Urology Annals
About UA | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Online submissionLogin 
Urology Annals
  Editorial Board | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact
Users Online: 739   Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 369-374

Use of ileum for complex ureteric reconstruction: Assessment of long-term outcome, complications, and impact on renal function

Department of Urology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Bhushan Patil
Department of Urology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra
Login to access the Email id

DOI: 10.4103/UA.UA_5_18

PMID: 30386088

Rights and Permissions

Introduction: Defect in ureteral continuity can be due to various etiologies. The surgical options for management of complex long-segment ureteric defects are limited. Use of ileum is indicated in these cases; however, the technique is challenging and outcomes need to be assessed in detail. Material and Methods: It is an observational study conducted over 4 years. After preoperative optimization, ureteric reconstruction was performed using standard techniques of ileal interposition in cases of unilateral and bilateral long-segment ureteric defects. Patients were followed up at regular interval to assess outcomes and see for complications. Results: A total of 14 patients were studied. Two most common indications for performing ileal ureter were iatrogenic injury and radiation-induced strictures (5–5 cases). Most common site of ureteric involvement was lower and midureter seen in 6 cases. The mean length of the ileum used was 11.2 cm. Mean preoperative nadir creatinine level was 1.57 mg/dL in this study. Average postoperative creatinine level at 4-week follow-up was 1.75 mg/dL and 1.45 mg/dL and 1.37 mg/dL, at 3 and 12 months, respectively. The most common short-term complication was paralytic ileus and long-term complication was recurrent urinary tract infection UTI. There was no mortality. Conclusion: Ileal ureter is found to be relatively easy and safe surgery even in patients with borderline high creatinine. There was no worsening of renal function attributable to the conduit in this study. In patients with limited surgical options, it is a suitable alternative, rather than keeping patient on permanent percutaneous nephrostomy or regular stent change. Metabolic acidosis and mucous-associated complications such as pain, infection, and stone formation can be minimized by adherence to strict protocol.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded296    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal