Year : 2015 | Volume
: 7 | Issue : 3 | Page : 339--344
Three different anesthesia techniques for a comfortable prostate biopsy
Adnan Sahin, Cavit Ceylan, Eymen Gazel, ÷ner Odabas
Department of Urology, Turkey YŁksek ?htisas Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
Aim: In this paper, we aimed to compare the efficacy of three different anesthesia techniques applied in 90 cases of which transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) -guided prostate biopsies were taken.
Materials and Methods: Between February 2012 and July 2012, TRUS-guided 16 core biopsies were taken from 90 patients who comply the study criteria. Patients were randomly divided into three groups each of which consists of 30 individuals. Group 1: Was applied periprostatic block anesthesia; Group 2: Was administered intrarectal lidocaine gel; Group 3: Was applied pudendal block. Visual analog scale (VAS) of patients in groups was evaluated.
Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the mean ages, prostate-specific antigen values of three groups. Although pain ratings of Groups 2 and 3 were high, no significant difference was present between each other (P > 0.05). In Groups 1 and 2, the difference between VASs was significant. In the group where periprostatic block was applied, pain ratings were significantly low compared with the other two groups (P = 0.0001).
Discussion: Enabling pain and discomfort control in patients is very important during TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. In our study, we observed that the periprostatic block enables more comfortable compared with patient groups with intrarectal lidocaine gel and pudendal block and better reduction in pain scores.
Department of Urology, Turkey YŁksek ?htisas Training and Research Hospital, Ankara
|How to cite this article:|
Sahin A, Ceylan C, Gazel E, Odabas ÷. Three different anesthesia techniques for a comfortable prostate biopsy.Urol Ann 2015;7:339-344
|How to cite this URL:|
Sahin A, Ceylan C, Gazel E, Odabas ÷. Three different anesthesia techniques for a comfortable prostate biopsy. Urol Ann [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 Sep 26 ];7:339-344
Available from: http://www.urologyannals.com/article.asp?issn=0974-7796;year=2015;volume=7;issue=3;spage=339;epage=344;aulast=Sahin;type=0