Urology Annals
About UA | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Online submissionLogin 
Urology Annals
  Editorial Board | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact
Users Online: 454   Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 101-106

Laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy: The clinical efficacy and acceptance of the techniques


1 Department of Urology, Armed Forces Hospital Southern Region, Khamis Mushait, Saudi Arabia
2 Department of Urology, University of Patras, Greece
3 Department of Urology, University of Leipzig, Germany

Correspondence Address:
Abdulrahman Al-Aown
P. O. Box: 11740, Abha 61321
Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/0974-7796.130521

PMID: 24833817

Rights and Permissions

The laparoscopic approach has been established as the surgical procedure of choice for radical nephrectomy during the recent years. The advantages of the laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in comparison to the open approach are well-documented. The oncological results of the laparoscopic approach are similar to the open procedure while the post-operative morbidity is lower. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy seems to gain ground to its open counterpart, as the accumulation of experience in the technique grows. In this review, a PubMed search in the latest literature on radical and partial laparoscopic nephrectomy took place and the outcome of the search is presented. Several issues about the surgical techniques and clinical efficacy are discussed. In addition, the preliminary experience in laparoscopic nephrectomy of one of the authoring institutions is also presented.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2481    
    Printed59    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded447    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal