumscribed mass showing areas of hypo attenuation (−20 HU) which is typical of these tumors. However, fat poor AML, occurring in 5% cases, differentiation from other solid masses is less likely.[2] In our case, imaging characteristics were not typical of AML and along with its rare location, the possibility of TCC could not be ruled out.

Tumors of the renal sinus consist of lipomas, leiomyomas, AMLs, etc., and the manifestations are nonspecific. Patients may present with flank pain and gross hematuria specially when the size exceeds 4 cm.[3] Symptomatic tumors mandate resection; however, renal preservation should be considered as far as possible considering the benign nature of the disease.[3] In these centrally located tumors, near the renal hilum nephron-sparing surgeries are technically more demanding with increased incidence of longer ischemia times, collecting system violation, and overall complications.[4] In our case, the pain might have been caused due to compression of the pelvicalyceal system causing its dilatation. In the present study, the patient underwent radical nephroureterectomy with suspicion of TCC of the renal pelvis.

To best of our knowledge, only 16 cases of AML originating from renal sinus have been previously reported and in most of the reports, these underwent a radical surgery due to uncertainty of the nature of the lesion.[3],[5]

In conclusion, AML presenting as renal pelvic masses are extremely rare with only a few cases been reported till date. They are most often misdiagnosed as renal pelvic TCC. The prognosis of sporadic AML is good. With more advanced CT and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging protocols orientation and qualitative diagnosis of these tumors are expected to improve. Preserving the kidney during surgery as far as possible is key for the treatment of patients with such tumors. However, rarity of the tumor, along with difficulty in diagnosing based on the current imaging studies, makes nephron-sparing surgery relatively under-utilized.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Eble JN, Sauter G, Epstein JI, Sesterhenn IA. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2004.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Margulis V, Karam JA, Matin SF, Wood CG. Benign renal tumors. In: Wein AJ, editor. Campbell – Walsh Urology. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2016. p. 1306-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Shirotake S, Yoshimura I, Kosaka T, Matsuzaki S. A case of angiomyolipoma of the renal sinus. Clin Exp Nephrol 2011;15:953-6.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Martorana G, Lupo S, Brunocilla E, Concetti S, Malizia M, Vece E. Role of nephron sparing surgery in the treatment of centrally located renal tumors. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2004;76:51-5.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Cheng B, Cai Q, Wu Y, Zhao Y, Guo Q, Li G, et al. Primary renal sinus tumor: Three case reports with a review of the literature. Oncol Lett 2015;9:829-32.  Back to cited text no. 5
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Report
   Discussion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed96    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded22    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal