Urology Annals
About UA | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Online submissionLogin 
Urology Annals
  Editorial Board | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact
Users Online: 669   Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size


 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 199-204  

Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion weighted magnetic resonance image in staging and grading of carcinoma bladder with histopathological correlation


1 Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Urology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India

Date of Submission26-Dec-2013
Date of Acceptance01-Mar-2014
Date of Web Publication11-Mar-2015

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Binit Sureka
Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi - 110 029
India
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/0974-7796.150480

PMID: 25835087

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Background: Bladder cancer is the second most common neoplasm of the urinary tract worldwide. Dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI has been introduced in clinical MRI protocols of bladder cancer because of its accuracy in staging and grading.
Aim: To evaluate and compare accuracy of Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) and Diffusion weighted (DW) MRI for preoperative T staging of urinary bladder cancer and find correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and maximum enhancement with histological grade.
Materials and Methods: Sixty patients with bladder cancer were included in study. All patients underwent Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) on a 1.5-T scanner with a phased-array pelvic coil. MR images were evaluated and assigned a stage which was compared with the histolopathological staging. ADC value and maximum enhancement curve were used based on previous studies. Subsequently histological grade was compared with MR characteristics.
Results: The extent of agreement between the radiologic staging and histopathological staging was relatively greater with the DW-MRI (κ=0.669) than DCE-MRI (κ=0.619). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy are maximum and similar for stage T4 tumors in both DCEMRI (100.0, 96.2 and 96.7) and DW-MRI (100.0, 96.2 and 96.7) while minimum for stage T2 tumors - DCEMRI (83.3, 72.2, and 76.7) and DWI-MRI (91.7, 72.2, and 80).
Conclusion: MRI is an effective tool for determining T stage and histological grade of urinary bladder cancers. Stage T2a and T2b can be differentiated only by DCE-MRI. Results were more accurate when both ADC and DCE-MRI were used together and hence a combined approach is suggested.

Keywords: Digits, hand, upper limb, varicosities, varicose veins


How to cite this article:
Gupta N, Sureka B, Kumar MM, Malik A, Bhushan TB, Mohanty N K. Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion weighted magnetic resonance image in staging and grading of carcinoma bladder with histopathological correlation. Urol Ann 2015;7:199-204

How to cite this URL:
Gupta N, Sureka B, Kumar MM, Malik A, Bhushan TB, Mohanty N K. Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion weighted magnetic resonance image in staging and grading of carcinoma bladder with histopathological correlation. Urol Ann [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 Oct 24];7:199-204. Available from: https://www.urologyannals.com/text.asp?2015/7/2/199/150480


   Introduction Top


Bladder cancer is the second most common neoplasm of the urinary tract worldwide, prostate cancer being first. [1] It accounts for 6-8% of overall malignancy in men and 2-3% in women, with the highest incidence rates in North American and Europe, as well as in areas with endemic schistosomiasis (Africa and the Middle East). It is more common in men than women (3:1) and typically occurs in patients over the age of 50. [2] They are broadly classified as either epithelial or nonepithelial (mesenchymal) tumor. On an average 90-95% of bladder neoplasms arise from the epithelium, the most common subtype is transitional cell carcinoma (90%). [1] Mesenchymal tumors represent the remaining 5% of bladder tumors, with the most common subtypes being rhabdomyosarcoma, in children, and leiomyosarcomas, in adults. Many chemicals are thought to be carcinogens for bladder cancer includes aniline dyes, benzidine, B-naphthylamine and other potential bladder cancer carcinogens. [3],[4],[5] Cigarette smoking is the strongest risk factor for bladder cancer. [6] Age is also a risk factor for developing bladder cancer, which occurs more commonly in the elderly. [7]

Hematuria is the most common symptom. [8] Irritative voiding symptoms such as frequency or dysuria can also be the presenting symptoms. The clinical assessment consists of urine cytology for malignant cells, urine for tumor marker, hemograms, liver and kidney function tests, cystoscopic examination and examination under anesthesia. Radiological evaluation is a significant part of diagnosis and staging of bladder cancer. Grey scale sonography is initial modality to confirm the presence of the lesion, evaluate morphology of tumor, perivesical extension, lateral pelvic wall involvement, lymph node status, to exclude metastasis and to look for back pressure changes in kidneys. Intravesical US is more promising than noninvasive transmission assessment surveys. [9] Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the main radiologic examinations used in the evaluation of patients with bladder cancer. There is still controversy about which imaging modality is better. The advantages of CT include shorter acquisition time, wider coverage in a single breath hold, and lower susceptibility to various patient factors. However, CT scan is unable to differentiate between stage T2a and T2b. [10],[11],[12] MRI has superior soft tissue resolution and poorer spatial resolution compared with CT. Faster dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI helps to differentiate bladder tumor from surrounding tissues as enhancement of the tumor occurs earlier than the normal bladder wall due to neovascularization. [13] On the other hand, diffusion-weighted MRI has been introduced in clinical MRI protocols because of its higher contrast resolution and ability to detect and reflect molecular diffusion restriction in malignant tissue. [14],[15] In general, gadolinium enhancement is most useful in detecting and staging early-stage disease. Microscopic extravesical spread (T3a disease) cannot be reliably identified, but MRI readily shows macroscopic extravesical extension (T3b disease). Direct bony invasion should also be detectable. According to Tekes et al., gadolinium-enhanced MRI has accuracy of 85% in differentiating noninvasive versus invasive disease and of 82% in differentiating organ-confined from nonorgan-confined disease. [16]


   Materials and methods Top


The retrospective study was given clearance by Institutional Ethical Committee. During the period between January 2011 and November 2012, 60 patients with presumed diagnosis of the urinary bladder carcinoma either clinically or by other investigations like ultrasound, underwent DCE-MRI within 3 weeks of diagnosis. Patient with previous biopsy/resection were excluded from the study. Urinary bladder carcinoma was subsequently confirmed on histopathology of the operated specimen. Staging and grading of tumors were analyzed on MRI and compared with the operative and histopathological findings.

The MRI technique

Patients were instructed to start drinking water 2 h before the MRI study and to present with a full bladder. Patients were imaged using Philips 1.5 T whole body MRI Intera Achieva machine using dedicated pelvic coil, with a field of view of 26-28 cm. T1-weighted images were obtained in axial and sagittal planes with a T1-weighted turbo spin-echo sequence. Similarly, T2-weighted images obtained in both axial and sagittal planes. These sequences were used to locate tumoral lesions and to reveal their morphologic characteristics.

Diffusion-weighted MRI

Before gadolinium-enhanced imaging, respiratory-triggered diffusion-weighted images were obtained in a transaxial plane using a single-shot echo-planar sequence (TReff/TEeff = 2790-4560/88 ms); b factors, 0 and 1000 s/mm; 5-mm section thickness with a 2-mm intersection gap. Spectral inversion recovery fat suppression technique was used to eliminate chemical shift artifacts.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI

Performed in the axial plane and if required in the sagittal plane using two-dimensional T1FFE sequences with an intravenous bolus injection. The contrast was administered by hand injection of 0.1 mmol/kg of body weight of a gadolinium chelate followed by a flush of 20 ml of saline solution. 8-10 dynamic scans, each lasting 20-30 s, were performed sequentially in 5 min using parameters identical to those of the unenhanced sequence. The onset of the contrast injection and the data acquisition was triggered synchronously.


   Staging and gradin Top


Diffusion weighted MRI ]

Diffusion-weighted images (DWI) were interpreted referring to T1- and T2-weighted images. The bladder wall was identified as a thin line of slight hyperintensity on DWI. [17],[18]

  • Stage T1: Hyperintensity of tumor within the bladder lumen
  • StageT2: Hyperintensity of tumor partially seen in the bladder wall
  • StageT3: Hyperintensity of tumor disrupting the bladder wall
  • StageT4: Hyperintensity of tumor extending into the adjacent organs, abdominal or pelvic wall.


The mean ADCs of G1, G2, and G3 tumors in our study were:

G1: >1400 × 10−3 mm 2 /s; G2: 1400-1000 × 10−3 mm 2 /s and G3: < 1000 × 10−3 mm 2 /s.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI

With DCE-MRI, bladder tumors, mucosa, and submucosa enhance early, but [17],[18],[19] the muscle layer maintains its hypointensity.

  • Stage T1: Intact muscle layer at the base of the tumor that shows low signal intensity on T2-weighted MRI and no early enhancement on DCE-MRI
  • Stage T2a: Irregular inner margin of the bladder wall muscle's hypointense line with or without enhancement difference
  • Stage T2b: Disrupted hypointense line and early enhancement without perivesical fat infiltration
  • Stage T3b: Lesion with an irregular shaggy outer border and streaky areas in perivesical fat of the same signal intensity as the tumor
  • Stage T4: Lesion extending into an adjacent organ or abdominal and pelvic side walls with the same signal intensity of the primary tumor.


Time-intensity curves

Time-intensity curves were also constructed from signal intensity values obtained [18],[19]from freely drawn regions of interest selected on the basis of optimal visualization of the lesion and the region of greatest enhancement.

  • Grade1: Time-intensity curve shows enhancement, followed by a slow increase
  • Grade 2: Time-intensity curve shows enhancement, followed by a plateau
  • Grade 3: Time-intensity curve shows enhancement, followed by washout.


Statistical analysis

Data was analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 17.0. Manufactured by IBM. Chi-square test, Friedman test, Wilcoxon signed rank test, analysis of variance and Kappa statistic was applied for comparison of data. Diagnostic efficacy was depicted in terms of sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value and diagnostic accuracy. The level of confidence was kept at 95% hence a P < 0.05 indicated a significant association. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MRI were assessed on a stage-by-stage basis, and the gold standard was pathologic confirmation in all cases. Histologic staging conformed to the updated TNM system of the International Union against Cancer.

In addition, data were regrouped to evaluate the accuracy of MRI staging in distinguishing superficial (≤T1) from invasive (≥T2) tumors and organ-confined (≤T2b) from nonorgan-confined (≥ T3) tumors.


   Results Top


Study was performed on 60 patients, clinically suspected to have bladder cancers based on clinical presentation, urine cytology and ultrasound findings. The age range in the study group was 35-89 years similar results reported by Lynch and Cohen et al. [20] and Horner et al. [7] There were 48 male and 12 female patients. The male to female ratio in the study was 4:1, similar results described by Jemal et al. [2] The most common presenting symptom in the study was hematuria (86.7%) with or without other symptoms such as poor stream, hesitancy, and dysuria. Few patients were asymptomatic and detected during investigation unrelated to the disease. The similar findings were described by Varkarakis et al. [21] and Wakui et al. [8]

Histopathological examination (HPE) revealed 58.33% of cases presented with Stage I disease. The detailed number of patients with staging and grading is represented in [Table 1] and [Table 2]. Staging accuracy of DCE-MRI found to be 73.3%. Statistically, the extent of agreement between HPE and DCE-MRI was substantial (κ =0.690) and significant (P < 0.001). The detailed results of comparison of DCE-MRI staging with HPE staging is represented in [Table 3]. Diagnostic accuracy of DW-MRI for local (T) staging found to be 76.7%. Statistically, the extent of agreement HPE and DW-MRI was substantial (κ =0.669) and significant (P < 0.001). The detailed results of comparison of DW-MRI staging with HPE staging is represented in [Table 4]. An absolute agreement between DW and DCE methods was observed for 50/60 (83.3%) cases. Measure of agreement (κ =0.764) showed substantial agreement between DCE and DW methods for 'T' staging [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]. Accuracy against gold standard was of relatively higher order in DCE (73.3%) and DWI (76.7%) and the difference between two methods was not significant statistically (P = 0.655). For grading, diagnostic accuracy of DCE-MRI was observed to be 73.3%, maximum for Grade II (90%), and minimum for Grade I (58.3%). Statistically, the extent of agreement between HPE and DCE-MRI was substantial (κ =0.600) and significant (P < 0.001). Diagnostic accuracy of DW-MRI (ADC value) for grading of bladder cancer observed to be 80%, maximum for Grade l (91.7%) and minimum for Grade II (60%) [Figure 5].
Figure 1: Stage 1 Grade 2 transitional cell carcinoma (a and b) T1- and T2-weighted image shows a single polypoidal intraluminal anterior wall mass (c) diffusion-weighted images a single polypoidal intraluminal anterior wall mass with diffusion restriction (d) dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging shows a single polypoidal intraluminal anterior wall mass showing intense enhancement

Click here to view
Figure 2: Stage 2 Grade 1 transitional cell carcinoma (a and b) T1- and T2-weighted image showing single intraluminal mass near left VesicoUreteric Junction (L-VUJ) (c) diffusion-weighted images shoes restricted diffusion (d) dynamic contrast-enhanced image showing rapidly enhancing single intraluminal mass near L-VUJ followed by slow increase

Click here to view
Figure 3: Stage T3b and Grade 3 carcinosarcoma (a) T1-W image showing left posterolateral wall mass abutting left VesicoUreteric Junction (L-VUJ) (b) T2-W image showing left posterolateral wall mass abutting L-VUJ with Foley's in situ (c) diffusion weighted image showing diffusion restriction with perivesical extension (d) dynamic contrast-enhanced image shows enhancing L-posterolateral mass abutting L-VUJ and perivesical extension

Click here to view
Figure 4: Stage T4a and Grade 3 transitional cell carcinoma (a and b) T1 and T2 images showing right-VesicoUreteric Junction (R-VUJ) mass with extravesical spread and seminal vesicle involvement (c) diffusion weighted images shows restricted diffusion (d) dynamic contrast-enhanced image shows rapid enhancing R-VUJ mass and involvement of prostate and seminal vesicle

Click here to view
Figure 5: Time intensity curve and mean ADC values (a) Grade 1 lesion showing rapid early enhancement followed by slow increase with mean ADC value 1700 (b) Grade 2 lesion showing plateau curve with mean ADC value 1200 (c) Grade 3 lesion showing rapid enhancement followed by rapid wash out and mean ADC value 823.54

Click here to view
Table 1: Distribution of patients according to HPE staging

Click here to view
Table 2: Distribution of patients according to HPE grading

Click here to view
Table 3: Diagnostic efficacy of DCE technique for HPE staging

Click here to view
Table 4: Diagnostic efficacy of DWI criteria for HPE staging

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Accurate preoperative evaluation of bladder carcinoma is important because therapy depends on the clinical stage of disease. Stage T1 lesions can be treated adequately with fulguration on transurethral resection, and low-grade stage T2 lesions are often treated with segmental cystectomy. Radical cystectomy is performed for stage T3a and T3b lesions, whereas palliative radiation therapy is the common management for stage T4 disease.

Ultrasonography is good for detection, but has relatively lower performance with substantial risk of overstaging of superficial lesions and understaging of muscle-infiltrating tumors. [22] In our study, on DCE-MRI overall agreement with HPE stage was observed on 73.3% cases. Diagnostic accuracy was greater for Stage T4 disease (96.7%).

Statistically, the extent of agreement between DCE and HPE staging was substantial (κ =0.619) and significant (P < 0.001). An overall accuracy of 73.3% was noted in our study which is definitely higher than reported in literature. Tuncbilek et al. [23] have reported accuracy of 62.5%, 62% by Tekes et al. [16] and 60% by Buy et al. [24] This is possibly because MRI was done within few days of after doing TURP, making differentiation between acute edema or hyperemia and tumor difficult. In the study, diagnostic accuracy for superficial versus invasive disease (< T1Vs >T2 stage) was found to be 90% which is slightly higher than the reported accuracy of 85% (90% if small lesions excluded) by Tanimoto et al. [25] This was lower than that of reported literature by Scattoni et al., [26] who reported an accuracy of 92% using a 0.5-T magnetic resonance scanner with contrast administration. Our accuracy (86.7%) in differentiating organ confined from non-organ-confined tumors was higher than the 73% accuracy reported in a previous study in 1989 by Husband et al. [27] On DCE-MRI overstaging was seen in 12 (20%) patients in our study compared to study by Kim et al. [28] where overstaging occurred in 26% of cases. Understaging was seen in four cases. On DWI-MRI, overall agreement between DWI and HPE was observed in 23 (76.7%) cases. Diagnostic accuracy was more for Stage T4 (96.7%). For superficial versus invasive disease (< T1- > T2 stage) the diagnostic accuracy was 90%. In the study, we found that although accuracy against gold standard was of relatively higher order in DWI (76.7%) when compared to DCE (73.3%) yet the difference among two methods was not significant statistically (P = 0.655). It was found that chances of understaging were almost equal in DCE and DWI (6.7% each). A slight difference in events of overstaging was observed between DCE (20%) and DWI (16.7%). In our study, we found that both DCE and DWI have almost equal accuracy (90%) to differentiate between superficial and invasive bladder cancer. However, DCE-MRI shows relatively lower accuracy (86.7%) as compared to the DWI-MRI which shows 90% diagnostic accuracy. Our study found no statistically significant difference in the accuracy of MRI for staging transitional and nontransitional cell carcinomas. The overall diagnostic accuracy of DCE-MRI grading for HPE grading was found to be73.3%. Maximum accuracy was observed for Grade II (90%) and minimum accuracy for Grade I (58.3%). DWI MRI provides information on perfusion and diffusion simultaneously in any organ and can be used to better differentiate normal and abnormal structures of any tissues, and it might help in the characterization of various abnormalities. DW MRI of the urinary bladder seems to be a feasible and reliable method to diagnose bladder carcinoma. Bladder carcinomas have significantly lower ADC valve when compared to surroundings such as normal bladder wall, urine, etc.

In our study, DWI (ADC criteria) shows full agreement with HPE grading in 48/60 cases, while 8 (13.3%) patients shows undergrading and 4 (6.7%) patients shows overgrading. The overall diagnostic accuracy of DWI (ADC criteria) for HPE grading was found to be 80%. Maximum accuracy was observed for Grade I (91.7%) and minimum accuracy for Grade II (60%). Statistically, the extent of agreement between DWI (ADC criteria) and HPE was substantial (κ =0.693) and significant too (P < 0.001).


   Conclusions Top


MRI is a single comprehensive modality of choice for preoperative (T) staging as well as grading of the bladder cancer especially in a patient with deranged KFT and in patients with allergy to iodinated contrast agents. MRI scores over the other technique in being a radiation free modality. It can preoperatively assist in accurate staging and grading along with invasive techniques like cystoscopy and cystoscopic biopsy. Newer advances like dynamic and diffusion weighted MRI can add onto more information in evaluation of bladder cancer. DCE-MRI and DWI-MRI are comparable in staging and grading and thus combination of DCE-MRI and DWI-MRI should be advocated whenever differentiation has to be made out between superficial and muscle invasive disease during preoperative workup.

 
   References Top

1.
Barentsz JO, Witjes JA, Ruijs JH. What is new in bladder cancer imaging. Urol Clin North Am 1997;24:583-602.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 2010;60:277-300.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Vineis P, Pirastu R. Aromatic amines and cancer. Cancer Causes Control 1997;8:346-55.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Delclos GL, Lerner SP. Occupational risk factors. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl 2008;218:58-63.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Nilsson S, Ullén A. Chemotherapy-induced bladder cancer. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl 2008; 218:89-92.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
American Cancer Society. Smoking and Cancer Mortality Table. Table.asp. Published 2009. [Last updated on 2009 Sep 18].  [Last accessed on March 2014]. http://www.cancer.org/healthy/stayawayfromtobacco/guidetoquittingsmoking/guide-to-quitting-smoking-add-res.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Ries LAG, Melbert D, Krapcho M, Stinchcomb DG, Howlader N, Horner MJ et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2006. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2009. Available from: http://www.seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2006/.[Last Accessed on 2014 Mar 12].  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Wakui M, Shiigai T. Urinary tract cancer screening through analysis of urinary red blood cell volume distribution. Int J Urol 2000;7:248-53.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
MacVicar AD. Bladder cancer staging. BJU Int 2000;86 Suppl 1:111-22.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Morgan CL, Calkins RF, Cavalcanti EJ. Computed tomography in the evaluation, staging, and therapy of carcinoma of the bladder and prostate. Radiology 1981;140:751-61.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Hodson NJ, Husband JE, MacDonald JS. The role of computed tomography in the staging of bladder cancer. Clin Radiol 1979;30:389-95.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Bryan PJ, Butler HE, LiPuma JP, Resnick MI, Kursh ED. CT and MR imaging in staging bladder neoplasms. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987;11:96-101.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Mallampati GK, Siegelman ES. MR imaging of the bladder. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2004;12:545-55, vii.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Ichikawa T, Haradome H, Hachiya J, Nitatori T, Araki T. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with a single-shot echoplanar sequence: Detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:397-402.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Kim T, Murakami T, Takahashi S, Hori M, Tsuda K, Nakamura H. Diffusion-weighted single-shot echoplanar MR imaging for liver disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;173:393-8.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Tekes A, Kamel I, Imam K, Szarf G, Schoenberg M, Nasir K, et al. Dynamic MRI of bladder cancer: Evaluation of staging accuracy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:121-7.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Jacobs BL, Lee CT, Montie JE. Bladder cancer in 2010: How far have we come? CA Cancer J Clin 2010;60:244-72.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Montironi R, Lopez-Beltran A. The 2004 WHO classification of bladder tumors: A summary and commentary. Int J Surg Pathol 2005;13:143-53.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Takeuchi M, Sasaki S, Ito M, Okada S, Takahashi S, Kawai T, et al. Urinary bladder cancer: Diffusion-weighted MR imaging-Accuracy for diagnosing T stage and estimating histologic grade. Radiology 2009;251:112-21.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Lynch CF, Cohen MB. Urinary system. Cancer 1995;75:316-29.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Varkarakis MJ, Gaeta J, Moore RH, Murphy GP. Superficial bladder tumor. Aspects of clinical progression. Urology 1974;4:414-20.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Yaman O, Baltaci S, Arikan N, Yilmaz E, Gögüs O. Staging with computed tomography, transrectal ultrasonography and transurethral resection of bladder tumour: Comparison with final pathological stage in invasive bladder carcinoma. Br J Urol 1996;78:197-200.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Tuncbilek N, Kaplan M, Altaner S, Atakan IH, Süt N, Inci O, et al. Value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and correlation with tumor angiogenesis in bladder cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:949-55.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Buy JN, Moss AA, Guinet C, Ghossain MA, Malbec L, Arrive L, et al. MR staging of bladder carcinoma: Correlation with pathologic findings. Radiology 1988;169:695-700.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Tanimoto A, Yuasa Y, Imai Y, Izutsu M, Hiramatsu K, Tachibana M, et al. Bladder tumor staging: Comparison of conventional and gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MR imaging and CT. Radiology 1992;185:741-7.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Scattoni V, Da Pozzo LF, Colombo R, Nava L, Rigatti P, De Cobelli F, et al. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in staging of superficial bladder cancer. J Urol 1996;155:1594-9.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Husband JE, Olliff JF, Williams MP, Heron CW, Cherryman GR. Bladder cancer: Staging with CT and MR imaging. Radiology 1989;173:435-40.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Kim B, Semelka RC, Ascher SM, Chalpin DB, Carroll PR, Hricak H. Bladder tumor staging: Comparison of contrast-enhanced CT, T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging, dynamic gadolinium-enhanced imaging, and late gadolinium-enhanced imaging. Radiology 1994;193:239-45.  Back to cited text no. 28
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and me...
   Staging and gradin
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusions
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4653    
    Printed113    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded457    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal