Urology Annals
About UA | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Online submissionLogin 
Urology Annals
  Editorial Board | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact
Users Online: 597   Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size


 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 13  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 163-165  

Pain modulation by audiovisual distraction during cystoscopy


Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical School, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

Date of Submission23-Jun-2020
Date of Acceptance04-Mar-2021
Date of Web Publication13-Apr-2021

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Amadadin R Alhlib
1 Perth Road Westdene Johannesburg 2092
South Africa
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/UA.UA_104_20

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


Introduction: Cystoscopy is one of the most common urological procedures used for either diagnostics, therapeutics, or for surveillance. It may be performed under local or general anesthesia. The procedure is associated with pain and discomfort.
Aims: The aim of the study was to compare the levels of perceived pain during local cystoscopy with and without audiovisual distraction (AVD).
Methodology: A randomized control study was performed at our academic hospital local cystoscopy theater of the urology division. Approximately half the patients already booked for the local rigid cystoscopy procedure were exposed to a distracting musical video during the procedure (study group), while the control group was not.
Statistical Analysis: Descriptive statistics were used to determine percentage, mean, and standard deviation (SD) for categorical data. The Mann–Whitney U-test for nonparametric data was used for comparing pain levels.
Results: A total of 91 patients participated in the study with 48 patients in the study group and 43 patients in the control group. The visual analog scale (VAS) ranged between 1 and 5/10 in the study group and 1–8/10 in the control group, while the mean VAS was 2.52 ± 1.2 SD in the study group and 4.97 ± 1.35 SD in the control group. The AVD intervention was statistically significant (P < 0.0001).
Conclusion: AVD during local rigid cystoscopy is highly recommended, especially in patients undergoing the procedure for the first time.

Keywords: Audiovisual distraction, cystoscopy-induced pain, cystoscopy


How to cite this article:
Alhlib AR, Haffejee M, Nel MJ. Pain modulation by audiovisual distraction during cystoscopy. Urol Ann 2021;13:163-5

How to cite this URL:
Alhlib AR, Haffejee M, Nel MJ. Pain modulation by audiovisual distraction during cystoscopy. Urol Ann [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 May 13];13:163-5. Available from: https://www.urologyannals.com/text.asp?2021/13/2/163/313610




   Introduction Top


Cystoscopy is associated with pain,[1] with first-time patients experiencing a higher pain level than in a repeated scope (P < 0.001).[2] Although flexible cystoscopy inflicts less pain than rigid scoping on first-time scope men, it did not cause less pain in patients who had the procedure previously.[3]

Types of distraction to aid in pain relief during cystoscopy procedures is controversial. In one study where patients watched their own procedure, a 40% pain reduction was shown,[4] while another study showed no effect.[5] Music, video, or stress ball distractions decreased pain during rigid cystoscopy,[6] and audiostimulation reduced pain during flexible cystoscopy.[7]

Study rationale

There is currently no data in South Africa on the effect of audiovisual distraction (AVD) during cystoscopy. Therefore, this study is not only the first in our institution but also in the country.

Study aim

The aim of this study was to determine the level of pain and to demonstrate the effect of AVD on pain perception during local rigid cystoscopy in adult male patients.

Study objectives

The study objectives were to describe the level of perceived pain and to compare the levels of perceived pain during local rigid cystoscopy with and without AVD.


   Methodology Top


Sample population

Adult male patients (91) over the age of 18 years, without any of the exclusion criteria (poor vision or blindness, hard of hearing or deaf, mentally challenged, spinal cord injury or any other sensory deficits of the perineum, any form of intervention during the scope including optical urethrotomy, biopsy or double J stent removal, and patients refusing participation in the study) but already booked for diagnostic local cystoscopy were included in the study.

Procedure

The effect of AVD on pain during rigid cystoscopy was determined by testing the VAS pain level in both the study and in the control group. This single-center randomized control study was designed to illustrate the significance of AVD intervention. A questionnaire was designed for the patients to describe their experience after the procedure.

Data was statistically analyzed to express the VAS pain level of each group and to determine the difference between the two groups.

All 91 patients were counseled before the procedure, given an information sheet and only once consent was given and signed, and each patient randomly chose a piece of white paper with either the letter C or S, to allocate patients to one of the two groups (control-or study group). Patients were thus randomly distributed into two groups: The first group had the procedure done under the current conditions without AVD (control group), while the second group watched a video clip with music (time lapse with sunsets, clouds, and stars) on a tablet during the procedure (test group).

The patients were placed in the lithotomy position, cleaned with Savlon solution if not allergic, or otherwise either betadine or normal saline was used. The procedure commenced 15 min after applying 2% Remicaine jelly in the urethra of all patients (control and test).[8] Normal saline was used for irrigation and bladder overdistension was avoided. The bladder was emptied at the end of the procedure and an oral analgesic (painblock tablets) was prescribed if so indicated. All the cystoscopy procedures were done by the principal investigator. Approximately 15 min (time to dress) after the procedure each patient (in a private room) filled in a questionnaire.

Data analysis

The collected questionnaire data was entered into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. The STATA Version 14.2 (College Station, TX, USA) statistical software package was used to analyze the collected data. Descriptive statistics for categorical data using percentage, mean, and standard deviation (SD) for normally or median and range for skew distributed data were done. The Mann–Whitney U-test for nonparametric data was used to compare the pain levels. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.


   Results Top


A total of 16 (17.6%) patients had been scoped before and attended the clinic for follow-up cystoscopy [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Patients who had cystoscopies

Click here to view


Age was not considered an important factor in cystoscopy with or without AVD and was not statistically significant (P = 0.17).

VAS ranged between 1 and 5/10 in the study group and between 1 and 8/10 in the control group, while the mean VAS was (2.52 ± 1.2 SD) in the study group and (4.97 ± 1.35 SD) in the control group. The AVD intervention was statistically significant (P = 0.000) [Table 1].
Table 1: Mean visual analog scale and P values for study and control groups

Click here to view


Early complications after the cystoscopy procedure were also determined: 57 patients (62.6%) did not have any early complications, while 23 patients (25.2%) suffered from pain after the procedure, 10 patients (10.9%) had urethral bleeding, and one patient (1.1%) had both pain and urethral bleeding [Figure 2].
Figure 2: Numbers of early complications post cystoscopy

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage as per the International Association for the Study of Pain. VAS is a pain measurement tool, which is validated for the measurement of acute pain.[9]

Many measures are used to decrease pain perception during cystoscopy, such as the scope sheet size and using a flexible scope instead of rigid, but were found independent factors affecting pain level.[3] However, introducing 2% lidocaine intra-urethral jelly 15 min before the procedure significantly decreased pain.[8] Listening to music was associated with less pain during cystoscopy and less sedation (midazolam) was needed during colonoscopy.[7],[10],[11]

Patients who have transurethral catheters for any reason experienced less pain and were more comfortable during the procedure than patients without chronic transurethral catheters. Four patients had chronic transurethral catheters, three were in the study group and one in the control group. All four patients had a VAS of one.


   conclusion Top


In this study, AVD is confirmed to be a reliable tool to decrease pain perception during local rigid cystoscopy under local anesthesia and is thus highly recommended, especially in patients who are undergoing the procedure for the first time.

Acknowledgment

The study was performed at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital. Special thanks to Prof A Adam and all Urology Department doctors and nurses.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Matulewicz RS, DeLancey JO, Meeks JJ. Cystoscopy. JAMA 2017;317:1187.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Greenstein A, Greenstein I, Senderovich S, Mabjeesh NJ. Is diagnostic cystoscopy painful? Analysis of 1,320 consecutive procedures. Int Braz J Urol 2014;40:533-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Seklehner S, Remzi M, Fajkovic H, Saratlija-Novakovic Z, Skopek M, Resch I, et al. Prospective multi-institutional study analyzing pain perception of flexible and rigid cystoscopy in men. Urology 2015;85:737-41.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Cornel EB, Oosterwijk E, Kiemeney LA. The effect on pain experienced by male patients of watching their office-based flexible cystoscopy. BJU Int 2008;102:1445-6.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Patel AR, Jones JS, Angie S, Babineau D. Office based flexible cystoscopy may be less painful for men allowed to view the procedure. J Urol 2007;177:1843-5.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Gezginci E, Iyigun E, Kibar Y, Bedir S. Three distraction methods for pain reduction during cystoscopy: A randomized controlled trial evaluating the effects on pain, anxiety, and satisfaction. J Endourol 2018;32:1078-84.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Raheem OA, Mirheydar HS, Lee HJ, Patel ND, Godebu E, Sakamoto K. Does listening to music during office-based flexible cystoscopy decrease anxiety in patients: A prospective randomized trial. J Endourol 2015;29:791-6.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Vasudeva P, Kumar A, Kumar N, Jha SK, Kumar R, Mohanty A, et al. Effect of intraurethral dwell time of local anesthetic jelly on pain perception in men undergoing outpatient rigid cystoscopy: A randomized prospective study. J Endourol 2014;28:846-9.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ. Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med 2001;8:1153-7.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Yeo JK, Cho DY, Oh MM, Park SS, Park MG. Listening to music during cystoscopy decreases anxiety, pain, and dissatisfaction in patients: A pilot randomized controlled trial. J Endourol 2013;27:459-62.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Harikumar R, Raj M, Paul A, Harish K, Kumar SK, Sandesh K, et al. Listening to music decreases need for sedative medication during colonoscopy: A randomized, controlled trial. Indian J Gastroenterol 2006;25:3-5.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Methodology
   Results
   Discussion
   conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed94    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded11    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal