Urology Annals
About UA | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Online submissionLogin 
Urology Annals
  Editorial Board | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact
Users Online: 275   Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size

Table of Contents
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 187-191  

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: A preliminary report

1 Department of Urology, Division of Pediatric Urology, Assiut University Hospitals, Assiut, Egypt
2 Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia

Date of Submission24-Apr-2014
Date of Acceptance27-Apr-2014
Date of Web Publication12-Jun-2014

Correspondence Address:
Ahmad A. Elderwy
Department of Urology, Division of Pediatric Urology, Assiut University Hospitals, Assiut 71515
Login to access the Email id

DOI: 10.4103/0974-7796.134255

PMID: 25125889

Rights and Permissions

Objectives: The recurrence of pediatric nephrolithiasis, the morbidity of repeated open surgical treatment as well as our experience in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) in adult patients, all derived us to shift to PNL for managing renal stones >1.5 cm in pediatric patients. Our aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PNL in pediatric patients.
Materials and Methods: During the period of the month between May 2011 and April 2013, 38 children (47 renal units) underwent PNL for renal stones 1.5-5 cm in length. Patient demographics, stone characteristics, and clinical outcome were prospectively studied. Data of those who underwent conventional and tubeless PNL were compared. Median follow-up period was 12 months (range: 6-24).
Results: The median age at presentation was 8-year (range: 3-12). The operative time ranged from 30 to 120 min (median 90). Overall stone clearance rate was 91.5% after single PNL. The median hospital stay was 3 days. Auxiliary procedures were successful for the remaining 4 patients (nephroscopic clearance in one and shockwave lithotripsy in 3). Tubeless PNL was performed in 17 renal units with a comparable outcome to conventional ones. The perioperative complications were noted in 5/47 (10.6%) of all procedures (Clavien Grade II in 4 and Clavien Grade IIIa in 1) and were managed conservatively.
Conclusions: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones in pediatric patients is safe and feasible if performed by a well-experienced endourologist. Tubeless PNL is a better choice for children.

Keywords: Nephrolithiasis, pediatric urolithiasis, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy

How to cite this article:
Elderwy AA, Gadelmoula M, Elgammal MA, Osama E, Al-Hazmi H, Hammouda H, Osman E, Abdullah MA, Neel KF. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: A preliminary report. Urol Ann 2014;6:187-91

How to cite this URL:
Elderwy AA, Gadelmoula M, Elgammal MA, Osama E, Al-Hazmi H, Hammouda H, Osman E, Abdullah MA, Neel KF. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: A preliminary report. Urol Ann [serial online] 2014 [cited 2021 Oct 19];6:187-91. Available from: https://www.urologyannals.com/text.asp?2014/6/3/187/134255

   Introduction Top

Pediatric nephrolithiasis is increasing globally and is endemic in developing countries. It is usually associated with urinary tract infection (UTI), anatomical and metabolic abnormalities, together with climate and dietary factors. Therefore, nephrolithiasis in children has a high rate of recurrence; with an overall 5-year recurrence rate of 55% (95% confidence interval: 38-70%). [1],[2]

The treatment options for pediatric stones are shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) and open/laparoscopic stone surgery. The ideal treatment modality is that with high stone clearance rate and low morbidity. In view of this, SWL is generally preferred for renal stone <1 cm and PNL offers high stone clearance with low morbidity for upper urinary tract stones >1.5 cm. [1],[3]

Woodside et al. were the first to report successful PNL in a 14-year-old child in 1985. Afterwards, the procedure became more popular and was enforced by wider experience in adult PNL and miniaturization of the equipment. Nowadays, PNL has become the standard treatment for renal stones >1.5 cm in preschool-aged patients. [3] Furthermore, a "mini-perc"/tubeless PNL technique has been introduced to reduce the morbidity of the standard PNL with comparable stone clearance. [1],[4] Herein, we introduce our early experience with PNL in managing pediatric stones and demonstrate the outcome of tubeless PNL in comparison to the standard one.

   Materials and methods Top

The study was reviewed and approved by our institutional ethical review boards and informed consent was obtained from the family of each child. Between May 2011 and April 2013, a total of 38 children underwent PNL for renal stones in our hospitals. Nine patients had bilateral renal stones with a total of 47 PNL procedures performed. Patient, stone(s) and upper tract-related factors were recorded in a prospective database. Inclusion criteria included: Stone burden >1.5 cm with functioning renal unit, no UTI, no anatomical renal abnormalities and a minimum of 6 months follow-up postoperatively. Three patients had percutaneous nephrostomy tube (NT) inserted initially to drain infected hydronephrosis. Those with documented UTI underwent surgery 1-week after clearance of infection. For cases with bilateral stones, asynchronous procedures were performed.

Preoperative investigations in the form of urinalysis, renal function tests, complete blood count, coagulation profile, random blood sugar, abdominal ultrasonography (US), plain abdominal X-ray (kidneys, ureters, bladder [KUB]), noncontrast computerized tomography (NCCT) were done in all patients. Fifteen patients already had intravenous urography done outside our hospitals. Renal scan using 99m technetieum dimercapto-succinic acid (DMSA) was indicated for those with severe hydronephrosis and cortical thinning.

The procedure was started under general anesthesia (GA), with administration of intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotic 1 h before induction of GA. With the child in lithotomy position, an 8.5-French pediatric Storz cystoscopy was initially performed to place an ipsilateral 4- or 5-French ureteral catheter (UC). Later, the patient was placed in the prone position. Iodinated contrast media was injected through UC and the renal access was performed under fluoroscopic guidance. Tract dilatation was performed using graded dilators up to a 24-French and then an Amplatz sheath 20- or 24-French was introduced (according to surgeon preference). A 17-French Wolf rigid nephroscope was used for all cases and a flexible 15-French nephroscope was available when indicated. Stones were fragmented with a pneumatic lithotripter and extracted by grasper. Number and location of access points, blood loss, hospitalization time, stone burden, stone clearance, and complications (according to the modified Clavien classification) were recorded. [5] Success was defined if stones are totally removed without the need for an auxiliary procedure.

After confirmation of stone clearance fluoroscopically, UC was left in all cases. According to surgeon choice, a 14-French NT was left in the renal pelvis (conventional PNL) or not (tubeless PNL). For unreachable significant fragments (≥4 mm), the UC was replaced by double-J stent prior to SWL.

On postoperative day 1, documentation KUB (for radio-opaque stones) and US were performed. When the urine was clear, NT was to be removed by the 1 st or 2 nd postoperative day followed by UC removal 1-2 days later in case there was no leakage or fever. In tubeless PNL, UC was removed once the urine was clear with no leakage or fever. Stone analysis was performed for all cases. All patients were advised to take plenty of oral fluids and low-salt diet. For cystine stones, patients were maintained on potassium sodium hydrogen citrate 1 mEq/kg/day in 2-3 divided doses. For struvite/matrix stones, stone and urine cultures were done and patients were maintained on the appropriate antibiotics for 3 consecutive months. The follow-up visits were scheduled at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months postoperatively; where urinalysis and US were performed for all patients. Further management was individualized.

Statistical analysis was performed using inter-cooled STATA® , version 9.2, Texas, USA. Analysis included; the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for comparison of the categorical data, and the Mann-Whitney U-test (values expressed as median, inter-quartile range) compare the noncategorical data.

   Results Top

A total of 25 boys and 13 girls, aged ranges between 3 and 12 years (median 8), underwent 47 PNL procedures. Right sided PNL was done for 21 cases. Previous ipsilateral open renal surgery for stones was recorded in 7 children. UTI (42%), hematuria (37%), and abdominal pain (21%) were the common presenting symptoms. Three units had already a NT access to drain an infected kidney. Radiolucent renal stones were detected in 10 patients. Stones were single in 42.5% (pelvic in 34%, in calyceal in 8.5%), multiple (pelvic and calyceal) in 49% and staghorn in 8.5%. HN was noted in 35 renal units, with severe HN detected in 6 (split renal function ranged from 10% to 24% in DMSA scan). No associated metabolic abnormalities were noted in any of the patients.

Stone length ranged from 1.5 to 5 cm (median 2.3). Only one subcostal access was established in each procedure using 20-Fr Amplatz in 13 patients and 24-Fr Amplatz in the rest. Access was gained through the lower posterior calyx in 39 units and through the middle calyx in 8. After completion of PNL, 17 procedures passed tubeless and the rest (30/47 patients) had a 14-French NT left in the renal pelvis [comparison between conventional and tubeless PNL is shown in [Table 1]]. The operative time ranged from 30 to 120 min (median 90). The median hospital stay was 3 days (range: 2-15).
Table 1: Comparison of conventional versus tubeless PNL

Click here to view

As regards the stone clearance; 43 units were clear after the first session PNL. Nephroscopic clearance under GA through the same access tract was performed for one patient 2 days postoperatively. Single session SWL under GA was performed for 3 patients with unreachable fragments after 3-4 weeks in the presence of double-J stent. Accordingly, our initial stone-free rate (SFR) was 91.5% and cumulative SFR after auxiliary procedures was 100% at 3 months follow-up visit [Figure 1] and [Figure 2].
Figure 1: Non-contrast computerized tomography (a and b) and matrix calculi specimen after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) (c) of a 3-year-old girl with recurrent bilateral stagging renal stones 3.8 cm on the right side and 4.5 cm on the left. She underwent successful eventless asynchronous bilateral tubeless PNL (1 month apart). Stone culture showed proteus mirabilis infection. The patient received prophylactive trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole at dose of 2/10 mg/kg at bedtime for 3 months. No recurrence was noticed after 18 months of follow-up

Click here to view
Figure 2: Kidneys, ureters, bladder (a), IVU after 30 min (b) and postoperative KUB (c) of a 12-year-old boy showing a 2.5-cm left renal pelvis stone and 7, 6 mm lower calyceal calculi. Non-contrast computerized tomography scan showed no retrorenal colon. Conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy through the lower calyx was successfully done with smooth postoperative recovery. He was discharged from the hospital after 4 days

Click here to view

Overall complications were noted in 5/47 (10.6%) of patients; Clavien Grade II in 4 patients and Grade IIIa in 1 patient. Tubeless PNL was not associated with more complications/auxiliary procedures than conventional PNL [Table 1]. There was no significant bleeding that necessitates transfusion in any except one case with staghorn stone. No case required open conversion. Two cases, with previously infected kidney and NT, suffered from postoperative high grade fever for 24 h in spite of absence of significant growth in urine culture from the NTs prior to PNL and they were managed conservatively. One case, with severe HN preoperatively, developed leakage of urine after removal of the UC (with no stone on postoperative NCCT) and resolved spontaneously by the 6 th postoperative day. An 11-year-old girl had recurrent hematuria for 5 days after PNL, for which renal angiography was done and revealed no abnormalities. The patient was then treated conservatively.

Stone analysis was available for 42 procedures and revealed calcium oxalate in 15 (31.9%), uric acid in 7 (14.9%), struvite in 6 (12.7%), matrix in 3 (6.4%), cystine in 3 (6.4%) and mixed in the rest (27.7%). After a median follow-up period of 12 months (range: 6-24), all patients were stone-free; no recurrence or hydronephrosis was encountered.

   Discussion Top

Pediatric urolithiasis is usually associated with metabolic disturbances or UTI, which leads to multiple recurrences or with obstructive anomalies that necessitate reconstruction along with removal of the stone, hence the validity of PNL in treating such stones. [1]

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for pediatric renal stones >2 cm is associated with less hospital stay, less blood transfusion and less JJ stent implantation, compared with open surgery. Both techniques had comparable outcome. [6] Moreover, pediatric PNL has higher stone-free and lower re-treatment rates for 1-2 cm renal stones, compared with SWL. [7] When comparing PNL to RIRS for renal stones 1-3 cm, both have similar SFR and complication rate, although RIRS is associated with shorter operative time and hospital stay as well as no blood transfusion required. [8] Further studies are still needed to confirm such benefits of RIRS. Our results are comparable to pediatric PNL in the literature; [Table 2]. [9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17] Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society PNL Global Study showed that pediatric PNL has similar success and complication rates to those in adults in presence of appropriate evaluation, equipments and experience. [12] Extended indications of PNL in children were addressed by Samad et al. to include those with anatomically abnormal kidneys, impaired renal function and synchronous bilateral PNL. [10]
Table 2: Outcomes of pediatric PNL in the literature

Click here to view

Regarding the age of the child at interference, many series stated the safety and efficacy of PNL in all pediatric age groups including infants. [17] Although we routinely used NCCT, for preoperative evaluation of PNL for surgical planning and to exclude retrorenal colon (up to 4.4% in normally situated kidneys), some authors suggest that intravenous urography may be enough for those with no anatomical renal abnormalities or previous ipsilateral renal surgery. [18] To minimize children exposure to radiation, we did postoperative NCCT in one case only with persistent urine leak after NT removal to exclude any migrating ureteral stones, otherwise KUB and US were used to define our SFR.

In our practice, we limited fluoroscopy time to the minimum. Alternatively, ultrasound guidance of pediatric PNL provides less radiation exposure, no adjacent organ injury, and equivalent outcome as fluoroscopic guidance. [19] A single subcostal puncture was used in all of our cases. It was shown that supracostal PNL in children is similar to the subcostal ones, however the complication rate in the former (15-50%) is relatively higher. [13],[20]

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric population was reported using either the adult-size or pediatric instruments with no significant difference in the clinical outcome. [17],[20] Although the smallest adult-size instrument (17-Fr rigid nephroscope) had been used in the current study with reasonable outcome, we recommend using the pediatric instruments to minimize the potential impact on such growing kidneys, and to decrease the blood loss and painful incisions. Moreover, the operative time is not significantly longer with the use of pediatric nephroscopes. Ultra-mini-PNL using a novel 6-Fr mininephroscope through an 11-13 Fr metal sheath together with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy is an interesting alternative for renal stones <2 cm. [21] The nephrostomy-less and the totally tubeless PNL are increasingly practiced in the literature and reported to be safe and effective procedures for both adults and children; with a significant reduction of hospital stay and analgesic requirement. [17],[20],[22] In our study, the outcomes of the nephrostomy-less and conventional PNL were comparable and hence tubeless PNL can be done safely for children.

Second-look PNL is getting more popularity among the endourologists, especially in adults where it is usually done under local anesthesia. On the contrary, it has to be done under GA in children. [23] In our study, both SWL and nephroscopic clearance for residual stones were comparable, so decision for such cases should be individualized as both will be done under GA. Flexible ureteroscope (which was temporarily unavailable during our study period) and/or multiple puncture PNL can improve SFR and minimize auxiliary procedures. [1],[9]

As regards the complication of PNL in the pediatric population, many series stated that it is comparable to those in adults. [12] In our study we had 10.6% with minor complications that were managed conservatively, which is acceptable as our early experience. According to the largest pediatric PNL study; a longer operative time, larger sheath size, mid calyceal puncture and partial staghorn stones were the predictors of complicated PNL on multivariate logistic regression analysis. [9]

We did not notice any recurrence after our short follow-up (median 12 months) probably because of our patients' adherence to the instructions and follow-up visits. The reported stone recurrence rate after pediatric PNL was 2.4-31.2% within a follow-up period of 0.5-11 years. This was usually related to re-growth of residual stone fragments, duration of follow-up and cystine stones. [7],[10],[24]

   Conclusion Top

We presented our initial experience of pediatric PNL. In our hands (after many years of practicing adult PNL), the procedure is quite safe and effective. With accumulating experience, we will be able to do tubeless PNL with earlier hospital discharge of our patients. Limitations of our study include the relatively small number of cases, lack of randomization and the short-term follow-up.

   References Top

1.Smaldone MC, Docimo SG, Ost MC. Contemporary surgical management of pediatric urolithiasis. Urol Clin North Am 2010;37:253-67.  Back to cited text no. 1
2.Lao M, Kogan BA, White MD, Feustel PJ. High recurrence rate at 5-year followup in children after upper urinary tract stone surgery. J Urol 2014;191:440-4.  Back to cited text no. 2
3.Jackman SV, Hedican SP, Peters CA, Docimo SG. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in infants and preschool age children: Experience with a new technique. Urology 1998;52:697-701.  Back to cited text no. 3
4.Helal M, Black T, Lockhart J, Figueroa TE. The Hickman peel-away sheath: Alternative for pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 1997;11:171-2.  Back to cited text no. 4
5.Ozden E, Mercimek MN, Yakupoglu YK, Ozkaya O, Sarikaya S. Modified Clavien classification in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Assessment of complications in children. J Urol 2011;185:264-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
6.Bayrak O, Seckiner I, Erturhan S, Duzgun I, Yagci F. Comparative analyses of percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus open surgery in pediatric urinary stone disease. Pediatr Surg Int 2012;28:1025-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
7.Shokeir AA, Sheir KZ, El-Nahas AR, El-Assmy AM, Eassa W, El-Kappany HA. Treatment of renal stones in children: A comparison between percutaneous nephrolithotomy and shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 2006;176:706-10.  Back to cited text no. 7
8.Resorlu B, Unsal A, Tepeler A, Atis G, Tokatli Z, Oztuna D, et al. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children with moderate-size kidney stones: Results of multi-institutional analysis. Urology 2012;80:519-23.  Back to cited text no. 8
9.Onal B, Dogan HS, Satar N, Bilen CY, Günes A, Ozden E, et al. Factors affecting complication rates of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: Results of a multi-institutional retrospective analysis by the Turkish pediatric urology society. J Urol 2014;191:777-82.  Back to cited text no. 9
10.Samad L, Aquil S, Zaidi Z. Paediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Setting new frontiers. BJU Int 2006;97:359-63.  Back to cited text no. 10
11.Holman E, Khan AM, Flasko T, Toth C, Salah MA. Endoscopic management of pediatric urolithiasis in a developing country. Urology 2004;63:159-62.  Back to cited text no. 11
12.Guven S, Frattini A, Onal B, Desai M, Montanari E, Kums J, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children in different age groups: Data from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study. BJU Int 2013;111:148-56.  Back to cited text no. 12
13.Bhageria A, Nayak B, Seth A, Dogra PN, Kumar R. Paediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Single-centre 10-year experience. J Pediatr Urol 2013;9:472-5.  Back to cited text no. 13
14.Rizvi SA, Naqvi SA, Hussain Z, Hashmi A, Hussain M, Zafar MN, et al. Management of pediatric urolithiasis in Pakistan: Experience with 1,440 children. J Urol 2003;169:634-7.  Back to cited text no. 14
15.Badawy H, Salama A, Eissa M, Kotb E, Moro H, Shoukri I. Percutaneous management of renal calculi: Experience with percutaneous nephrolithotomy in 60 children. J Urol 1999;162:1710-3.  Back to cited text no. 15
16.Raza A, Turna B, Smith G, Moussa S, Tolley DA. Pediatric urolithiasis: 15 years of local experience with minimally invasive endourological management of pediatric calculi. J Urol 2005;174:682-5.  Back to cited text no. 16
17.Bilen CY, Gunay M, Ozden E, Inci K, Sarikaya S, Tekgul S. Tubeless mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in infants and preschool children: A preliminary report. J Urol 2010;184:2498-502.  Back to cited text no. 17
18.Tepeler A, Sancaktutar AA, Taskiran M, Silay MS, Bodakci MN, Akman T, et al. Preoperative evaluation of pediatric kidney stone prior to percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Is computed tomography really necessary? Urolithiasis 2013;41:505-10.  Back to cited text no. 18
19.Penbegül N, Tepeler A, Sancaktutar AA, Bozkurt Y, Atar M, Yildirim K, et al. Safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of urinary stone disease in children. Urology 2012;79:1015-9.  Back to cited text no. 19
20.Bilen CY, Koçak B, Kitirci G, Ozkaya O, Sarikaya S. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: Lessons learned in 5 years at a single institution. J Urol 2007;177:1867-71.  Back to cited text no. 20
21.Desai J, Zeng G, Zhao Z, Zhong W, Chen W, Wu W. A novel technique of ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Introduction and an initial experience for treatment of upper urinary calculi less than 2 cm. Biomed Res Int 2013;2013:490793.  Back to cited text no. 21
22.Istanbulluoglu MO, Cicek T, Ozturk B, Gonen M, Ozkardes H. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Nephrostomy or tubeless or totally tubeless? Urology 2010;75:1043-6.  Back to cited text no. 22
23.Roth CC, Donovan BO, Adams JM, Kibar Y, Frimberger D, Kropp BP. Use of second look nephroscopy in children undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 2009;181:796-800.  Back to cited text no. 23
24.Onal B, Dogan C, Citgez S, Argun B, Onder AU, Sever L, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children with cystine stone: Long-term outcomes from a single institution. J Urol 2013;190:234-7.  Back to cited text no. 24


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]

  [Table 1], [Table 2]

This article has been cited by
1 Advantages of tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of preschool children under 3years old
Guanglu Song,Xiaoli Guo,Gang Niu,Yujie Wang
Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article
    Materials and me...
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded483    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal