Urology Annals
About UA | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Online submissionLogin 
Urology Annals
  Editorial Board | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact
Users Online: 280   Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Ahead of Print

Management of urolithiasis in patients with chronic kidney disease


 Department of urology and Renal Transplantation and Robotic Surgery, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College and Hospital, Pune, Mahrashtra, India

Correspondence Address:
Sonu Sharma,
Department of Urology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College and Hospital, Pune - 411 018, Mahrashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/UA.UA_122_19

Context: Management of urolithiasis in patients with chronic kidney disease. Aims: To ascertain the best method surgical or noninvasive. Settings and Design: This was a single-institute study. Subjects and Methods: A total of 50 patients of CKD with urolithiasis were enrolled in this comparative study. Clinical evaluation, biochemical evaluation, and radiological imaging were done. The management strategies were individualized to patient need. Following procedure, imaging and biochemical assessment were done to assess the stone clearance and improvement in the renal parameters. Intraoperative and postoperative complications are also noted. The patients were followed up to 6 months. Statistical Analysis Used: Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 21.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Results: The mean age of the patients was 55.22 ± 10.76 years (range 28–76). Majority were male (76%) and had unilateral involvement. The mean preoperative hemoglobin (Hb), urea, creatinine, and total leukocyte count (TLC) were 9.49 ± 0.84 g%, 71.13 ± 24.09 mg/dl, 4.71 ± 2.45 mg/dl, and 8.67 ± 1.81 thousands/cumm, respectively. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) were the most common procedures performed in 23 (46%) and 12 (24%) patients, respectively. In 5 (10%) patients, PCNL with URSL was used. The clearance rate for different techniques ranged from 40% (PCNL with URSL) to 91.7% (URSL alone). The overall clearance rate was 78.3%. Fever (40%) and deranged renal function test requiring hemodialysis (16%) were the most common postoperative complications. Postoperatively, a significant decline in the mean Hb, serum (S.) urea, and S. creatinine was observed. The mean TLC levels showed a significant increase. During follow-up, S. creatinine levels showed consistent decline. Auxiliary procedures were needed in six (12%) cases. There were two (4%) mortalities. Conclusions: The management of urolithiasis among CKD patients requires individualized approaches. The selection of appropriate strategy results in good outcome and minimum complications.


Print this article
Search
 Back
 
  Search Pubmed for
 
    -  Satav VP
    -  Sharma S
    -  Kapoor R
    -  Sabale VP
    -  Shah AS
    -  Kandari A
 Citation Manager
 Article Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed235    
    PDF Downloaded97    

Recommend this journal