Urology Annals
About UA | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Online submissionLogin 
Urology Annals
  Editorial Board | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact
Users Online: 333   Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size


 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 13  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 166-170  

Susceptibility of hospital-acquired uropathogens to first-line antimicrobial agents at a tertiary health-care hospital, Saudi Arabia


1 Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
3 Department of Clinical Microbiology and Parasitology, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Date of Submission01-Jul-2020
Date of Acceptance19-Jan-2021
Date of Web Publication13-Apr-2021

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Abdulaziz Alamri
Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/UA.UA_109_20

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


Context: Management of urinary tract infections (UTIs) is caused by antibiotic resistance uropathogens.
Aim: This study aimed to determine the important uropathogens and their resistance to first-line urinary tract antimicrobial agents.
Settings and Design: The region of Aseer, Southern Saudi Arabia, between 2013 and 2016.
Materials and Methods: A total of 1506 isolates were recovered from the urine samples of patients that were identified and tested against nine first-line UTI antimicrobial agents. Laboratory analysis was done as per the standard methods. Confirmation of bacterial identity and antimicrobial susceptibility assay was achieved by the VITEK 2 automated system.
Statistical Analysis Used: Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software version 21.0 was used for the statistical analysis.
Results: The dominant uropathogens were Escherichia coli (E. coli) 507 (33.7%); Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae), 229 (15.21%); Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 153 (10.2%); Acinetobacter baumannii, 80 (5.3%); Enterococcus faecalis, 71 (4.7%); and Proteus mirabilis, 61 (4.1%). Of all culture-positive uropathogens, 51.5% were resistant to the 39 agents, whereas 48.5% were sensitive (P = 0.7969). Regarding the susceptibility to the first-line agent, the most effective against the dominant (in vitro) agents against E. coli were fosfomycin and nitrofurantoin (93.5%) and (85.4%), respectively. Whereas those worked well against K. pneumoniae were cefoxitin (57.1).
Conclusions: The present study recommends the use of fosfomycin, cefoxitin, nitrofurantoin, and amoxicillin/clavulanate as the first choice UTIs treatment given their relatively high in vitro activity against major uropathogens. Knowledge of the bacterial species and their antimicrobial sensitivity patterns are always necessary to serve as a base for selecting the empirical treatment of UTIs as resistance rates vary geographically and with time.

Keywords: Antibiotic susceptibility, Aseer, drug resistance, Saudi Arabia, urinary tract infection


How to cite this article:
Alamri A, Hassan B, Hamid ME. Susceptibility of hospital-acquired uropathogens to first-line antimicrobial agents at a tertiary health-care hospital, Saudi Arabia. Urol Ann 2021;13:166-70

How to cite this URL:
Alamri A, Hassan B, Hamid ME. Susceptibility of hospital-acquired uropathogens to first-line antimicrobial agents at a tertiary health-care hospital, Saudi Arabia. Urol Ann [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 May 13];13:166-70. Available from: https://www.urologyannals.com/text.asp?2021/13/2/166/313611




   Introduction Top


Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are serious worldwide complaints affecting a large proportion of people, especially in women. UTIs represent the second most widespread infection and the main urological disease with a high overall economic burden.[1],[2] UTIs continue to represent a challenge to the health-care setting, notably with the emergence of drug resistance to almost all known agents to varying degrees.[3],[4] UTI causes a considerable economic load in the community and is related to substantial morbidity and mortality, especially among hospital-acquired infections.[5] Escherichia coli is still the main uropathogens responsible for acute pyelonephritis; however, routine antimicrobial sensitivity assay is needed to determine the empirical therapeutic choice. A good first-line choice for this pathogen remains to be amoxicillin-clavulanate.[6] Other studies advocate tigecycline to be an option that would reduce selection for ESBL-producing organisms including E. coli.[7]

It is imperative to try to use the first-hand antimicrobials sensibly for the treatment of UTIs caused by multidrug-resistant organism to prevent the development of resistance.[8] The first choice of antimicrobial agents for the empiric treatment of UTI is not well determined given the ever-changing resistance pattern among the uropathogens.[9] The misuse and overuse of antimicrobial medications is a worrying health problem that caused the spreading of bacterial resistance in many countries worldwide.[10] A study concluded that a single-dose fosfomycin trometamol was found an important choice for the first-line empirical treatment of uncomplicated lower UTIs.[11]

The prevalence of uropathogens and their resistance to antimicrobials showed a lot of variations.[12],[13],[14] E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were shown to represent 78.8% and 75.3% resistance to three or more drugs, respectively. This study showed that cefotaxime revealed higher activity (87.1%) against mainstream uropathogens, which was followed by norfloxacin (83.3%).[15] Imipenem resistance was found low (14.3%), and the most resistance was found to be to ampicillin.[14]

It has been noticed that almost all bacterial uropathogens apart from Streptococcus spp. have a multiple antibiotic resistance index >0.2. For this reason, in some parts of the world, for example, Nigeria, nitrofurantoin, ciprofloxacin, and ofloxacin are the first choice therapy.[16]

The current protocols for the empirical treatment of hospital-acquired UTI are mainly based on national and international recommendations. Information on the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in any geographic territory is needed to update and strengthen national protocols.[17] The treatment of UTI in many countries is a problem due to a lack of information regarding the antibiotic resistance of uropathogens.[13] The objective of the present study is to analyze the uropathogens, and their susceptibility to the main antimicrobial agents to increase our standing toward the treatment of UTI in Aseer region, Saudi Arabia.


   Materials and Methods Top


Ethical approval

Approval of the research was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Aseer Central Hospital (ACH) and the Ethics Committee of King Khalid University (REC#2016-07-07). Patient informed permission was not obligatory due to the anonymous nature of the collected data.

Data collection and patients

This was a noninterventional, retrospective study done between January 2013 and June 2016 in ACH, Abha, Saudi Arabia. Patient information was obtained from ACH electronic system.

Laboratory investigations

Laboratory investigations were accomplished following standard methods.[18] The culture of urine samples was done with (Cystine Lactose Electrolyte Deficient; Becton Dickinson GmbH). A positive culture is described as a clean-catch midstream urine specimen with a growth of 105 CFU/mL of a single microorganism or mixed flora with the main species. Negative urine culture was defined as no growth, insufficient growth, or a mixed microbial flora with no predominant organism.[18]

The 1506 strains were analyzed for antimicrobial susceptibility by the VITEK 2 system as per the company guidelines (BioMérieux, Paris, France). The antimicrobial agents tested were amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium, ampicillin, cefoxitin, cephalothin, ciprofloxacin, fosfomycin, levofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Inoculum suspensions were prepared in sterile saline to turbidity equal to a 0.5 McFarland standard from a 24-h cultured bacterial isolate. Inoculum suspension for the VITEK 2 system.

Statistical analysis

Patients' demographical data, symptoms, physical examination results, urinalysis, urine culture results, pathogen microorganisms, and resistance rates to antimicrobials and prescribed empiric antimicrobial therapy (agent and duration) were recorded and analyzed by the SPSS software (IBM Corp. Released 2020. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp).


   Results Top


A total of 1506 isolates were recovered from the urine samples of patients between 2013 and 2016. Distributed as follows: 2013, 383 (25.4%); 2014, 295 (19.6%); 2015, 294 (19.5%); and 2016, 535 (35.5%). Of these, the male sample was 903 (59.9%) and the female samples were 604 (40.1). The distribution of cases according to the age group is shown in [Figure 1]. More than half of the patients (53%) were between the age group of 60 and 90 years of age.
Figure 1: Distribution 1506 culture-positive uropathogens according to the age group

Click here to view


Bacterial species recovered from the urine samples of patients in Aseer region between 2013 and 2016 in Aseer region, Saudi Arabia, are shown in [Table 1]. The main species were E. coli, 507 (33.7%); K. pneumoniae, 229 (15.21%); Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 153 (10.2%); Acinetobacter baumannii, 80 (5.3%); Enterococcus faecalis, 71 (4.7%); and Proteus mirabilis, 61 (4.1%). The remaining uropathogens were 252 isolates (16.7%), which were not considered in detail in this study.
Table 1: Percentage of sensitive strains of the dominant uropathogens* to first-line options antimicrobial agents

Click here to view


The remaining 192 (12.7%) species include Staphylococcus epidermidis, Serratia marcescens, Streptococcus sp., coagulase-negative Staphylococcus sp., Staphylococcus haemolyticus, Pseudomonas sp., Proteus penneri, Serratia fonticola, Staphylococcus hominis, Enterobacter agglomerans group, Enterbacter sp., Citrobacter koseri, Staphylococcus sp., and the most undersized uropathogens were having <4 isolates (not significant uropathogens).

The susceptibility of uropathogens to first-line option antimicrobial agents is shown in [Table 1]. These species were E. coli; K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii, E. faecalis, P. mirabilis, Enterobacter cloacae, Enterococcus faecium, Providencia stuartii, Morganella morganii, Enterobacter aerogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella oxytoca, A. baumanniiHaemolyticus, Citrobacter freundii, and others.

The most effective agents (in vitro) and common uropathogens are illustrated in [Figure 2]. E. coli isolates were found sensitive to fosfomycin (93.5%) and nitrofurantoin (85.4%). Whereas that worked well against K. pneumoniae was cefoxitin (57.1) and fosfomycin (50%), P. aeruginosa was fosfomycin (70.3%) and ciprofloxacin (53%); A. baumannii, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (61.2%); E. faecalis, amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium (100%) and nitrofurantoin (96.6%); P. mirabilis fosfomycin (92.7%) and cefoxitin (84%) [Table 1].
Figure 2: The sensitivity of common uropathogens some of the first-line antimicrobial agents for the treatment of urinary tract infections

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The most commonly isolated organisms were E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, Proteus mirablis, and A. baumannii. In a related study,[3] E. coli (70.4%), followed by Klebsiella (21.2%) were the most prevalent uropathogens. Other researches indicated a similar pattern of the etiological agents of UTI.[14],[19] Although significant variation exists in some others, for instance, E. coil (44%), followed by S. aureus (20%), coagulase-negative Staphylococci (16%), and K. pneumoniae (8%) were the predominant uropathogens.[20]

Investigation of the bacterial types and their antibiotic resistance to a certain geographic variety of uropathogens is vital to help as a foundation for choosing the empirical treatment of UTIs. This has become essential because antibiotic resistance rates are variable geographically and with time.[21] Antimicrobial agents that are regularly used for empiric UTI treatment such as fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin) co-trimoxazole, levofloxacin, fosfomycin, or nitrofurantoin[22] were compared with the results from the present study. An outstandingly elevated resistant rate was developed with these empirically used agents. Particularly, a high resistance rate (>80%) was observed in, for example, ampicillin for the major four uropathogens as follows E. coli (88.3%), K. pneumoniae (93.7%), P. aeruginosa (98.9%), and A. baumannii (97.9%).

The most suitable antibiotic chosen for the outpatient's empirical treatment in all age groups in Turkey was oral nitrofurantoin and parenteral amikacin. The appropriate parenteral antibiotics that should be selected for the empirical treatment of inpatient UTI in all age groups are cefoperazone/sulbactam, amikacin, and carbapenems.[4] Comparable to our finding, previously E. coli and S. aureus were found the main pathogens in and many of them were resistant to regularly approved antibiotics. This leaves the clinicians with only limited alternative drugs for UTIs treatment.[23] Routine surveillance and monitoring educations are needed to bring up-to-date clinicians on the predominant pathogens and the antibiogram suitable to tackle such spread.[23] Moreover, forceful and constant health education using feasible media is suggested to prevent the threat of drug resistance largely caused by inappropriate antibiotic usage.

We would suggest fosfomycin which showed an overall inhibitory activity of 45.8%, then cefoxitin (41%), nitrofurantoin (35.6%), and amoxicillin/clavulanate (33.0%) [Table 1] taking into consideration their in vitro antimicrobial actions. This conclusion from our present analysis agreed with another investigation who decided that a single-dose fosfomycin trometamol as a valuable first-line empirical treatment of uncomplicated lower UTIs.[11] Many of the prescribed antibiotic treatments were shown to have high resistance rates.


   Conclusion Top


The empirical use of these agents should be discouraged because of increased antimicrobial resistance rates. The present study concludes and recommends the use of fosfomycin followed by cefoxitin, nitrofurantoin, and amoxicillin/clavulanate as the first choice UTIs treatment because of their better in vitro inhibitory activity against most of the uropathogens. Knowledge of the local antimicrobial sensitivity pattern is periodically required to plan an updated treatment regimen.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank affiliates of ACH, nurses, laboratory technicians, and information technology staff for assisting in the completion of the survey. We acknowledged the efforts of Mr. Muhammad Abid khan for his valued support.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
McCann E, Sung AH, Ye G, Vankeepuram L, Tabak YP. Contributing factors to the clinical and economic burden of patients with laboratory-confirmed carbapenem-nonsusceptible gram-negative urinary tract infections. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res 2020;12:191-200.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Litwin MS, Saigal CS, Yano EM, Avila C, Geschwind SA, Hanley JM, et al. Urologic diseases in America project: Analytical methods and principal findings. J Urol 2005;173:933-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Al-Zahrani J, Al Dossari K, Gabr AH, Ahmed AF, Al Shahrani SA, Al-Ghamdi S. Antimicrobial resistance patterns of Uropathogens isolated from adult women with acute uncomplicated cystitis. BMC Microbiol 2019;19:237.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Demir M, Kazanasmaz H. Uropathogens and antibiotic resistance in the community and hospital-induced urinary tract infected children. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2020;20:68-73.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Hsueh PR, Hoban DJ, Carmeli Y, Chen SY, Desikan S, Alejandria M, et al. Consensus review of the epidemiology and appropriate antimicrobial therapy of complicated urinary tract infections in Asia-Pacific region. J Infect 2011;63:114-23.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Flor-de-Lima F, Martins T, Teixeira A, Pinto H, Botelho-Moniz E, Caldas-Afonso A. Etiological agents and antimicrobial susceptibility in hospitalized children with acute pyelonephritis. Acta Med Port 2015;28:15-20.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Garau J. Other antimicrobials of interest in the era of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: Fosfomycin, nitrofurantoin and tigecycline. Clin Microbiol Infect 2008;14 Suppl 1:198-202.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Bader MS, Loeb M, Leto D, Brooks AA. Treatment of urinary tract infections in the era of antimicrobial resistance and new antimicrobial agents. Postgrad Med 2020;132:234-50.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Tseng MH, Lo WT, Lin WJ, Teng CS, Chu ML, Wang CC. Changing trend in antimicrobial resistance of pediatric uropathogens in Taiwan. Pediatr Int 2008;50:797-800.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Christiaens TC, Digranes A, Baerheim A. The relation between sale of antimicrobial drugs and antibiotic resistance in uropathogens in general practice. Scand J Prim Health Care 2002;20:45-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Keating GM. Fosfomycin trometamol: A review of its use as a single-dose oral treatment for patients with acute lower urinary tract infections and pregnant women with asymptomatic bacteriuria. Drugs 2013;73:1951-66.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Matute AJ, Hak E, Schurink CA, McArthur A, Alonso E, Paniagua M, et al. Resistance of uropathogens in symptomatic urinary tract infections in Leon, Nicaragua. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2004;23:506-9.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Qian L, Camara T, Taylor JK, Jones KW. Microbial uropathogens and their antibiotic resistance profile from hospitalized patients in Central Alabama. Clin Lab Sci 2012;25:206-11.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Shapouri Moghaddam A, Arfaatabar M, Tavakol Afshari J, Shakerimoghaddam A, Mohammadzamani Z, Khaledi A. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of bacterial uropathogens isolated from iranian kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Iran J Public Health 2019;48:2165-76.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Anandkumar H, Kapur I, Dayanand A. Increasing prevalence of antibiotic resistance and multi drug resistance among uropathogens. J Commun Dis 2003;35:102-8.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Ekwealor PA, Ugwu MC, Ezeobi I, Amalukwe G, Ugwu BC, Okezie U, et al. Antimicrobial evaluation of bacterial isolates from urine specimen of patients with complaints of urinary tract infections in Awka, Nigeria. Int J Microbiol 2016;2016:9740273,1-6.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Perletti G, Magri V, Cai T, Stamatiou K, Trinchieri A, Montanari E. Resistance of uropathogens to antibacterial agents: Emerging threats, trends and treatments. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2018;90:85-96.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Cheesbrough M. District laboratory practical in tropical countries. edinburg building, trumpington street, cambridge CB2 1IR. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2006.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Mageto VM, Gatwiri MS, Njoroge W. Uropathogens antibiotic resistance patterns among type 2 diabetic patients in Kisii Teaching and Referral Hospital, Kenya. Pan Afr Med J 2018;30:286.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Alemu A, Moges F, Shiferaw Y, Tafess K, Kassu A, Anagaw B, et al. Bacterial profile and drug susceptibility pattern of urinary tract infection in pregnant women at University of Gondar Teaching Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes 2012;5:197.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Magyar A, Köves B, Nagy K, Dobák A, Arthanareeswaran VK, Bálint P, et al. Spectrum and antibiotic resistance of uropathogens between 2004 and 2015 in a tertiary care hospital in Hungary. J Med Microbiol 2017;66:788-97.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Aypak C, Altunsoy A, Düzgün N. Empiric antibiotic therapy in acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections and fluoroquinolone resistance: A prospective observational study. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2009;8:27.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Oli AN, Akabueze VB, Ezeudu CE, Eleje GU, Ejiofor OS, Ezebialu IU, et al. Bacteriology and antibiogram of urinary tract infection among female patients in a tertiary health facility in south Eastern Nigeria. Open Microbiol J 2017;11:292-300.  Back to cited text no. 23
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Discussion
   Conclusion
   Results
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed124    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded28    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal