Urology Annals

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
Year
: 2018  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 347--353

Redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty among children: A systematic review and meta-analysis


Hamdan Hammad Alhazmi 
 Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, College of Medicine and King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Hamdan Hammad Alhazmi
Department of Surgery (37), Division of Urology, College of Medicine and King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, PO Box 7805, Riyadh 11472
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) is more beneficial than open procedures. However, studies on laparoscopic management of cases with secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction (SUPJO) after previous failed pyeloplasty in the pediatric population are lacking. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the difference between redo LP (RLP) and redo open pyeloplasty (ROP) for children with SUPJO, focusing on certain criteria. All recent studies on RLP and ROP in children with SUPJO were searched. Search engines such as Medline, PubMed, and The Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews were used. Sixty citations were specified. Two reviewers extracted data independently, screened the titles, and assessed the quality of each citation. Continuous data reported as a weighted mean difference (WMD) (95% confidence interval) and dichotomous data reported as relative risk were used. We measured the length of hospital stay (LOS) and operative time using weighted mean and success and complication rates using risk difference and odds ratio (OR). A random effects model was used to pool OR that was tested for heterogeneity. We specified six publications that minutely met our eligibility standards. Meta-analysis of given data resulted in the following: ROP showed reduction in operative time by 12 min (WMD: 12.7 min; P = 0.14). RLP had shorter LOS than ROP (WMD: 0.6 days; P < 0.01). No difference was observed in complication and success rates (OR: 0.8; P = 0.50 and OR: 1.2; P = 0.51, respectively). In conclusion, RLP seems to be better than ROP in terms of LOS reduction; however, both are comparable with respect to success and complication rates, especially postoperative urine leakage.


How to cite this article:
Alhazmi HH. Redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty among children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Urol Ann 2018;10:347-353


How to cite this URL:
Alhazmi HH. Redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty among children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Ann [serial online] 2018 [cited 2018 Dec 15 ];10:347-353
Available from: http://www.urologyannals.com/article.asp?issn=0974-7796;year=2018;volume=10;issue=4;spage=347;epage=353;aulast=Alhazmi;type=0